User talk:Robert.spindler1984

This is Robert.spindler1984's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Manfred Markus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manfred Markus. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve EDD Online

Hello, Robert.spindler1984,

Thank you for creating EDD Online.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

While the article contains a lengthy list of further reading, it completely lacks inline citation of references that would allow readers to verify statements and ascertain the subject's notability via relevant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W: Hello Paul W,

thank you so much for the feedback. Inline citation are fully prepared and I will add them today. As a newbie, I saw no possibility to save the article before publication to finish it properly. Robert.spindler1984 (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added inline citations and removed the corresponding tag. Robert.spindler1984 (talk) 15:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EDD Online moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, EDD Online, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manfred Markus (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Whether or not this person is notable, which I'm not passing judgment on at this time, I'm having to decline this draft on the basis of insufficient referencing. The sections 'Personal life' and 'Main fields of research' are unsupported. As is most of the section 'Education and career': the first citation comes in reference to the book series co-editorship, and seems to only support that — where is the preceding information coming from? Likewise, per WP:BLP, private personal details such as DOB and non-notable family members must be supported by immediate and clear inline citations. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manfred Markus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert.spindler1984! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EDD Online (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all of this is sourced to Manfred, and very little of it seems encyclopedically useful - most of the information would work perfectly well in English Dialect Dictionary or is the kind of information that is more usefully found on the project's website anyway. If you're determined to resubmit it, I suggest paring down the non-independent citations as much as possible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EDD Online and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 22:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manfred Markus has been accepted

Manfred Markus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 18:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manfred Markus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manfred Markus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manfred Markus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EDD Online

Hello, Robert.spindler1984. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EDD Online, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]