User talk:RobMeagherSAT

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Attention Therapy (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! RobMeagherSAT, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, RobMeagherSAT. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 18:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Attention Therapy (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 08:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy. Thanks! DES ^(talk) 15:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, RobMeagherSAT. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
Message added 20:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

detailed comments on sources DES ^(talk) 20:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy. Thanks! DES ^(talk) 16:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy

Hello, RobMeagherSAT. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sacred Attention Therapy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 04:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, RobMeagherSAT. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop your tendentious, and clearly promotional, editing at once. Your edits to Humanistic psychology, Transpersonal psychology, and Psychotherapy were wrong in several ways. Your inexperience with Wikipedia may excuse the fault of linking from an article to a draft, but a little thought will surely show that the material in a draft has in general had no oversight (and may in fact never become part of the encyclopaedia), and it is not appropriate to link to it from an article.

More serious is the nature of your edits: linking a general term ("spiritual aspiration/psychology") to one particular approach is, in my view, misleading, disruptive, ~~and intellectually dishonest~~. --ColinFine (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise: I've cooled down a little now, and I withdraw that last accusation. I understand, I think, that you believe that you have something so valuable that you have to tell the world about it. But that is not what Wikipedia is for. --ColinFine (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.—Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi RobMeagherSAT! You created a thread called How does a 'draft' article get published? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi RobMeagherSAT! You created a thread called Do you know of someone who can help me write article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]