User talk:Richmond96

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

To leave me a message, click here.
Please sign your name by typing ~~~~.
For previous discussions, visit the archives located on the right side of the page.

Your input is requested . . . .

R96, I'd like to get your opinion on this revised infobox template for college football players: [1]. After determining what data points to include, we'll recruit a template editor to handle the coding for us. Once we determine what fields we're adding and what we're deleting, then we'll work on the modified graphics. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jason McCourty page error

Devin McCourty does NOT play for your shitty giants lmao 67.239.229.99 (talk) 02:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not make that edit nor am I a Giants fan. ~ Richmond96 T • C 03:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

north florida rankings...

I get it that you must be a North Florida fan. You've kept their page this season up to date really well but the rankings table is completely not needed. Receiving 1 vote in the AP poll is not worth that entire table. Maybe mention in the header that they received their first AP vote (which I'm guessing is true) but if never in the top 25 in either poll then the ranking table is just a waste of space. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Bsuorangecrush, Fair point. Thanks. ~ Richmond96 T • C 02:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conference basketball season pages

Hey, I saw you have been actively editing a college basketball conference season page, so please see this discussion here so we can get a consensus of editors. While this discussion is specifically on the SEC page, it concerns all conferences' pages. Jhn31 (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Round of 64 vs second round

I noticed you started changing all of the second rounds to round of 64. I do not agree with this but how about this as a compromise: change it to round of 64/32 in the info box but in the gamename field leave it as Second/Third round? I don't think it will be that confusing and, like I said before, if anyone has questions they can go to the tournaments page. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Robert Morris's page. I think that looks good. Says round of 64 yet still has official round name in the schedule table. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that sounds like a good compromise. Can you make a note of this on the WP:CBB page? ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I assume round of xx only for 64 and 32, still do sweet sixteen, elite eight and final four? And other tournament just to round # and quarters/semis?Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would go with that for now, yes. Thanks. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll make the changes right now for the teams that lost in the round of 64 this year, shouldn't take to long. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll be making the rounds as well to make clean up the game stat leader colums per the other discussion. Are you okay with the formatting I have been using for teams that won their conference regular season and conference tournament? See 2014–15 Albany Great Danes men's basketball team and 2014–15 North Florida Ospreys men's basketball team. I added the line break so that the text is more symmetrical. Just an aesthetic issue. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say no need to link to the conference because that's already in the infobox. Maybe if the conference season has an article, I know a few do. I would say teams that won co-conference regular season titles and won their tournament should still be listed separately and not with an &. Like on Northeastern it would look weird to say "CAA regular season co–champions and tournament champions". At least it looks weird to me.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 02:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on your first point. For the co-champions, I really think it looks fine. Take a look below. What do you think? ~ Richmond96 T • C 02:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When separated like that its not to bad. The times I had seen it before looked clunky.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 03:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Color graphics for Infobox college football player

R96, here's a sneak peel at how the revamped infobox is going: Template:Infobox college football player/testcases#Joe Cool (typical example). What do you think of the colors, graphics, and layout and design? In particular, how do you like the "college varsity stripe graphics?" Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks really good. I was iffy about the stripes at first but I think they look great. ~ Richmond96 T • C 18:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The proverbial picture is worth a thousand words, eh? The idea is that the college sports infobox graphics will match those of the existing team and coach navboxes. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to change the team and coach infoboxes to match those of the players? ~ Richmond96 T • C 18:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My next goal is consolidate the various NCAA team infobox templates, and upgrade their colors and graphics to something very similar if not identical to this. The colors and graphics for the coach and team navboxes are already very similar, but there may be some tweaks based on the last five years of experience and greater sensitivity to text/background contrast issues per WP:ACCESS. That's down the road, though. Infobox college coach is probably the last thing to touch, and I'm not going anywhere near it without Jweiss11's blessing -- he has spent years getting its 1,000s of examples uniformly formatted. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguars

Thank you for changing it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.45.95.83 (talk) 03:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

gamename field

Just curious if you know whats going on here. On 2014–15 Fresno State Bulldogs men's basketball team the gamename field appears under the opponent yet on 2014–15 Boise State Broncos men's basketball team, and all other pages from what I can tell, it appears after under the stadium. I have no clue why it's different on Fresno State's but frankly I think that looks better. Any reason why this is happening? Bsuorangecrush (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Try purging the page. ~ Richmond96 T • C 17:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That looks so much better under the opponent. Not sure if you're the one who did that but it looked out of place under the stadium so good upgrade. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. That was User:Fbdave who made the change. ~ Richmond96 T • C 21:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm

A little young to remember the Beatles, aren't you: [2]? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. Far too young, but they were about the only band I listened to for most of my high school years. I was convinced that good music had died in the 70's, although I've grown to like lots of new alt rock/indie stuff. My latest passion is vinyl records, which I'm excited to see are making a comeback. Good to know at least somebody reads my user page! ~ Richmond96 T • C 04:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment pertaining to new school articles and categories

I began an important issue that will affect the college football, basketball, and baseball projects. You are a regular editor within any or all of these WikiProjects and your input is requested. Please weigh in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#University of Texas Rio Grande Valley athletics. Thank you! Jrcla2 (talk) 01:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

College basketball schedule templates, etc.

So, are we now going to have game stats leaders in all season articles (see, e.g., 2015–16 Florida Gators men's basketball team), or just those articles where the crufters demand the option? If we don't want it in the Gators season articles, now is the time to nip it in the bud. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest with you I'm sort of indifferent in the issue now. I still do not prefer them, but now that we have gotten the template width under control, they are not such a terrible eyesore. I'm not going to change the status quo and add them to Gator articles, and I'm sure you're not either, but if someone else does and updates them regularly, I'm not going to revert. I used to revert them from Gators pages with the "excuse" that we instead use a team statistics table (which is better IMO), but last season I didn't get around to adding one. ~ Richmond96 T • C 16:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"team statistics table is better." Roger that. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. But it is also more work, which is maybe why it hasn't caught on. ~ Richmond96 T • C 23:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting the error in regards to listing Derrico Peck as a transfer(the error) when in fact he graduated from Northeastern

Apologize for getting straight to the point, Derrico Peck graduated from Northeastern making The Dean's List last quarter 3+GPA, Did not transfer, officially a student athlete alumnus 2012-2015, suggest to reach out to him, he has an interesting story, graduated in 3yrs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.160.211.114 (talk) 05:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Less busy-looking table templates

Dsimic and I have a discussion going regarding the appearance of the table-cell templates {{Dunno}} and {{Unknown}}. I see you've commented there before; could I pester you to weigh in? Thank you! – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 01:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the consideration. I am not knowledgeable enough in this subject to have either a strong or well-informed opinion. I commented there before only because the issue at hand related to college sports formatting. ~ Richmond96 T • C 03:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...

Please check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Collegiate sports (USA)... GWFrog (talk) 22:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UNFOspreysLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UNFOspreysLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan 23:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tommie Campbell

When the frick did they resign him? From everything I could find, he had only one year on his contract and he became a free agent. And there were no sources for him resigning, even from the sites that said he was a free agent. If they are reporting on him form practice, I believe it, but why was there such a discrepancy? RevanFan (talk) 01:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering the same thing my friend. Very strange. Maybe the details of his contract were incorrectly reported, or his re-signing was somehow overlooked? Those are the only things I can think of. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, unrelated, I just saw your edit removing a player from a roster after he was waived/injured. If a player is waived/injured, put him in the reserve section with the "W/I" designation. If he clears waivers, he reverts to IR. RevanFan (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I was planning to add him to IR if he cleared but this definitely makes more sense. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Image-5 gum React packages.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Image-5 gum React packages.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 12:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

I did that, and didn't realize it, when I was doing a mass search-and-replace in Gators articles: [3]. Thanks for fixing it. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I was just getting ready to message you about it. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jacksonville University colors

Instead of removing the {{CollegePrimaryStyle|Jacksonville Dolphins|color=white}} from the Jacksonville University templates, just change the colors at Module:College color/data? The Module is there for a reason, and it save a person less time in changing all of the colors in the articles/templates. If Academic colors are different, than the Template:Jacksonville University should stay different than what the Module says. Also, I couldn't find a source for these colors, so maybe you can? Sources are the main issue right now, especially for the Module. Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 01:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't really find a source at all, so I pulled the green from their athletics logo on sportslogos.net. And I didn't know about the module, thanks. I do know that if you look at their athletics website and their various team uniforms, the shade of green is clearly darker than what was being used. That's why I made the change. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've been looking for a source for JU for a while now, so I didn't have a problem with the change of the colors (it was obvious they needed updated), I just thought I'd save you less work! Corkythehornetfan 01:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll change the templates back and edit the module instead. ~ Richmond96 T • C 01:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

College schedule template

Hello. I think the schedule/result box has too many wrap around instead of the info being in a single line. How can we make it better? Let me know if I didn't make sense. La Fuzion (K lo K) 16:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. There has been much debate over the template and a few months ago, we made some changes that improved the line wrapping. To do this, we decided that each row would take up two lines of text. Believe it or not, the line wrapping used to be much worse. If you have any specific ideas for changes to be made, please discuss them here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basketball. Thanks. ~ Richmond96 T • C 16:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay cool. I thought I was the only one for a second. LOL... Take a look at this and tell me what you think. La Fuzion (K lo K) 19:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks very nice. My only concern is that it is wider than what we have currently and may cause line wrapping on smaller screens. It also doesn't include individual game leaders in points, rebounds, and assists, which some users (myself excluded) feel very strongly about keeping. Those would definitely make the table too wide. ~ Richmond96 T • C 04:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that; however, this fits the average PC screen. I don't see where the individual stats are added on the original template. La Fuzion (K lo K) 18:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are added to some teams' pages, such as 2015–16 North Florida Ospreys men's basketball team and 2015–16 Florida Gators men's basketball team. ~ Richmond96 T • C 02:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, Richmond!

And may all your days be merry and bright . . . I hope the Jacksonville weather matches your warm holiday heart. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dirt! It was cold for about two days here... No white Christmas for me. Merry Christmas! ~ Richmond96 T • C 21:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jaguars Secondary 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jaguars Secondary 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gators women's basketball team

@Richmond96, MisterCake, and Zeng8r: Are you guys following the Lady Gators hoopsters this year? These gals look like the may be the first team that deserves to be ranked since Carol Ross left in 2002. If I'm not mistaken, the Gators women's basketball team is the only Gators team that has never won a conference championship. It would be a huge step for Amanda Butler, the team and the athletic program generally, if the team could move into the top-tier of the SEC and finally win one. Fingers crossed, Gators fans. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, they are having a good year. I have also been impressed with the men and I think they're ahead of schedule. My Ospreys are poised for another March Madness run! ~ Richmond96 T • C 23:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have not and don't often watch women's basketball. Our men's basketball this year already depressed me. I will have to try and catch some of their games. Cake (talk) 02:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:JohnWesleySavannah.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JohnWesleySavannah.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 09:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Bolles Billboard.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bolles Billboard.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 15:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Richmond96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2009-2012AFCS-UniformCombinations-JAX.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2009-2012AFCS-UniformCombinations-JAX.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Richmond96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Richmond96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Monmouth Hawks football coach navbox

Template:Monmouth Hawks football coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NFCS-1997-2008-Uniform-TB.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NFCS-1997-2008-Uniform-TB.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Richmond96/sandbox 3

The page User:Richmond96/sandbox 3 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5 Gum Image

I slightly changed up the table formatting in the list of chewing gum brands. As you can see, the image for 5 gum has too much white space. The list of chocolate bar brands has images that fit the image section of each entry without a lot of white space. Not sure what can be done to fix that on the gum brands list. Maybe you could take a look at the 5 gum image and the Razzles image as well. The Big League Chew image fits perfectly. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 13:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NBAlive07.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NBAlive07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NFCW-2000-2008-Uniform-STL.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NFCW-2000-2008-Uniform-STL.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]