User talk:Jhn31

Welcome!

Hello, Jhn31, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --J. Nguyen 03:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1979 SEC Baseball Tournament

Thanks for working on the 1979 SEC Baseball Tournament article. I noticed you requested help on the bracket. I can relate. I have been looking for a 4-team (for early SEC tournaments) and 6-team (for NCAA Regionals prior to 1999 & SEC tournaments from 1993-1995) double elimination bracket template but have been unable to find one. I don't know where I could request one be made. For the time being what you have done will have to suffice. It looks good enough. I'll edit the headings a bit (change "Semi-Finals" to "Finals"). If you come across the templates we need them please let me know. Also, if you're into editing SEC tournament stuff or NCAA baseball tournament stuff then let me know. Thanks again! Seancp 01:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks again for helping out with college baseball stuff. Right now the 2007 SEC Baseball Tournament is going on. I'm going to do my best to keep the article up to date but if you want to add stuff to it then please go ahead. Also, the 2007 NCAA Division I Baseball Tournament will be starting soon. That one requires a lot of work to keep up with. I'd appreciate any help you would be willing to give on that. It'd be awesome if we could get all of the SEC tournaments done, also. Quick question for you: I created the 1992 SEC Baseball Tournament article and got halfway done with the bracket only to realize that it's not a real tournament bracket like the CWS uses. It's convoluted in someway in the way it matches up teams to play each other. I just gave up on it. If you have any idea as to what the SEC was doing back then with tourney brackets then please let me know. I was only 12 years old back then so I don't really remember it. Anyway, if you're interested in editing other college baseball stuff then check out: NCAA Division I Baseball Championship, College World Series, and SEC Baseball Tournament. Those articles should be able to link you to most college baseball articles here on WikiPedia. Thanks again for your help! Seancp 20:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Washington gubernatorial election, 2008; California gubernatorial election, 1990; Todd Akin; Donna Christian-Christensen; California gubernatorial election, 1994; Rhode Island gubernatorial election, 2006; Oklahoma gubernatorial election, 2006; California gubernatorial election, 1982; California gubernatorial election, 1986; South Dakota gubernatorial election, 2006; Arkansas gubernatorial election, 2006; Wyoming gubernatorial election, 2006; New Hampshire gubernatorial election, 2006; Henry E. Brown, Jr.; Idaho gubernatorial election, 2006; Frank Wolf; Kansas gubernatorial election, 2006; Dennis Murphree; Steve Pearce

Cleanup: Veterinarian; List of Commander in Chief episodes; Republican Governors Association
Merge: Illinois gubernatorial election, 2006; Maine United States Senate election, 2006; Political party strength in U.S. states
Add Sources: Tom Latham; John C. Stennis; Greg Walden
Wikify: Electoral calendar 2005; Howard High School; Depressive realism
Expand: Vermont gubernatorial election, 2006; Arizona gubernatorial election, 2006; Nebraska United States Senate election, 2006

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 128.253.3.169 22:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AtlantaBraves.jpg removed from your user page

An image or media file, Image:AtlantaBraves.jpg, has been removed from your userpage or user talk page because it was licensed as fair use. Wikipedia's fair use policy states that fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's fair use policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of fair use images. Thank you for your cooperation.

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

College Baseball Project

Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College baseball related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college baseball WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you!

WikiProject Marching band

You're Invited!! Based on your Wikipedia contributions, you may want to consider joining WikiProject Marching band. More information can be found on the project page. We hope you'll join us!

.

Image:Cfdia.PNG

Hey, you need to add Western Kentucky now that they are I-A Independents

Image:Cfdia.PNG - Western Kentucky

I have added Western Kentucky University to your image Image:Cfdia.PNG. They are currently Independents making a transition to the Sun Belt Conference. --IAMTHEEGGMAN (talk) 15:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC) (Happy Thanksgiving, if your American!)[reply]

January 2008

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mississippi State Bulldogs. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ALLSTARecho 02:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

College Baseball Project Reminder

I just wanted to let you know that the Wikipedia:WikiProject College baseball is back up and running just in time for the college baseball season. I noticed you had worked on season articles for Mississippi State baseball (2005 and 2007). We've worked on standardizing new college baseball season pages. Right now we only have three editors working on 2008 articles. (2008 LSU Tigers baseball team, 2008 Clemson Tigers baseball team, and 2008 Vanderbilt Commodores baseball team). If you're interested in created and maintaining a 2008 article for Mississippi State then by all means please do, and join us at the discussion page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College baseball. Thanks. Seancp (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MississippiStateBulldogsbaseballlogo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MississippiStateBulldogsbaseballlogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chw.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chw.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chockey.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chockey.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Southeastern Conference football statistical leaders navbox

You've got a bunch of red links there! Jim1138 (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it! Jhn31 (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey_d1.png

Hi Jhn31. It appears that although you updated the points after the recent conference reallignment, you seem to have forgotten to change the legend. For example, right now it says the red schools are a member of the CCHA, whereas they are actually part of the Big Ten. Thanks again for your work on the map of NCAA DI hockey teams.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 23:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for you comment here: [1]. I don't expect everyone to know the history of every Division I football program, but I do expect most experience editors to understand the WP:GNG notability standard. This topic clearly fails that standard, and it's odd to me that some folks want to fight that. FYI, your comments about the historical Auburn-Georgia Tech rivalry were dead on point; that was a real rivalry, and it is fondly remembered by Auburn and Tech alumni here in Atlanta. There is periodic talk about reviving it as an annual or at least regularly scheduled series, but the difficulty of the 8-game SEC schedule and the recent weak performance of Tech makes that unlikely. No one remembers Auburn-Tulane, fondly or otherwise. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's very strange that people are seriously arguing over this one. Jhn31 (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Color graphics for Infobox college football player

Jhn, here's a sneak preview of where the revamped infobox is going: Template:Infobox college football player/testcases#Joe Cool (typical example). What do you think of the colors, graphics, and layout and design -- and the "college varsity stripe" graphics in particular? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Malcolm Johnson (tight end)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Malcolm Johnson (tight end), Jhn31!

Wikipedia editor Roches just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Added a message to distinguish between this article's subject and a wide receiver with the same name. A similar message was added to the article for the wide receiver.

To reply, leave a comment on Roches's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Project tagging for new articles

Jhn31, when you create new articles, can you please tag the talk pages of those articles with relevant WikiProject banners. This helps other editors coordinate their efforts with yours and gives us a sense of the coverage on Wikipedia of a particular topic. Please see my edit at Talk:John Bond (quarterback) for an example. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 02:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1988 Mississippi State Bulldogs football team) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1988 Mississippi State Bulldogs football team, Jhn31!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Categories will need to be added, and the talk page will need to be created.

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mississippi State colors

Per this edit: Mississippi State has an accent color of gray -- those hex codes can be found here. I think an accent color is needed, and either the #777777 or #CCCCCC should be used. C is seen better than 7, but they use both on their Athletics website. So it is not the wrong color. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 21:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the point of the color list, but the school's official colors are maroon and white only, not grey or black -- that's all over the website. That link you provided is the same one I used to confirm the official maroon (660000). Along with the greys, it lists an "official" blue, yellow, green, orange, brown, purple, etc., but it's not like every color of the rainbow is an official school color -- it's just that those are the shades to use if you're going to use one of those colors. What brought this on was navboxes in the "CollegePrimaryStyle" for Mississippi State having an awful grey (the darker one) border around them that's definitely not one of the school colors. In addition, the letters on the navboxes would come in with that dark grey and be impossible to read (on maroon) if it wasn't overridden to be white. I see no reason why Mississippi State navboxes should have grey borders when that's not a school color. Jhn31 (talk) 02:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the official colors are maroon and white, doesn't mean we can't use an accent color. This logo sheet for the university shows PMS 428, a.k.a. CCC. The blue, yellow, green, etc. is for academic purposes, not necessarily for Athletics, which the source even says "Along with the official MSU maroon being Pantone 505, below is a sample of approved support and accent colors that can be used in promoting the academic side of the university". Athletics uses grey on their logos, according to the logo sheet, so I don't see why it can't be there. They grey is used a lot in their logos, on their website, etc. CCC is compliant if it were to override the white font -- so that means it's readable. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 03:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Wolverines football statistical leaders lost and changed information

The tables now have several empty opponent fields and single game completions appears jumbled. Can you take a look at the vast changes that you made.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. Not sure why my code dropped those. Everything should now be fixed. Jhn31 (talk) 03:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1980 Hawaii baseball team

Hey, just want to let you know for WP:College baseball, I'm going to create a season article for the 1980 Hawaii team. Right now, I'm working on it in draft space at Draft:1980 Hawaii Rainbow Warriors baseball team. Quidster4040 (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maps on college football season articles

Jhn31, I think these maps you are adding to the college football season articles are pretty ridiculous and cluttering. You've also got a big problem with articles like 1950 college football season, where your map is missing all the small schools that played together with the big boys essentially in one division before NCAA classifications were created. @Lizard the Wizard:, thoughts on this? Jweiss11 (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think maps on articles work best when there's only a few locations listed, that way the map can be reduced to a reasonable size and still be readable. See the map on 1987 Masters Tournament for example, which I'd consider reasonably sized; stuffing 80 or so schools onto a map that size would just be silly, but blowing the map up across the entire page is arguably an even worse option. It's way too obtrusive. Lizard (talk) 02:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are already a number of similar college football maps on various pages here. And putting a nationwide map on a season article is pretty standard in other sports where the alignments aren't the same every year (such as European soccer and hockey). I agree that it doesn't look very good on mobile, but nothing in that template ever does.

As far as the long ago years like 1950 go, I used the "major" teams only, according to sports-reference. Jhn31 (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, someone put 4 maps up on NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision#Maps of teams. However, it doesn't make a lot of sense to just have them for 4 random years, since there's a change almost every year. I did tidy the maps up a bit though and at least gave them their own sections without words running through them. Jhn31 (talk) 03:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jhn31, it's not clear to me how sports-reference makes their determination of "major" teams or if that determination would be encyclopedic. Do you have any sense about this? Jweiss11 (talk) 21:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, especially when it lists which Independents counted as major. Jhn31 (talk) 22:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lemonis

Even if there are multiple reports, the standard practice is to update when the change is officially announced. These are still just sources, not an official announcement. Billcasey905 (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve J. T. Gray

Hi, I'm Willsome429. Jhn31, thanks for creating J. T. Gray!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Sources are a must. Please add reliable citations or the page may be deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your recent editing history at Major League Baseball shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle York (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle York (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle York (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mississippi State Statistical Leaders navbox

Template:Mississippi State Statistical Leaders navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NCAA Results Tables

Hi, I've noticed you add NCAA results tables to a few different NCAA articles I pay attention to. They're really neat in general, but since they aren't on every article, I wonder where they come from/if they're being organized by anyone?

Looking at the tennis one, I'm a bit worried they could end up very overwhelming at some point. Imagining what such a chart would look like for say, Men's Golf and it's 100+ year history, or even Men's Basketball... Embowaf (talk) 01:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There has been one up on the Women's Basketball tournament article for a while. I cleaned it up some a while back, and then added some to other articles, using an Excel spreadsheet I built to quickly put them together. I agree that if they go much longer than 30 columns they can become a problem, which is why I never added one to the men's basketball tournament page. I think they would need to have a horizontal scrollbar, and there is a table template out there that has one, but for some reason that one can only go 30 rows down, and I don't know how to create or edit templates. Jhn31 (talk) 02:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCAA Division I FBS passing yards leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Gordon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor errors in NFL/AFL team maps

Please make this minor syntax adjustment to the new NFL and AFL map templates that you have created. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do. Jhn31 (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team maps

Hey, a very large amount of the team maps you've created aren't used anywhere. What is the plan with these? Gonnym (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was thinking about adding them to the NFL pages (similar to how basically every soccer season article in the world has one), but then wondered whether I should discuss it with the NFL project or just be bold, and then haven't gotten around to finishing the maps back to 1920. Jhn31 (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, before you waste your time in creating more, you should do one of the above. I'd say be bold and add them, if they are then removed, you have your answer. If they are kept on unused they will eventually be nominated at WP:TFD though. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jhn31, I want to reiterate Gonnym's point. These maps you created for the NFL teams and for the specific seasons should be used somewhere as leaving it unused is just taking space for no reason. I'd ask you to raise this with the NFL project because if not, I will nominate them for deletion. And if you feel they shouldn't be around you could tag it for speedy deletion. But I don't want to take the step of Tfd without informing you first. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I'll get around to it soon. Jhn31 (talk) 02:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why not fix the maps correctly

Yes, their common names actually include "FC", although that has started to fade recently. Just use the width parameter because the text is too muddled and will likely cause problems with screen readers and for the visually impaired. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently having the FC for the Whitecaps on top of the word Seattle on the 2016 page. That obviously won't do. Jhn31 (talk) 16:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Doug Novak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doug Novak, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Novak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Contact has been accepted

Second Contact, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Howard Elton Lacey

Hello, Jhn31,

Thank you for creating Howard Elton Lacey.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references. The references should be significant coverage of this mathematician. See WP:SIGCOV

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NCAA Division I FBS receiving leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

Howdy. Are you going to delete "Los Angeles Angeles of Anaheim" from the infobox of the Los Angeles Angels page, as well? Might as well deny the name was ever used, completely. GoodDay (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is "denying" anything. The titles of the season articles are "XXXX Los Angeles Angels season." That's the COMMONNAME they were commonly referred to as. Just like the New York Knickerbockers are usually called the Knicks and infoboxes link to that shortened name. Jhn31 (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not denying that those season pages were moved to their current status, though I wish someone would've invited me to (assuming one was held) the RM. I'm more concerned with how the team is shown in the AL West standings, during those seasons their official name was the "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim". It wasn't the name the team wanted at the time, but a court decision kinda forced it onto them. GoodDay (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NCAA Division I FBS rushing leaders, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keenan Reynolds and Andre Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NCAA Division I men's ice hockey tournament performance by team

Template:NCAA Division I men's ice hockey tournament performance by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NCAA Division I women's soccer tournament performance by team

Template:NCAA Division I women's soccer tournament performance by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NCAA Division I FBS passing leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caleb Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Southeastern Conference women's basketball statistical leaders navbox

Template:Southeastern Conference women's basketball statistical leaders navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United States presidents by age

Template:United States presidents by age has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFL team map 2014 to 2019

Template:CFL team map 2014 to 2019 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mark Wales

Hello, Jhn31,

Thank you for creating Mark Wales.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article, nice work! Some of the references, such as to the The Daily Telegraph and Apple Podcasts, are not considered reliable — I've tagged the article accordingly. Let me know if you have any questions! (please mention me on reply; thanks!)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TechnoSquirrel69}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFL team map 1995

Template:CFL team map 1995 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1998–99 SEC women's basketball standings

Template:1998–99 SEC women's basketball standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1999–2000 SEC women's basketball standings

Template:1999–2000 SEC women's basketball standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2000–01 SEC women's basketball standings

Template:2000–01 SEC women's basketball standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2001–02 SEC women's basketball standings

Template:2001–02 SEC women's basketball standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2003–04 SEC women's basketball standings

Template:2003–04 SEC women's basketball standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1991–92 SEC women's basketball standings

Template:1991–92 SEC women's basketball standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFL team map 2021 to present

Template:CFL team map 2021 to present has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WBI bids by school

The article WBI bids by school has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject lacks the coverage needed to meet the WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]