User talk:Rhindle The Red/Archive9

King Kong vs Godzilla

That whole U.S versions section is info culled from pages 87-90 from Japan's Favourite Mon-Star. It's already cited.Giantdevilfish (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay I dug through all my source materials and added a couple of more citations. I also split the Steve Ryfle citations into two sections. Bear in mind a couple of things here.

1. I have almost every single published English language materials on Godzilla, whether it be books (including old out of print ones) or old magazines and periodicals. None of these books/magazines go into as much detail as Steve Ryfles book does in terms of the U.S version of the film. (The 5 Japanese Godzilla books I have don't even acknowledge the US versions). So in terms of indepth information, that's pretty much it. These other books/magazines just touch upon the Americanization of the film. So don't think for a second there are huge abundences of info out there.

2. I broke the Ryfle citation into two parts rather then explicit page by page citations, because what I did was consolidate the info in those pages into the paragraphs that I wrote. For example it mentions on one page Warner Brothers as a potential distributer, and then mentions Universal two pages later (so I just put the two together in one sentence). It mentions on one page the cost of filming and editing the whole picture ($12,000), and mentions how much was spent paying the script writers ($3,500) on another page so I just added it up for the combined cost ($15,500). etc. etc.

So I think the citations are more then enough. Let me know what you think.Giantdevilfish (talk) 01:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Year linking

This page explains that stand alone years should not be linked. The years linked to "...in television" should not be linked unless that page holds more information on the actual tv show. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I guess the "...in television" would educate people on the trends of the time. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Just want to know

You never got back to me on this. Did you happen to catch it? I'm still interested in reaching a conclusion. Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, it's been too long and I've lost track of this one. What was the issue at hand? Rhindle The Red (talk) 00:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

It was when I made these edits to Batman (disambiguation). Weren't we going to discuss that? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yeah. Just too many other things going on, it fell by the wayside. I, personally, prefer a direct link to the page in question; i.e Marques Houston, American entertainer sometimes nicknamed "Batman" or some such. Particularly in his case, as he does not seem to have used it consistantly throughout his career, so he isn't *always* known as "Batman". I also basically favor direct links whenever possible. Rhindle The Red (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

But what about the guidelines? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, the closest thing to this case it the example they use in Delta quadrant. The guideline says that a link to a redirect is preferable in that case, but I think that is because it will bring the reader directly to the place they want to go on the Galactic quadrant page. But the redirect for Houston is just going to the page itself, not a part of the page, so it makes sense to me to just link directly to Marques Houston. Rhindle The Red (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok. If you are going to make a change to the Batman dab, can you get to Hitler (disambiguation) and War Machine (disambiguation)? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jessie (Toy Story)

I have nominated Jessie (Toy Story), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie (Toy Story). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Superman video games Discussion

I wasn't sure if you ever read my last response for merging the various Superman Video Games pages. So I'll retype it here to make my case. As I've said before, each of them on their own are really short and to my understanding some stub pages are deleted if further info on the topic isn't provided. By merging them, they lose the stub status and those who made an effort to put them up to begin with don't have to have their hardwork deleted. Antiyonder (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk: The Star Wars Holiday Special

Hey I was just wondering why did you undo when I erased the South Park section? And why did you leave my sentence "The Star Wars Holiday Special has nothing to do with South Park so I am removing this section" on there? Sailor_Moon (talk) 17:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Superman (disambiguation)

I'll explain a few things. First off, the redirect in this edit is preferred over its target link according to the examples at #Linking to a primary topic (note that I'm referring to the redirect School (discipline), not the primary topic sample) and #Exceptions. Second, all entries not also known as "Superman" belong in the see also section or else they get removed per #Partial title matches (I don't think that there's such a thing as too long a section). And lastly, we can't use "Superman or Supermen may also refer to:" since MOS:DABINT tells us not to format dab pages in that manner. Does that answer your concerns? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I'll leave that updating to you. However contrary to what you said, if you read the infobox at Adventures of Superman (TV series) you'll notice that it says "Also known as Superman, etc.", hence, the discipline of the redirect. Take a look at this edit made by my mentor, JHunterJ. This case is no different than that one. Now are you convinced? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

RE: Batman (film)

I suppose removing it makes sense. OK ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Denham and Hilda.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Denham and Hilda.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

disney films

as someone who has expressed opinions on the topic in the past, please join our discussion currently over at Talk:List of Disney theatrical animated features regarding what qualifies as "theatrical release" vs "Direct 2 DVD" SpikeJones (talk) 22:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stinky Pete.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Stinky Pete.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rhindle The Red. You have new messages at SarekOfVulcan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Star Wars

Nuup! If you wish to revert, feel free. This was more of a failed experiment than anything; though, many of the articles on the list I don't think can stand alone as their own article. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 02:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:R3d3.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:R3d3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 06:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jessie from Toy Story 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie from Toy Story 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Denham 33.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Denham 33.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Denham and Hilda.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Denham and Hilda.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ViolentYears01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ViolentYears01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Clark and Lana.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clark and Lana.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Cracked

Hi, now that Cracked is a disambiguation page, please remember the WP:FIXDABLINKS policy and help with the cleanup. Thanks! --JaGa^talk 11:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Polar Boy.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Polar Boy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JohnnyCarpenter.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JohnnyCarpenter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Rock Savage deletion proposal

You've posted several improvements (thanks!) to the article about Conrad Brooks (the actor from Plan 9), so I'm hoping you've heard of Rock Savage (film producer). There's a debate currently in progress about whether Rock Savage is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. Your opinion would be appreciated. Please note that the discussion should be about whether Rock Savage is notable, not whether his work is any good. Please visit: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Savage (film producer). Folklore1 (talk) 01:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject invite

Howdy, Rhindle The Red! Your editing history indicates that you may be interested in joining the new Westerns WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and maintain Wikipedia's coverage of fictional Wild West articles. If you are interested in participating, you are welcome to sign up at the project page. We hope you will join us! Ma®©usBritish{chat} 00:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1-800-NEW-FUNK

The article 1-800-NEW-FUNK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no evidence that this album is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free and Easy (1930 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Montgomery, David Burton and Leonard Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Free and Easy (1930 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[David Burton(director|David Burton]] as Himself

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Looking at wp: official name, there should be a poll in the Post Holdings article as to what the name of the article should be. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

I have no problem with that, though I think the correct name is clear and shouldn't be in dispute. Rhindle The Red (talk) 20:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lego Star Wars (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• mini-movie and online game based loosely on CN's series ''Star Wars: The Clone Wars'' TV series)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Close-Up Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:GotGscore.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:GotGscore.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fleming Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:William Cagney.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:William Cagney.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rhindle The Red. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tim Rice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wizards of the Lost Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Héctor Olivera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rhindle The Red. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Story of Star Wars PVD v2.jpg

Hello. I decided to propose File:Story of Star Wars PVD v2.jpg for deletion. Please feel free to remove the tag if you object. George Ho (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christmas Party (The Monkees album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Davy Jones and Bob Wells (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rhindle The Red. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your edit of Space Force in the U.S. Armed Forces article

You are getting ahead of the actual creation of U.S. Space Force. As of today, only the House version of the NDAA has been passed. The Senate has not passed the bill yet. The president has not signed it into law. For this reason I have reverted your edit. Cuprum17 (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)