User talk:Rhian2040

Welcome!

Hello, Rhian2040, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Mark Cuban. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recently Uploaded Photos

I've done reverse Google Image Searches on several of these photos and it would appear that you have added a lot of images that are not your work despite you claiming the rights to said work. I cannot speak for if each work is eligible to be on Wikipedia under another license (yet), but I'd strongly encourage you to stop.--Mpen320 (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I thought that screenshoting images, counted as copyright free, I don't intentionally try to do this.

No Harm, no foul.--Mpen320 (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election, 2020. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amortias (T)(C) 21:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at United_States_presidential_election,_2020. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 21:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhian2040 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly

Decline reason:

It seems multiple editors disagreed with you. It also seems you have difficulties with the distinction between "one source" and "two sources". You didn't revert vandalism, you edit-warred in a content dispute. Huon (talk) 22:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhian2040 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_States_presidential_election,_2020#Just_Making_Sure%3A_The_Rules_Still_Matter, yeah, and a lot of people agreed with me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Yeah, I just would like to know if the people who have repeatedly disrupted the article have also been sanctioned, just so I know that I'm not the one being blamed directly

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in Missouri, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Hi. I reverted changes you made at Alex Jones, Kyle Kashuv, and Lauren Southern because they appeared to be inconsistent with our verifiability policy. It would be best for you to review that policy before adding or removing any more content. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions for biographies of living people

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 21:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Rhian2040. Note that this is not the same discretionary sanctions alert as the one you got in April; that one was for American politics. Bishonen | talk 21:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in Missouri, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cole County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Sharpe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greitens resignation

Hi,

just so you know, Greitens won't officially resign as Missouri governor until 5 PM on Friday. [1].

David O. Johnson (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MI-14 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Image Jeffery Miron.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Image Jeffery Miron.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Image Jeffery Miron.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image Jeffery Miron.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Portrait of State Sen. Sam McCann.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of State Sen. Sam McCann.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, 2019, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York, Kevin McCarthy and Mark Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of State Sen. Sam McCann.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New York gubernatorial election, 2018

Please stop reinserting information on Larry Sharpe in the section on Republican candidates. As I said when I reverted it, this information is dubious and comes from a fringe source. If you don't have a reliable source for it, it doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. Thank you. SunCrow (talk) 16:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in Missouri, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allen West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dem 2020 talk

Greetings Rhian2040. Rather than chatting via edit summaries, I'd love to read your comments on various issues mentioned at Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020. See you there! — JFG ^talk 21:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020

In regard to this edit to Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020, please note that Terry McAuliffe and Martin O'Malley have no sources listed that are less than 6 months old. Thus, they should not be displayed in the "Individuals who have publicly expressed interest" unless and until a newer source is found. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Mcauliffe has sources from late september 26, it doesn't expire till March 26th 2019 so i don't know what you are talking about ref:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2018-09-26/former-virginia-gov-mcauliffe-says-he-s-not-closing-door-on-presidential-run-video

Omalley has 1 in May i think, so it wont expire till January 24 2019 :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2020#cite_note-52

And quit getting rid of all the other potentital candidates.

October 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
JFG's changes appear to have consensus on the talk page. If you continue to edit-war without discussing it on the talk page, I will request arbitration enforcement. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:55, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems when i go to a talk page nobody responds, and they clearly don't seem to read the requirements for candidates to appear on the article— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhian2040 (talk • contribs)

You don't seem to have commented on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020 this year. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:18, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

there did it.

October 2018: RS

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United States presidential election, 2024, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

I know you have your own version of a draft of this article, but why in the world do you think crap like this is suitable for sourcing on Wikipedia? Or a random comment on Quora? This feels like you're just trying to make a WP:POINT about use of speculation or this being at AFD but this is nonsense. Please review WP:RS. Reywas92^Talk 22:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Bullock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeffery Miron Portrait.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeffery Miron Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffery Miron Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhian2040. It appears that this might be a reupload of a previously deleted file also of the same person (see #Replaceable fair use File:Image Jeffery Miron.jpg). Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is quite restrictive when it comes to non-free images in general, but especially so when it comes to non-free images of still living persons. To be frank, there's pretty much no way a non-free image of this sort is ever going to be considered acceptable per WP:NFCC#1 and WP:FREER because it's always going to be seen reasonably possible for a freely licensed equivalent to be created or found which can serve the same encyclopedic purpose. A free equivalent may not currently exist but someone somewhere could take a photo of Miron (perhaps while he's campainging or just walk about someone on campus, etc.) and release it under a free license accepted by either Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. You cannot dispute the deletion if you like by adding Template:di-replaceable fair use disputed to the file's page; however, even if the file is deemed to be non-replaceable non-free use, the way it's currently being used would not be allowed per WP:NFG and WP:NFLISTS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rhian2040. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Chicago mayoral election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John O'Neil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

California & Nevada governors & lieutenant governors

Please wait until Noon PST, when they're sworn in. GoodDay (talk) 19:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They're not sworn in until Noon PST. But, you're not going to listen, so why bother. GoodDay (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revert violation

2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period) per the edit advisory and the warning box on the top of the talk page, where you have commented. Your last edit was in violation of that. Please revert yourself, or you may be blocked or topic banned from the article. Jonathunder (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patrick Byrne OverstockCEO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Byrne OverstockCEO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Libertarian Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Sharpe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Mr X 🖋 21:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:49, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Democratic Party presidential debates, you may be blocked from editing. WMSR (talk) 17:38, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States Senate election in Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IL-15 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Libertarian Party presidential primaries

Please stop disruptively editing 2020 Libertarian Party presidential primaries.

I have already provided you a link that shows the New York State Board of Elections invalidated the filings of other ballot Libertarians for the presidential primary besides Jacob Hornberger. In New York, when only one candidate qualifies for the ballot, the primary does not take place and the candidate wins by default. Moreover, the final 7th round vote for Minnesota are the votes that are added to the overall total. Eliminated candidates ultimately received zero votes. If you disagree with this, take it up with the talk page. Stop edit warring. Ghoul flesh • talk 22:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IL-14 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minor party and independent candidates for the 2020 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Republican Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reform Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Armstrong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements

Hello! Please do not add any social media endorsements such the ones on 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida. If you have any questions please let me know! Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 08:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing sourced material without supplying a new reliable source

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Recession. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 01:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 01:09, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, Rhian2040. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Third-party and independent candidates for the 2024 United States presidential election, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You are receiving this because you stated in your edit summary that we just submitted his signatures, implying you are connected to RFK. Thank you!
—Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 20:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please also note that there is a WP:CRP requirement at the Zionism article. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 18:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]