User talk:Rezaya19

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezaya

Hello Rezaya19,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rezaya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MrScorch6200 (talk) 18:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Rezaya. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. MrScorch6200 (talk) 18:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rezaya has been reverted.
Your edit here to Rezaya was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/rezaya.official) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezaya

Hello Rezaya19,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rezaya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MrScorch6200 (talk) 20:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Rezaya, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Rezaya was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/Rezayaofficial) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Rezaya. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 21:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezaya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rezaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 06:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rezaya

The article Rezaya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiddle Faddle 09:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided, as you did with Rezaya. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 09:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Rezaya, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fiddle Faddle 10:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did at Rezaya, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fiddle Faddle 10:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This really is not hard

To make Rezaya satisfy our criteria for remaining it must have at least one reference in a reliable source. The fact that you keep removing the BLPPROD notice suggests to me that no such reference is available, and that the gentleman is not as notable as you wish he were. Wikipedia may not be used to give the gentleman his reputation, it may only report his reputation. All you are doing at present is heading for a block. Fiddle Faddle 10:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing has been passed to administrators to handle

There is a very strong probability of an editing block heading your way. All your work will have been pointless at that point. Now really is the time to stop your disruptive editing and self promotion. Fiddle Faddle 11:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezaya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rezaya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 11:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rezaya19

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Rezaya19, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 12:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK 12:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn from this block

Please spend some time reading about how to edit wikipedia successfully. Even if all you want to do is to try to create an article on yourself, something we discourage, you need to create a good article. Please read this essay which you should find helpful. We insist on references in reliable sources for all articles.

You may find WP:AFC a helpful process, but do not take any shortcuts if you use it.

Please do not come back and just try to re-create your autobiography. Fiddle Faddle 12:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wifione ^Message 17:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]