User talk:RexSueciae

Welcome!

Hello, RexSueciae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Smokey and the Bandit. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcellus E. Wright Sr. has been accepted

Marcellus E. Wright Sr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monster of Ravenna has been accepted

Monster of Ravenna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RexSueciae. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RexSueciae. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie Birx

Thanks for helping cleanup the article and trying to stop the disruptive editing. Not sure why it was fully protected though. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30: Aye, cheers. RexSueciae (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Derrick Evans (politician)

Why has this page for Derrick Evans locked? This needs an update because everyone needs to know that he was involved in breaking into the US Capital!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.27.68.16 (talk) 00:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I took the liberty of moving this comment to the bottom of the page, where new comments go. I am not the person in charge of the article Derrick Evans (politician), nor was I the one who levied the semi-protection. Since you are an IP editor, I will reply to your talk page with this information as well. RexSueciae (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, RexSueciae

Thank you for creating Annie Black.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Bellak

Hello RexSueciae since you created the article and coming across these images which could be of interest. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: Marvelous, thank you! RexSueciae (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Dracula

hi, there are reliable sources for his name and birthdate. his name is on the credits of every song he's made and he posted an instagram story back on his birthday, also, his age was found in one of his instagram posts saying he was 16 in the photo, and the caption read "6 years ago" so when doing the math we can confirm his age. I did not anything about the pronouns since that has not been released. other than that thank you very much! have a good day

Glucosegarbage (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Glucosegarbage: No worries mate -- I don't know if the IG story would be a good source (unless maybe it was archived?) -- and the age calculation from "he was X years old on Y date" is actually already in use! The article uses Template:Birth based on age as of date (calculating from a figure in a news article, though, not from a social media post). Honestly, it would make things a lot easier if more newspapers or magazines were to write about him -- finding enough reliable sources to get the article to stick (and not get deleted) was a tremendous labor. RexSueciae (talk) 02:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Dracula

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kim Dracula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lyrics.com/lyric-lf/2472504/Kim+Dracula/Paparazzi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:39, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For posterity, I was amused. RexSueciae (talk) 02:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About your comments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troutman Pepper

Hello, the redirect is cool but how could that work. The other company that merged with Troutman Sanders is also big and has an article Pepper Hamilton. Would both be updated with post merger activities? I really do not see why we cannot keep the merger article, I was the user the user that sent the afc for it.Rseinfold (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rseinfold -- good point. Let me think about it. RexSueciae (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Hey, thanks for opening the deletion review for David Firth. I was the IP who wrote that comment and I was honestly surprised that the discussion was closed with a consensus to redirect. I thought for sure it would've been relisted for 1 more week, and I was considering putting it up for deletion review later in the future. I didn't expect that Firth would post a Twitter thread about it, and I didn't know about both that and the DR until today. Thank you so much for doing it for me! :) PantheonRadiance (talk) 06:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PantheonRadiance No problem! The draft in AFC is looking good -- hopefully someone reviews it again soon -- otherwise, glad to see things more or less worked out. RexSueciae (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Blue Ridge Sanatorium

On 30 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blue Ridge Sanatorium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Blue Ridge Sanatorium was once a prizewinning pig farm? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Ridge Sanatorium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blue Ridge Sanatorium), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, RexSueciae. Thank you for your work on Charles Grobe. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you! RexSueciae (talk) 16:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Charles Grobe

Hello! Your submission of Charles Grobe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Gardiner Horsford

On 10 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Gardiner Horsford, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Mary Gardiner Horsford died, her husband married her sister Phoebe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Gardiner Horsford. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Gardiner Horsford), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Charles Grobe

On 12 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Grobe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charles Grobe wrote the "Lincoln Quickstep" in honor of Abraham Lincoln? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Grobe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Grobe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the Eden Knight article

We really appreciate your work highlighting this case! SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SocDoneLeft thank you -- just doing what I can in the name of truth and the preservation of knowledge. Hopefully I haven't missed anything in terms of content / tone / format. Let me know if there's anything else I can do! RexSueciae (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RexSueciae: The article looks great! Only suggestion: A direct reference to the Google Doc would be useful (the articles don't link it, but it's key to the initial fame, as the articles suggest). SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SocDoneLeft good point, I'd forgotten about that -- I had also thought about linking the tweet / twitlonger that Eden wrote -- but I couldn't figure out where to fit the stuff (and would it be an External Link?) -- hmm. Let me think for a moment. RexSueciae (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]