Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Ridge Sanatorium
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk) 03:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Blue Ridge Sanatorium
- ... that Blue Ridge Sanatorium was once a prizewinning pig farm? Source: "Moore's Brook Berkshires". The Southern Planter. Richmond, VA: The Southern Planter Publishing Company. June 1908. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
- ALT1: ... that Blue Ridge Sanatorium was once a farm that bred prizewinning Berkshire pigs? Source: "Moore's Brook Berkshires". The Southern Planter. Richmond, VA: The Southern Planter Publishing Company. June 1908. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
- ALT2: ... that while white tuberculosis patients were treated at Blue Ridge Sanatorium, black patients were required to travel to Piedmont Sanatorium? Source: Connolly, Cynthia A. (2008). Saving Sickly Children: The Tuberculosis Preventorium in American Life, 1909–1970. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-8135-4267-6.
- ALT3: ... that while the Blue Ridge Sanatorium is no longer in use, its buildings were "mothballed" to National Park Service standards? Source: Rathbone, Emma; Minturn, Molly (Fall 2015). "Peculiar Properties". Virginia Magazine. UVA Alumni Association. Archived from the original on October 27, 2021. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lee Wachtstetter
- Comment: This is my first nomination (self-nomination). I appreciate your feedback.
Created by RexSueciae (talk). Self-nominated at 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC).
- Full review to follow, but the original review is probably the best option here. Spot check checks out however; QPQ is acknowledged even though it was not required. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Giving this a tick since all other DYK requirements are met and no close paraphrasing was found. Since I can't access the source I'm accepting it in good faith. I prefer the original hook as I don't think mentioning the exact breed adds much to the hook, the hook fact is already fine in the simple form. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)