User talk:Retepretep

Welcome!

Hello, Retepretep, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Notability of UE Extremenya

A tag has been placed on UE Extremenya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 18:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Football players

Hi Retepretep, I have noticed you have created quite a few new articles. Good job! The subjects of the ones I have looked at appear to be deserving of articles. As with all wikipedia articles, they could be improved. Please take a look at the Manual of Style to get an idea of how articles are expected to look in Wikipedia. Also please provide references for all your articles. Check out existing articles like Juan Pablo Sorín to get an idea of how articles for footballers should look. Clerks. 15:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Football in Albania

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Football in Albania. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.albaniasoccer.com/en/index.php?topmenuitem=history in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Football in Albania with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Football in Albania with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Football in Albania saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Butseriouslyfolks 16:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of pages built from copyrighted material is not acceptable, and needs to stop. Please do not continue to do so. - TexasAndroid 21:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MC Saïda

A tag has been placed on MC Saïda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 13:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with MC Saïda. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 14:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of AS Khroub

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on AS Khroub, by Gillyweed (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because AS Khroub seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting AS Khroub, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate AS Khroub itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bekim Kastrati

A tag has been placed on Bekim Kastrati, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Od Mishehu 07:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Jordi Escura

A tag has been placed on Jordi Escura, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lwarf ^Talk! 10:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of SV Bad Aussee

A tag has been placed on SV Bad Aussee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 11:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Abdul-Yakini Iddi

A tag has been placed on Abdul-Yakini Iddi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Darkwind (talk) 07:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding article titles

Hello, thank you for contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you have not bolded the first instance of article titles within the article. Doing so conforms to the Wikipedia Manual of Style and is useful in the appearance of articles. You may bold the title by adding three (3) apostrophes to each side of the words to be bolded. Example: '''Text to be bolded''' would produce Text to be bolded. Thank you. --Spring Rubber 07:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Admir Haznadar

A tag has been placed on Admir Haznadar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Darkwind (talk) 07:51, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Are very short. Could you perhaps give them a little more work? Punkmorten 08:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In relation to the comment above, if you're not able to add any more content beyond what you have been, it would help if you could at least properly categorize the articles as stubs. Specifically, all of your stub-length articles I've run across are about Belgian football players, and thus placing the {{Belgium-footy-bio-stub}} template at the bottom of the article would bring it to the attention of other editors interested in Belgian football so they can help expand the articles. Thanks! --Darkwind (talk) 01:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted that you've created lot of articles about players of the Jupiler League. That is a good point but these articles need to be at least categorized. An infobox could also be useful.See the manual of style to improve it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. Don't forget that you could find lots of informations about French players of the Jupiler League at www.lequipe.fr. See also how an article you've created is far better using these simple principles. Thanks and keep on working! --Latouffedisco 15:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sudo Sulejmanovic

The article Sudo Sulejmanovic has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 11:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember, articles on Wikipedia need to cite sources, and be well-developed enough to show how the subject is notable. Maybe, instead of creating a lot of one-sentence articles, you could fully develop one, then move on to another? -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jérémy Njock

You forgot to add your sources to this article, and to develop it so that it is longer than one sentence. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Jules Cesar Oulai

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jules Cesar Oulai, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jules Cesar Oulai is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jules Cesar Oulai, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Nallbani.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Nallbani.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. HermesBot 15:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability problem with Jetmir Sefa

A tag has been placed on Jetmir Sefa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- According to playerhistory.com [1] he has yet to play a single game. B1atv 15:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sulejman Starova

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sulejman Starova, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.albaniasoccer.com/en/index.php?id=594. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

The formatting you use on the footballer articles is incorrect. See the changes I made to one of them. Also see [2] and [3]. Also I moved Ardijan Nuhiji (Macedonian footballer) to Ardijan Nuhiji because there is no other person named Ardijan Nuhiji. You might also want to use {{footy-stub}} and these categories:
[[Category:{Albanian} footballers]]
[[Category:{year of birth} births]], for example, Category:1989 births
[[Category:Living people]]
Thanks, Tim Q. Wells 10:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also see a list of stub tags for European footballers at Category:European_football_biography_stubs. If it is not listed there, then use {{euro-footy-bio-stub}} (if it is a European player). Tim Q. Wells 23:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the changes I made to this article: [4]. Tim Q. Wells 23:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Lika

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hasan Lika, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.uefa.com/footballeurope/news/kind=2/newsid=516815.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 14:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Lika

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hasan Lika, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.uefa.com/footballeurope/news/kind=2/newsid=516815.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 06:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian

I see you have been creating a lot of new articles about Albanian football players. You should note that the word "Albanian" may refer to a country, a language, or an ethnicity. To avoid confusion, you should write your links as [[Albania|Albanian]]", which will appear the same to the reader but will link to the article about the country. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. --Russ (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Amarildo Belisha

A tag has been placed on Amarildo Belisha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 12:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Lika

A tag has been placed on Hasan Lika, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — madman bum and angel 15:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I can tell that you are editing in good faith. But you aren't really helping by creating one-sentence articles that lack any details about their subjects' notability, and that are unreferenced. So I want you to know that, although I'm going to block you the next time you create an article that lacks references or information that would help a reader understand what makes the subject notable, there will be no hard feelings in the block; it'll just be so that you can take some time to learn more about how to create an effective article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 16:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Flavio Deco Junior

A tag has been placed on Flavio Deco Junior, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 13:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bledion Guga

A tag has been placed on Bledion Guga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 14:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Flamur Kyçyku

A tag has been placed on Flamur Kyçyku, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 14:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for creating large numbers of articles that lack references or details after many, many warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (Talk) 14:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-FisherQueen (Talk) 14:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

If there is nothing to say other than that a person plays for a football team, then there is no need for a separate article about that person; the player rosters on the team page are sufficient. If you want an article about a player, make sure that you have at least three reliable sources and at least enough information for several paragraphs. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Savit Mahilyou

A tag has been placed on Savit Mahilyou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. :-) Stwalkerster talk 22:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hranit Mikashevichy

A tag has been placed on Hranit Mikashevichy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sirkad(Talk) 23:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jasper Vermeerbergen

A tag has been placed on Jasper Vermeerbergen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 13:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enrik Dafa

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Enrik Dafa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PFC CSKA Sofia

The Current squad section repeats after your editing. I will remove it --Scroch (talk) 16:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Sarki

Te deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current Squad

Hi, I see you have beeen making serial changes to a large number of pages of Football Clubs involving adding '2007/8' to the standard heading 'Current Squad'. This addition to the heading is not only unnecessary but the format for these pages has been set out in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs. If you wish to propose a change I suggest you discuss this first on the Project Talk Page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Clubs. In the menatime I suggest you stop making changes and do the community spirited thing and revert your changes thus saving a lot of unnecessary work by other editors. Thanks Tmol42 (talk) 21:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you had taken heed after my last message but I see you are making these pointless and timewasting changes again which will just irritate and require editors to change their pages for no good reason as each year goes by which is why the style guide has been designed as such. Please follow WK policy and guidelines and the Style Guide from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Editing is best when achieved via consensus so discuss on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs page as your singlemindedness will result in you being the ultimate loser as I will revert these and will take further action if you persist. As I suggested before be community minded and go back and rvt your earlier changes. Thanks Tmol42 (talk) 10:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a curtesy to you I am letting you know I have raised my concerns about your recent editing to the Current squads heading on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football and encourage you to set out your rationale for the changes you have been making these. If you have a good case I am sure it will recieve a fair airing by the community which will save you time in making these changes yourself otherwise you will get a reality check on your approach to editing which will I am sure will be equally helpful. While I have nailed my colours to the mast already I am equally happy to go with the consensus view.Tmol42 (talk) 11:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop - continuing to edit in your current manner will eventually be considered vandalism and your account will be blocked. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of football clubs in Faroe Islands

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of football clubs in Faroe Islands, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of football clubs in Faroe Islands. Polly (Parrot) 22:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Leicester City F.C., you will be blocked from editing. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raheem Alibhai

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Raheem Alibhai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Raheem Alibhai. Oo7565 (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Liridon Leci

A tag has been placed on Liridon Leci requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Avruch^T 22:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Suad Lici

A tag has been placed on Suad Lici requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Uliks Kotrri

A tag has been placed on Uliks Kotrri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pontificio Collegio Urbano (football club in Vatican City)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pontificio Collegio Urbano (football club in Vatican City), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UE Extremenya

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article UE Extremenya, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Collegio Internazionale Mater Ecclesiae (football club in Vatican City)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Collegio Internazionale Mater Ecclesiae (football club in Vatican City), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 14:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vatican City teams

Could you please hold off creating anymore Vatican City football teams for a while. It doesn't look like any of those are notable. I'll start a discussion at the Wikiproject:Football. Fram (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Vatican City clubs. Fram (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be nominating these articles for deletion after consensus at the discussion was that these clubs should not have articles. I'll not notify you of each proposed deletion, since that would only flood your talk page. Fram (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Akamba Hyacinth Mengwa

I have nominated Akamba Hyacinth Mengwa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akamba Hyacinth Mengwa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mosmof (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vicenzo Verhoeven

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vicenzo Verhoeven, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails notability at WP:ATHLETE having never played in a fully-professional league/competition

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 04:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sudo Sulejmanovic

The article Sudo Sulejmanovic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who has never played in a fully-pro league and has no sources which satisfy general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stjepan Cvitković

The article Stjepan Cvitković has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who has not played in a fully-pro league and doesn't satisfy general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ghislain Rostand Simotanko

The article Ghislain Rostand Simotanko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nico Flammini

The article Nico Flammini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 14:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manory Delferrière

The article Manory Delferrière has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goran Bulić

The article Goran Bulić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ilir Çaushaj

The article Ilir Çaushaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of playing at a professional level, fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wouter Vandermieren

The article Wouter Vandermieren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 02:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Wauthy

The article Kevin Wauthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Baert

The article Kevin Baert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Football in Anguilla

A tag has been placed on Football in Anguilla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Halestock (talk) 04:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Retepretep! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 54 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Elvis Johnny Correa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Péter Orosz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arjan Berisha - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Erindo Karabeci - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gugash Magani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elvis Kaja - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Edmond Doci - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marenglen Kapaj - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Klodian Samina - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arlind Norra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

44More...

11. Sajdi Gjri

12. Arsen Beqiri

13. Franc Ahi

14. Medin Zhega

15. Mario Kovačević

16. Ilirjan Caushi

17. Sebino Plaku

18. Premton Mujo

19. Igli Allmuça

20. Elton Ceno

21. Endri Dalipi

22. Sokol Bulku

23. Gledis Tafaj

24. Oriand Abazaj (footballer)

25. Loren Omuri (footballer)

26. Renaldo Kalari (footballer)

27. Arjan Sheta

28. Fjodor Xhafa

29. Merdian Kasollja

30. Anicet Eyenga

31. Ervis Gomar Agolli

32. Alban Tafaj

33. Besian Celiku

34. Eldoraldo Markoçi

35. Erald Deliallisi

36. Alban Muca

37. Egert Bakalli

38. Gaetano Lamonaca

39. Marc Eberle

40. Marcos Pereira

41. Robin Muller van Moppes

42. Ernandes Bueno de Castro

43. Roel van Hemert

44. Carles Coto

45. Dražen Gović

46. Robin Henkens

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Valter Fushaj

I have nominated Valter Fushaj, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valter Fushaj. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Eldumpo (talk) 11:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of football clubs in American Samoa

I have nominated List of football clubs in American Samoa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football clubs in American Samoa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jameboy (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arlind Norra

The article Arlind Norra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not meet Wikipedia: Notability (sports) for the football (soccer) section.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. warrior 4321 16:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goran Bašić

The article Goran Bašić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league (has only played in Croatian 2nd division) and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Premton Mujo

The article Premton Mujo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Loren Omuri (footballer)

The article Loren Omuri (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merdian Kasollja

The article Merdian Kasollja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edmond Doci

The article Edmond Doci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Egert Bakalli

The article Egert Bakalli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eldoraldo Markoçi

The article Eldoraldo Markoçi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Endri Dalipi

The article Endri Dalipi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:06, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gledis Tafaj

The article Gledis Tafaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klodian Samina

The article Klodian Samina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marenglen Kapaj

The article Marenglen Kapaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ernandes Bueno de Castro

The article Ernandes Bueno de Castro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not asserted. Unsourced biography of a living person (BLP).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kubanczyk (talk) 23:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleksandar Popovski

The article Aleksandar Popovski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ransford Addo

The article Ransford Addo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of football clubs in Laos

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of football clubs in Laos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shire Reeve (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of football clubs in Liechtenstein

Hi there, I just wanted to explain my previous revert. I have no problem, in principle, with List of football clubs in Liechtenstein being an article. But on the other hand, topics should only have stand-alone articles if they contain information that could not be reasonably included in another article. At the moment, List of top-division football clubs in UEFA countries#Liechtenstein is more comprehensive than the article, so as things stand, it would be beneficial for a reader to be redirected there.

I have seen some of the excellent work that you've done at FC Jeunesse Canach. For that reason, and in the spirit of assuming that we both want what's best for our coverage of Liechtenstein football, I'll leave the article alone for a couple of days. If, after a period of time, I don't see improvements that warrant a stand-alone article, I may regrettably take the decision to nominate it for deletion. Please don't take this as criticism or of favourtism to bigger countries. I want Liechtenstein football to be covered in the best way possible, but at the moment I genuinely believe that a redirect does a better job of that than a bullet-pointed list. Regards, —W F C— 07:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niue Soccer Federation

The article Niue Soccer Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We need some sources/refrences, as well as more info.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kamkek (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of football clubs

Hi. It is good to create articles about football in various countries. However, a list of clubs which are just red links with no additional information and no context is pretty useless. Please improve these lists by arranging them in a logical order, linking only notable clubs, and noting the tags I have placed. Deb (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of football clubs in Liechtenstein

This is a courtesy note, to let you know that an article you are involved in has been nominated for deletion. I would encourage you to engage in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football clubs in Liechtenstein. Regards, —W F C— 14:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of football clubs in Tuvalu

The article List of football clubs in Tuvalu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Every element on the list is red linked. Not much point to the list at this time.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Squad lists

Please stop editing articles and creating your own format of squad list. There is a standard layout, an example of which you can see here. If you continue to do this against consensus, I'm afraid you will end up blocked. Number 5 7 15:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this is your final warning. Any more edits to squad lists (unless using the standard layout) will result in a block. Number 5 7 15:20, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For national team squad lists please use format per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/National_teams#Current_squad.--ClubOranje^T 00:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to discuss this block, please use your talk page. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Football in Singapore

The article Football in Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

content-free stub; user blocked indef for repeatedly creating similar articles without discussion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 07:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Football in Senegal

The article Football in Senegal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content-free, unreferenced stub

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Football in Samoa

The article Football in Samoa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content-free, unreferenced stub

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Łukasz Cieślewicz

The article Łukasz Cieślewicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oriand Abazaj (footballer)

The article Oriand Abazaj (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Life^talk 01:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dritan Krasniqi

The article Dritan Krasniqi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Filippo Porco

The article Filippo Porco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 12:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sajdi Gjri

The article Sajdi Gjri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a footballer who plays in the Albanian second level and I can find no indication this article passes any of our notability guidelines - the only source available about this person is the transfermarkt profile.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 14:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 FK Austria Wien season

I've started the 2012–13 FK Austria Wien season article. Feel free to join in. Kingjeff (talk) 17:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erald Deliallisi

The article Erald Deliallisi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vangjel Mile

The article Vangjel Mile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alban Muca

The article Alban Muca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elvis Kotorri

The article Elvis Kotorri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 08:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erjon Hoti

The article Erjon Hoti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leandro Gil Miranda da Silva

The article Leandro Gil Miranda da Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG and WP:athlete, as he never play in fully professional league (Albania and Brazil state level aren't pro level)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Matthew_hk t c 14:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vincent Ehouman

The article Vincent Ehouman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who never played in a fully professional league; only played as high as the Championnat National in France and the Belgian Second Division and did not appear in any cup competitions that count towards notability. More importantly, fails WP:GNG as he has not received significant independent coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigDom (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of football clubs in Kiribati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of football clubs in Kiribati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 18:32, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Besnik Sulaj

Hello, Retepretep

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Besnik Sulaj, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 23:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Besnik Sulaj moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Besnik Sulaj, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 09:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Besnik Sulaj

Hello Retepretep,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Besnik Sulaj for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 10:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leandro Gil Miranda da Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leandro Gil Miranda da Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leandro Gil Miranda da Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elvis (footballer, born 1986)

The article Elvis (footballer, born 1986) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A very short article with only three sources used and there has not been any improvement to the article in 10 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Football in Slovakia

The article Football in Slovakia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

all info except the lead is contained in other articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michael H (talk) 11:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Football in Slovakia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Football in Slovakia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football in Slovakia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Michael H (talk) 20:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of football clubs in Montserrat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of football clubs in Montserrat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football clubs in Montserrat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 16:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]