Jump to content

User talk:Resident Mario/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5


Hi and Welcome!

Hi there! I saw your comment about the help page for Wikipedia. I imagine the reason for there not being a single printable help page is due to the shear size of it! There is this help page: Help:Contents, which is a good starting point. if you're talking about the syntax of Wikipedia, there is this Wikipedia:How to edit a page. Hope the links help. Let me know if you have any questions or need any help. All the best. - Akamad (talk) 02:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Fortunately, you don't really have to study the syntax, you'll end up picking it up as you go along. So no need to be discouraged! - Akamad (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Userpage:Resident Mario Userbox

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 01:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Where to put those userboxes

You an put them on any page in your username space. What I mean by that is pages like:

FlyingToaster 02:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Seasons greetings

MERRY CHRISTMAS (or other winter holiday) AND A HAPPY GAMEDAY

--B (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the Milhist project

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Woody (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

I only clicked on "New section" at the top so anyone who uses that function will add their new section below your formatting. You might want to reformat that so as to avoid that problem. If you have any Milhist questions, don't hesitate to ask. Regards, Woody (talk) 23:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Hello Again!

Very fancy userpage! One suggestion I can make though. You know the pictures you have on the bottom of the page (with links to your talk page, sandbox, etc.). It is possible to link the images to the articles you want, such that when you click on the image, you go to the article's page as opposed to the image page. I've seen it done in two different ways:

  • The first is on the Reference Desk. You'll note that when you click on the image, you go straight to the page. You can see the code for it here.
  • The second method is visible here: User:NuclearWarfare. The code for that one is available here.

But really, that's only a minor thing. Other than that, like I said, it's a very fancy looking userpage! Well done!(Oh, and cheers for the barnstar!) - Akamad (talk) 08:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

RE:Reply to (on Akamad's talk page) Thanx, I stole the code off User:Example and modified it for my own use.Resident Mario (talk)

new messages

Hello, Resident Mario. You have new messages at Flaming's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User:Example

This site displays at the top that it is an alternate account operated by you. OK, ??????? Resident Mario (talk) 22:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

While technically it could be called an alternate account of mine, it is not actually operated by me. I only used it once (to add a note mentioning its purpose and "owner"), and later indefinitely blocked it. It was created to be used on examples and documentation (like on the examples for {{user}}), in the same way example.com is used as an example domain name in documentation. The Wikipedia community later seems to have decided to use its user space as an example user space. You could say the account in a way belongs to the community, and it being created by me is a mere technical detail. --cesarb (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
just checking, I've seen the page before you put that up. Really, that should have been up sooner, for it wouldn't have caused a mini-controversy. RezMar Yell at me! —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC).
Actually, it was not me who put that notice on that page. It was someone else. --cesarb (talk) 23:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Mack Emerman

A tag has been placed on Mack Emerman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. OttoTheFish (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of File:BookofLife.svg

A tag has been placed on File:BookofLife.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:BookofLife.svg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mononomic (talk) 00:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009-I get warned alot

The recent edit you made to Portal:Disney/Selected picture/3 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 16:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

It's not vandalism, becuase I was the only contributer anyway. The problem with Disney portals is that all of his material is copyrighted, and its hard to find a free image. I blanked it becuase "Rafaki.jpg" or whatever is a nonfree image (oops), so it i thought it better to simply blank it-the latter part of a file's tag is not a very pretty thing on a portal.
Resident Mario (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. Sorry for the confusion, but when I saw a template named as such getting blanked, the response was to revert. You might try using an edit summary, which may (or may not) avoid the wrath of vandal fighters going as fast as they can. You can also nominate it for deletion if you don't intend to use the page again. If you need any help, let me know and I'll steer you in the right direction. Once again, my apologies. --Chasingsol(talk) 16:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
I forgot the summary by accident. Stupid mistake. Resident Mario (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in Template talk:Welcome, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 03:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

|*.*| Obviously. Since when was making an simple, everyday error an issue? Resident Mario (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Portal Arctic

Thank you for your note and for taking the time to nominate the two images for The Arctic Portal. As the portal has been lacking new content for a short while, I added both images and commented at the nomination page. The Arctic Hare is closer to encylopaedic type quality than the other, however. The other image of the Peary Caribou is about a unique reindeer which may not be around much longer especially in this era of climate change. If there is a better image taken of the caribou it should be swapped out however. Kind Regards. SriMesh | talk 01:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! 

 _______________________________________________________________________
 *********************************************************************** 
|*  _____   _   _    ___    _   _   _  _    __   __  ___   _   _    _  *|
|* |_   _| | |_| |  / _ \  | \ | | | |/ /   \ \_/ / /   \ | | | |  | | *|
|*   | |   |  _  | / |_| \ | |\| | |   |     \   /  | o | | |_| |  |_| *|
|*   |_|   |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| \_| |_|\_\     |_|   \___/ \_____/  [_] *|
|*                                                                     *|
|***********************************************************************|
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
0:) much apreciated. Thanx, Resident Mario (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello there, it would be Ok to let me know of your ideas, but also post them at the portal, as there are other folk on the talk pages who have provided feedback as well. The folks who initiated the wikiproject halped find the original featured articles and pictures, and also helped to created them as well. Portals are unique features and it is nice to have the content rotating through and updated. The Arctic wikiproject and portal are fairly new entities, only been around for around and bout half a year, so it is nice to have more involvement. Kind Regards. I almost missed the note aobut the Seamounts portal I will have to pop by and have a peek. You make cute Thank you squares. That must have taken some time to do.SriMesh | talk 02:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Barnstar

Thank you for making a design that is both simple and compatible with my toolbar's design. Here's a barnstar!

The Excellent Userpage Award
For going through the ancient backlog of Trading Spaces and fixing the design on my userpage I award Resident Mario the Userpage Barnstar. Valley2city‽ 18:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


Thanks again Valley2city‽ 18:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)










Booyah!!! Resident Mario (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. Resident Mario (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Non-commercial images

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Orca Seamount TopographyCrop.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. B (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Please see the message above. Images that permit only a "non-commercial use" license are not permitted on Wikipedia. --B (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Also, when you create an image that is a derivative work of another image, your license of choice may be no less restrictive than the license of the source image. For example, you based File:Seamount 2.svg on File:Volcano.svg, which is multilicensed under version 1.2 or later of the GFDL, as well as the the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5, Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 and Attribution ShareAlike 1.0 licenses. You may choose to license your image under any any one or more of these. You were not granted the authority under these licenses to create a public domain derivative work and as such, calling your work public domain is a copyright violation. Please go through your image uploads and any of them that are derivative works, fix their licenses to be no less restrictive than those of the source images. --B (talk) 13:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Orbs

I have nominated Category:Orbs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. B (talk) 13:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Obsene
I AM NEVER UPLOADING ANOTHER SHITY IMAGE AGAIN. OR ASKING AN ADMIN TO DO ME A SMALL FAVOR. GO STICK YOUR <mute></mute> AUTOGEN TEMPLATES ON SOMEONE ELSE'S PAGE. Resident Mario (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Userpage Questions Response

Sorry for the late response. THe purpose of the overflow/ auto thing is to make the scroll bar. To make a box without the scroll bar just remove the "div style" part in the contents (at least this is how my page is set up). Also, I have also encountered probelms with two scroll bars lately. SOmetimes I have them and sometimes I don't. I really don't know why and can't help you on that one. I hope I have answered you questons to the best of my ability. Please ask if you do have any more questions. Btw, thank you for the compliments. Your userpage is preety good too. I especially like your talk page.    World   tcs 22:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. You know, you have the best userpage I've seen in all my time around here. Resident Mario (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I actually don't know how the numbers work. I copied the moon template. All I really know is that the numbers help with the placing of the object. I have a time userbox in my other userboxes subpage showing the sane thin. I suggest asking the creator about that    World   tcs 15:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Userpage

I got it all switched over and now I'll just add some finishing touches. Thanks so much! Vantine84 (talk) 06:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Resident Mario, I just wanted to say thanks for the words of support on my talk page. I'll definitely use this as a learning experience. Vantine84 (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Asinara

Yes, I'm reviewing this. The printer somehow didn't print page two (I do the reviews offline before I copy them over), so it can take a bit longer than planned. - Mgm|(talk) 05:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know

You said this is your first Did You Know nomination, so you may want to try out my new explanation of Did You Know rules, starting here. Art LaPella (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm also looking for a newcomer's perspective at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Proposed rewrite of the rules. Did You Know regulars can talk about what they think newcomers would understand more easily, but you could tell us directly. Art LaPella (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I copied the barnstar to my user page. Art LaPella (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! Yes, I like it now that I see it that way. I don't know what the red printable link means; if you were printing, I would think you would print "OnePage". Also, Wikipedia's normal section heading capitalization is described at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Section headings. Art LaPella (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I moved the entire Learning DYK system to Wikipedia space, and I'm about to link it to WP:DYK and T:TDYK. I found that 2 pages were missing from my site map, and therefore missing from Onepage. I added Wikipedia:Did you know/Multiple articles to Onepage. I didn't add Wikipedia:Did you know/Sources for DYK articles to Onepage, because that's when I noticed you weren't simply copying everything. Art LaPella (talk) 07:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Asinara reviewed

I've reviewed the article, and I'm sad to say that I had to fail it. I've left comments on the article talk page. My most pressing recommendation is that you should seek input from the Guild of Copy Editors. The sources themselves contain some wonky English so it's better to rely on some grammar and style experts rather than non-native speakers. I've also identified several potential omissions. I hope you'll be able to improve the article further. :) - Mgm|(talk) 09:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Asinara

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Asinara, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Yay!! My first DYK! And the lead hook, too. ResMar 17:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Batch 2

Thanks for uploading File:Loihi 3d.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I believe I have fixed this copyright. Viriditas (talk) 01:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

It was marked as "Work of Government Agency"- what happened? Ah, but the new one is better- more specific. ResMar 01:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, it was also tagged for deletion because the information wasn't complete. I tracked it down to NOAA's support ship, so the problem is solved. Viriditas (talk) 01:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I am stupid, I swear, not including copyright info AND forgetting the description. Thanks for filling it out. ResMar 01:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries. Even the original image you copied from de.wikipedia.org didn't have this information. I will copy it over there for them right now so nobody on de has to worry about it. Viriditas (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Yay!! Prose size (text only): 10453 B (1638 words) "readable prose size" and 5.02 expand on Calculator. Unless my numbers are wrong, I just passed the threshhold for DYK. ResMar 01:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 

Document statistics: 
   * File size: 68 kB
   * Prose size (including all HTML code): 17 kB
   * References (including all HTML code): 16 kB
   * Wiki text: 18 kB
   * Prose size (text only): 10 kB (1638 words) "readable prose size"
   * References (text only): 2578 B

No, there appears to still be someways to go. Good night, it's time for me to leave. ResMar 02:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 

13 February 2009 document statistics: 
   * File size: 59 kB
   * Prose size (including all HTML code): 4803 B
   * References (including all HTML code): 3368 B
   * Prose size (text only): 2079 B (336 words) "readable prose size"
   * References (text only): 896 B

Help!

Hey Res, how's it going? I recently made some changes to my user page and screwed it up. Basically, I added a new "Projects" section and it made a huge blank space in the table. Can you fix it? Also, in the "About Me" section, I tried to add a direct link for creating a new section on my talk page, but I couldn't figure it out. Any suggestions? Thanks! — Levi van Tine (t – c) 06:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, you're the best! — Levi van Tine (t – c) 07:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Seamount

Hiya man! I obviously (and the rest of us) appreciate your creation and work on Seamounts. It's created recently (and that's cool!) But didn't know if you might like some help in improving it a tad? I have a very simple rule: I don't tread on other peoples projects; It's a complete respect thing! But I am very good at what I do, and I have an excellent track record! I also have a vested interest in Seamonts presentation for the Cape Verde Project (mine et al). I genuinely hope you'll allow me to assist you in your endeavours on this Project.

Yours Sincerely - Wiki User 68 Blah Stuff 21:25, 05 March 2009 (UTC)

Leave it to me my friend, it'll be CRACKIN! Let me know what you think afterwards - and if you're not happy with anything, talk to me and we'll sort it! Have a great weekend, cheers. Wiki User 68 Blah Stuff 21:37, 05 March 2009 (UTC)
(Laughter) Yes I am. OK, I'll start this week end. Keep an eye on my progress! I WILL be having "Open" Info-Boxes that I will want Wikipedians to contribute to. That of-course goes without saying! Thanks for the feed back and have a good one. Wiki User 68 Blah Stuff 21:32, 44 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Work Group

Milhist has not embraced those for some reason, so you'd have to create your own in a user space and move from there. As a side note, the Iowa class work group isn't actually closed, its just less active now that the core articles are united under one FT. TomStar81 (Talk) 02:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I need to ask for clarification: by topics, do you mean work groups or were thinking more like task forces? TomStar81 (Talk) 22:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The article collections that can be made into Featured Topics and Good Topics. ResMar 23:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, we are talking featured topics. Ok, then, I guess I was a little slow catching on to that part (too much school work). If you are aiming for featured topic then "Volcanoes of Hawaii" would work perfectly. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Just using that as an example... (hmm, maybe) so there isn't exactly any list of topics or anything, right? You can just pick a category? ResMar 23:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Well you can't just throw a bunch of articles together and call it a topic, you have to demonstrate that the articles are somehow connected to each other. If you can fulfill that requirement then yes, you can just pick a category. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Helping Hand Barnstar
ResMar, on behalf of Wikipedians everywhere, I present you with this barnstar in recognition of your excellent work in making newcomers feel welcome and helping with our issues. Keep up the good work! — Levi van Tine (t – c) 09:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Selection criterion for DYK

Please see Template_talk:Did_you_know#Richard_C._Mangrum.[3] I am a bit disappointed that, perhaps due to your comments that the article was too short, it did not make it to DYK. You indicated that it was 662 characters and that it needed more to reach 1500 "lines of text". Perhaps it was my mistake in the comment that said "199 characters", by which I meant the hook was 199 characters, not the article. However, as you reviewed the article, it is clear that you found it to be more than 199 characters.

The DYK criterion for length is "minimum of 1,500 characters of prose" - that is characters, not words, not lines. The article has been is well over 3000 characters. Your number of 662 refers to words. (Wiki indicates 1800 words, when you remove tables, lists, etc, it is in the range of your assessment.) — ERcheck (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Counter boo boo ouch! OK, so I messed up. Who says it didn't make it though; it's still on the quene. Let's not start a big fight over this, OK? ResMar 15:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
No fight intended. Just letting you know for future reference when you review other articles. We're all human and make mistakes. What makes us a community on Wikipedia is working together to improve things — which is why I pointed it out to you. Have a good day! — ERcheck (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
No, it's totally my fualt. I can't seem to get DYK right. OK, I'll shut up now. ResMar 15:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Loihi

I focus primarily on volcano/earthquake articles, so I can definitely help you out. It's nice to have someone else other than Mikenorton, Black Tusk, and Editorofthewiki to help. :) Ceranthor 22:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Workgroup

Can you talk a little more (on my talk page if you like) about what you are trying to do? It seems like you are more interested in putting together a featured topic than an actual workgroup. Tell me what you are trying to do. Viriditas (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Resident Mario. You have new messages at Viriditas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Loihi Seamount

Updated DYK query On March 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Loihi Seamount, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Royalbroil 02:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, good job on the DYK! :) Viriditas (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Now that sucks! It was online while I was sleeping. Ahh well. ResMar 18:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Just finished

...working on my DYK, so I will be able to help soon. Viriditas (talk) 22:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Can't get to it just yet, but I'm going to try and work on Loihi Seamount later. 11 references for a GA doesn't seem like enough. Viriditas (talk)

Cookie!

download has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!



-download | sign! 02:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiLove

MathCool10 Sign here! has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Batch 3

Kilauea

I've started work on it—allow me some time, I'll be able to get it to GA within two weeks (its huge)! Ceranthor 01:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Pie!

Thanks for the pie! Much appreciated. -download | sign! 00:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Loihi Seamount

It's lunchtime, so I need to step away for a little bit, but why don't you plan on submitting it for GA at the end of the day on March 17th or the beginning of the 18th? I think we can get enough done by that time where it will pass with flying colors. Does that sound good? Meanwhile, you should continue to seek peer reviews from the seamount, geology, Hawaii, and Volcanoes projects, because that will increase your chances of getting it up to FA. Viriditas (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

FA? I doubt it. Maybe...meah. ResMar 22:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Wait a second, weren't you trying to go for a featured topic? Viriditas (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I though you mean the article. Yeah, I might go to FT, emphasisi on might. The rules say that 33% of the articles must be FA not neccisarily all of them. ResMar 22:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I did, but thanks for letting me know. Anyway, off to lunch, I'll be back soon. Viriditas (talk) 22:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I left you some more comments and requests, and I found you the link to the book on Gbooks. Viriditas (talk) 02:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Date field in images

FYI... you used the current date of your upload in all of your image date fields instead of the date the photograph was taken. :) Viriditas (talk) 11:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Description and file name for File:PiscesV.jpg was wrong, so I fixed what I could. Viriditas (talk) 11:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you specify the URL of the page using File:Pisces V.jpg? Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Nevermind, found and fixed it. Viriditas (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

We need the original NOAA or HURL or whatever site link for File:Loihi bot.jpg, as the page you cite is copyrighted by the journal. I'm going to temporarily remove that image until we get it. Viriditas (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

GAC for Loihi Seamount

Please don't submit it before 18 March. Lead section and details of history still have problems; I've added new comments to the talk page. But, we should be able to fix these by the 18th. At least I hope we can! :) Viriditas (talk) 11:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Hey, the article is looking good. I've requested the addition of seamount to the lead section. I disagree with you about the red links and the see also sections, but I've closed out those discussions since it's really not important right now. Please plan on submitting this to GAC on or around 00:00, 18 March 2009 (or anytime after that, hours or days) Thanks! Viriditas (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Boston (talk) has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

My "the" page

Hi, I notice you've transcluded it. The problem is, it's very much work in progress, and I'll be fixing it little-by-little over the next month. In any case, I've moved the title to "User:Tony1/How to use "the" and "a" in English. I've requested that the shorter, original title be deleted. Tony (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Jackpot

I thought you might like to know that I finally found all of the information we will ever need about Loihi, and it is all online thanks to the USGS. I'll attempt to add the links in an hour or so. But this basically answers all of the questions on the talk page. :) Viriditas (talk) 08:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice work on adding the Garcia material. :) Viriditas (talk) 07:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I think you should submit it for GAC. Between the time that you submit it and the time it takes to get someone to review it, we will have the bugs worked out. Viriditas (talk) 01:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
47 kilobytes! Wow!  :) Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Good work. There is a quite a backlog on GAC, so that gives us plenty of time to make improvements, so kick back and relax. :) Viriditas (talk) 08:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Galapagos hotspot

Hi, thanks for the comments on this article, I will have see if I can find something to put in for a DYK on it. Wikigillie (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination, I did put one on, but it seemed to have gone. May have put it in the wrong place as had it on the expanded on the 18th March subsection. Not to worry your one is there and verified. Forgot to say yesterday, well done on the Hawaii hotspot expansion, I used some of your theory section in mine. Wikigillie (talk) 09:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Um

What's the thinking behind this? Wikipedia guidelines and policies belong in Wikipedia-space, not user-space. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Hid the cats, page stalker :P It's a collection of high-end essays and guidelines. ResMar 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

User Page?

I was just wondering if the edit you made to User: Hmrox was vandalism. The edit summary was: Done!
If it wasn't, please undo my revert!

--Edward130603 (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Hawaii hotspot

Root
Happy to have a look at this page and put any comments on the article talk page, I had better go and read the GA guidelines. :) Wikigillie (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! ResMar 16:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments on the article talk page, sorry it took me a while to get the time to have a read throughWikigillie (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I will try Hombre ocho del hacha (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC).

Now that the above is blocked, he's got a new one: Hatchetguyfed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 23:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Ain't that amusing? ResMar 13:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
It took me awhile to figure out that "fed" was another way of saying "ate". In any case, he's now been officially pushed away from the table, to the tune of a "big banned". Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 14:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Akhamenehpour

Akhamenehpour (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

You posted an indef-block on his page, but if I'm reading the block log correctly, he's only blocked for the next 3 days. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 23:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. ResMar 23:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
He was indef-blocked though, before. ResMar 23:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Cross Seamount

Is the DYK hook in the article Cross Seamount? Per DYK Rules, the hook has to be in the article and has to be referenced. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 14:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Replied on yor talk. ResMar 14:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hawaii hotspot

I'm online for the next 1-2 hours if you want to talk about the articles. Viriditas (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

We're doing OK so far. Loihi's still in backlog, I just finsihed Hawaii hotspot and it's at GAN, and I've added 5k to Kohala. It's nice to have you on at the same time, as we're in totally different time zones. But I want to discuss peer reviewing Evolution of Hawaiian volcanoes and Kohala (mountain) to close them up for the FT. It's not that there's a lack of good information, but everything I can find on the evolution of Hawaiian volcanoes is a copy of the USGS site. As for Kohala, whenever I search for it, I'me polluted by tourist sites, all forks of the USGS entry or Wikipedia. Apparently people haven't found the extinct volcano very exiting, and there's a chronic lack of one-paged information; it's all in little bits and peices everywhere, mostly restating the same things. I tried narrowing down the tourist sites for both using Scirus, but it returned very little that I could use. If you can help me track down any info, I'de greatly appreciate it. ResMar 00:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
in fact, for Kohala, 98% of what I did get was sci paper on other Hawaiian volcanoes citing the volcano somewhere in their first lines or so. ResMar 00:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok, so my task is to research Kohala then? Just want to get clear on what needs to be done. Viriditas (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Not necisarily, but yes, I'm having trouble with findng info. And as I learned from my collab with you on Loihi, you're good at finding motheloads of info. Perhaps I'll try to dig the book. ResMar 00:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Did you download volumes 1 and 2? I'm not sure you need to, but let me check my PDF's real quick... Viriditas (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
in fact, for Kohala, 98% of what I did get is sci papers on other Hawaiian volcanoes citing the volcano somewhere in their first lines or so. Gosh. ResMar 00:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I'll try and come up with something. I probably won't have any results for you until later tonight or tomorrow. Viriditas (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
It'll take an epic effort to dig out the info from such a heapish volume, but it's worth it. Thanks Viriditas! BTW, I'm trying to organize a group discussion. ResMar 00:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Dawm! None of the others are on. ResMar 00:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Are you in Germany? Viriditas (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Ummmmmmmmmmmm..............No........I live in New York City. My great-great-aunt was German though, I think. ResMar 00:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm on. :) Ceranthor 00:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Hehehehe...ok. I'll try and get up early tomorrow and share whatever I can find. Try volume 1 of the PDF book and look at the table of contents. Looks like there should be something useful there. Viriditas (talk) 00:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
My mom is yelling at me to get my ass off the computer. I might not be staying long. ResMar 00:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I'll take on Kohala as well. Doesn't look too bad. Kilauea should be done first, though. Ceranthor 00:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Great, we can all collab on it. ResMar 00:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, I'll spend a bit of time tommorow intergrating the first chapter, first book into evel and hotspot. ResMar 00:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
G2G, bye ResMar 00:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Have you looked at using MacDonald (1993) in Kohala? Page numbers are 58, 150, 152, 267, 303, 345, 353, 356, 358, and 359. Let me know if you don't have access to any of those on GBooks, and I'll fill in the blanks. Viriditas (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Just checked out Volume 1 of Volcanism in Hawaii. Lots of good information there, including Chapter 1 and Chapter 7. Viriditas (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll have more for you later. Viriditas (talk) 13:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Vidatras. I can't get to this until I finish intergrating the book into Hawaii hotspot, though. ResMar 21:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I may have some time tomorrow. Plus, Avenue and I have located a fantastic source that is relatively recent (2007) and will help improve the radiometric dating material. Viriditas (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Ah, witholding it from me? Tell me what it is!! ResMar 18:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I think he means USGS Open-File Report 2007-1089, or more specifically this pamphlet. -- Avenue (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Galápagos hotspot

Updated DYK query On 31 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Galápagos hotspot, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice work! I just saw it on the main page and it looks great! :) Viriditas (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Kilaeua~

I need to get Cerro Azul (Chile volcano) to a higher quality. It can easily be made FA, with some effort. Thus said, I will be focusing on this prior to working on Kilauea. You can always help! :) And thanks so much for the compliment on Ruiz—I'm proud that I didn't make those peoples' lives worthless. Outside of organizational and educational facilities, it is practically unknown. Ceranllama chat post 21:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

I'de help you, but...I have too many comitments at the time. ResMar 23:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Batch 4

Possibly unfree File:Detroit Seamount Bathymetric.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Detroit Seamount Bathymetric.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 22:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC) --NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 22:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Maybe could try some of the links mentioned here, specifically the mail address that seems to mentioned when dealing with copyright issues is permissions-en@wikimedia.org. I hope this helps, if not send me another message and I'll check further. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 23:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm way ahead of you my friend. I pursued the EarthRef copyright debate several weeks ago on the copyright discussion board. We can't use any of their files because they aren't free enough.  ;-( Viriditas (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Rats :( They're such good images... ResMar 00:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Great, just finished expanding Detroit Seamount for a DYK. ResMar 00:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
g2g. ResMar 00:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, it looks like someone added another comment to the discussion that I didn't see, saying we might be able to use them if they meet non-free content criteria. You can see my original query here. Viriditas (talk) 04:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
I think we're going to need an OTRS ticket for this; pity I have'nt a clue how that system works.
It's fairly simple. There is a main e-mail address that queries are sent to, and that's about it. But unless the original copyright holder can release the image through OTRS, I don't see a reason to use it. Viriditas (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Something tells me they would be willing to liscence it under CC. In other news, I've created that template you wanted. ResMar 00:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Heh, that is beyond cool. Nice job! Viriditas (talk) 00:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Lol, I've hit 30x expansion on Hawaii hotspot, and 4.5x since it was sent for GAN. There's just such an infinite amount of info to add... ResMar 21:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
65.6k, up from 3. ResMar 22:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Wikipedians opposed to date-autoformatting

Category:Wikipedians opposed to date-autoformatting, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 06:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Cross Seamount

Updated DYK query On April 5, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cross Seamount, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Shubinator (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


RE: Application Userpage Design Center

If you could just code it for me in Blackbox style, that'd be great. --Dragonshardz (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC) ~! Done. ResMar 23:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Loihi Seamount

Hi, I am reviewing your article Loihi Seamount for GA and have entered a few comments at Talk:Loihi Seamount/GA1. It looks like an excellent article and I do not anticipate any problems. I hope you don't mind if I copy edit minor problems I see, as it is easier to do that than to compile a list. Let me know if that is a problem. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any problems or concerns. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 18:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Problem with dates

'Garcia dates Loihi, the newest volcano, to 400,000 years. But according to the Wikipedia articles, Kīlauea, Hualālai, and Mauna Kea are all younger!

I'm not exactly sure what you are saying. Can you give me the specific examples so I can deal with them directly? My guess is that you are referring to the "age of rock" field in the infobox. Is that correct? If so, that number is independent of the age of the volcano itself, but these articles all need to be updated anyway, as others may come away with the same impression you describe. You may want to take a look at USGS Open-File Report 2007-1089 and the pamphlet we discussed on Talk:Kohala (mountain). They seem to be using either the same or newer data than Garcia. Viriditas (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
That's exactly what confused me. The use of "oldest dated rock" via "estimated age" is independant, I guess. ResMar 19:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
You are right, it is very confusing, and we probably need to figure out a way to deal with it. My guess is we should start on Template talk:Infobox Mountain. Viriditas (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Goodness, it does have a nice load of information! ResMar 20:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to be offline for a bit, but I'll try and check-in later. Viriditas (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see now! USGS talks about the point at which the volcano rose out of the sea, the phamplet and Garcia go back to the beginning of the volcanoes development! This is quite a mishap. I'll try and go around and updatethe new information. ResMar 20:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Cool, let me know what happens. Viriditas (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm posting on Template talk:Infobox Mountain about this. ResMar 20:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Actually, the phamplet is not as specific as it is for Kohala for the other ones... ResMar 20:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Apparently, the paper was worth 6k to Kohala. Great find! ResMar 23:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
As always, searching the USGS database pays off, big time. I found this and two good images, so far.
Good work. I'll try and do some research later tomorrow night. I'll also help you out with preparing Loihi for FAC. Viriditas (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I spent and hour fine-lining the article, and in my opinion it looks set. My biggest worry is FA technical complience. ResMar 17:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Can you talk a little bit more about what you mean by "technical compliance"? If so, I can address the issues before you nominate it for FAC. I have an entirely different set of concerns, starting with the prose quality and whether the article has been written entirely without copying and pasting from other sites. I'm going to ask another editor to run their copyright software program to see if it picks up anything. Viriditas (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
See User_talk:Viriditas#Loihi_Seamount. No copyright issues, but if you remember, I removed "rocked" and you added it back in. Did that website copy the Wikipedia article? Geronimo20 seems to think they copied the article to their website (mirrored) a few weeks after you wrote it so it looks ok, but you might want to revisit the sources to make sure. Viriditas (talk) 11:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
One thing that might come up is whether there are any differences between the online, pre-print version of Garcia's paper that you use in the article, and the published version. Can you contact Garcia by e-mail and find out? He will probably send you the final, published version in PDF if you request it. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 01:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
We should also try to either incorporate more of the further reading sources into the current article, or trim them down if we don't need them. My concern with FAC is that we aren't using enough sources. Have we covered the entire topic? My guess is we probably touched on 90 percent, but we should try and cover all aspects of the subject. Can you think of any you missed? One way to approach this is to break it down by subtopic. First, can you think of any aspect of seamount research, such as important classifications and data that were left out of the current article? Viriditas (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't saying the article wasn't long enough. I was asking if you thought it was comprehensive. I see you have answered my question on my talk page. Viriditas (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, you seem pretty confident, so why don't you nominate it? Viriditas (talk) 22:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Detroit Seamount

Updated DYK query On April 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Detroit Seamount, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Victuallers (talk) 20:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Pleasure doing buissness with you :) ResMar 20:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Hawaii taskforce

First, I've been seeing your massive edits on my watchlist - thanks for all of your hard work. I just joined your Hawaiian volcanism taskforce; do you think it would be a good idea to move it from your userspace to an "official" taskforce within WikiProject Volcanoes? Awickert (talk) 05:50, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Another userpage question

Hey ResMar, how's it going? I have another userpage question. My articles list is getting pretty long. Can I make the main page only show a portion of what I've worked on? Like, one smaller table, for instance? — Levi van Tine (t – c) 13:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Ya like, I want the main page to show just my current projects, a half dozen articles or so. But I want to keep all the records on one page, namely Vantine84/Articles. On the Articles page, can I make more than one table and have the main page only display one? — Levi van Tine (t – c) 14:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Cookies!

Thanks, you're the best! has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.


To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

— Levi van Tine (t – c) 06:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Koko Guyot

Updated DYK query On April 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Koko Guyot, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Dravecky (talk) 06:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

You have new messages at my talk page

Hello, Resident Mario. You have new messages at The Obento Musubi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cheers, obentomusubi 19:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Finally done

I think I'm ready to start. I'll go around an do a copyedit of Loihi. Ceranllama chat post 21:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Great! Um, Loihi or Kilauea? ResMar 22:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I'll be expanding Kilauea and pushing 1968 Illinois earthquake to FA. Tomorrow I'll get in a research session. Ceranllama chat post 01:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Nintoku Seamount

Updated DYK query On 22 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nintoku Seamount, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Dravecky (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


Asinara Copy-Edits

As you requested here I did some copy edits of your work at the Asinaria article. The first half reads well and needed only minor tweaking. The second half reads like someone worked too late into the night, since there are contradictory or repetitive statements and less clarity overall. I can't correct these without doing the source reading. I've tagged the sentences/paras that need attention. If you can clarify these I'd be happy to come back & do the copy-edits! --Whoosit (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Huh? Oh yeah. That... ResMar 19:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Loihi bot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rum

While I may make the occasional contribution to the article, I have for the most part moved on to other interests over the past few years. If you do attempt to take this article to FA then I should warn you the issue that finally sunk the last attempt was attempting to track down "production and sales" information for rum. While you should expect a request for this information during any FAC review, tracking down published information may not be possible. The issue is that Bacardi, the world's largest rum producer, is a privately held company that does not release sales or production data. Without this information it is unlikely that the article will be promoted to FA status. --Allen3 talk 13:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Deep sea

Hi I've found this article and considering this it makes up most of the world other than the atmosphere the article is very poor. I wondered whether there might be something that you could add to it due to your expertise in seamounts. Thanks Smartse (talk) 23:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Generally the reason these types of articles go mostly un-noticed is because they are too broad, per se, and require a lot of meticulous work to improve. If you plan to contribute to the article I can help you, but at the moment I'm a little tied down with a rather large project of mine. My association with seamounts stems from my association with volcanology, so I'm not really an expert on that deal. If you want to improve the article, you'll probably need to go the library and take out a few books; I've learned that that's the best approach with broad subjects. How far do you you want it to go? (sorry if it seems like I'm throwing you off, but I'm really busy right now) ResMar 23:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks, decided to have a go myself! I like yours as well-very nice.dottydotdot (talk) 19:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you :) ResMar 19:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Resident_Mario/Archive_1&oldid=1258073765"