User talk:Relis333

December 2022

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Paula White—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, who makes the decisions about what is constructive? About what is significant? Basically, who decides what information is/isn't being included on these Wikipedia pages? I deleted information because it appeared derisive toward Paula White. It's clear that Wikipedia editors have an agenda while trying to appear as unbiased. Relis333 (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Individual editors patrol changes voluntarily. If they find a change to be likely unconstructive, they can revert it and inform the editor. The editor may then also choose to reply with an explanation of what they changed and why they changed it, citing relevant policies. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. BD2412 T 19:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Picking up the attack against User:Zaathras right where User:HurricaneOcean left off is quite a tell. BD2412 T 19:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Willing to burn an at-the-time unidentified sock just to get in a one-line insult? That certainly is a flex. Zaathras (talk) 21:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]