User talk:Redcap78

April 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Aalisha Panwar, from its old location at User:Redcap78/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses Hello, Can you go through the Draft:Aalisha Panwar and check whether it is suitable for Moving to Article space. If yes then help in moving to article space as the article listed in blacklist and it is difficult to move it in article space. (Redcap78 (talk) 06:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC))[reply]

I can't override the title blacklist. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation request for Aalisha Panwar

Hello, I request Wikipedia Can you Please me help in creating this article. I have already Created the Draft:Aalisha Panwar few days back but Since Panwar name is in Wikipedia Blacklist only experienced editor can remove that. I request the Wikipedia administrator to check it as the subject matter follows the guidelines of Notability and is worthy for moving to Article space.(Redcap78 (talk) 05:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Help

Please help Rashbhari page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasbhari Rajueagle (talk) 16:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent Reviewing as per process of Works Done timeline

Following Drafts needs an reviewing according to timeline and perspective of Works been done till now. Furthermore, the Category sighted and References used passes the notability guidelines as per Wikipedia.

Since, the pages had been blacklist only the reviewing admin can help. Redcap78 (talk)

I dream of horses Hey, can you go through the above mentioned adherent topics and help or inform the admin of particular areas for making respective and suggestive changes and helping it the draft grow as article.Redcap78 (talk)

@Premeditated Chaos, The Blade of the Northern Lights, Anthony Appleyard, RHaworth, Ansh666, TonyBallioni, Cirt, Gogo Dodo, Diannaa, and David Eppstein: Here are the admins that have previously deleted the articles. I'm sure they're willing to help. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 04:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: Hey, can you go through the above mentioned Drafts once again. Redcap78 (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, I don't do draft review/AfC. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Hey, the above draft had been re-edited as per Wikipedia guidelines. Can you go through once again. Redcap78 (talk) 16:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Redcap78, there’s no deadline on when to submit or create an article of your choice so what’s the haste? In due time your article would be reviewed. Hey @I dream of horses, Premeditated Chaos do you have any idea why this editor wants their articles reviewed earlier than usual? Your guess is as good as mine. Celestina007 18:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, but if I had to guess without I'd assume they're being paid and there's a deadline. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007, it's inevitable they're being paid. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 18:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely feels like it. My gut instinct once I got the ping from them. Celestina007 (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the queries has been taken to far in conversation. Following the Wikipedia guidelines. The subject Matter notability in India is valued but subject in Wikipedia is in blacklist so I can't override it. So I ping the fellow editors who deals with this problem. But if the article is going to take time for review I am going to wait for that @Celestina007 and @Premeditated Chaos. Redcap78 (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slashes

Hi there, please avoid using slashes in prose like you did here. Slashes are ambiguous, and readers aren't going to intuitively know what you are trying to communicate. If an actor replaced another actor, that information should be written up somewhere, likely in the character description. Also, per WP:TVCAST, new cast members are added chronologically to the bottom of the list, so this slash business isn't consistent with community guidelines.

While a seemingly trivial matter, this is a huge problem largely in Indian television articles, where people rarely expend the effort to write in complete sentences and thoughts. It just promotes ignorance instead of clarity, communication and quality. As a worst-case scenario, look at this version of a different article, and try to conceive of all the things Giaa Manek/Rubina Dilaik as Jeannie/Jenu/Chutki/Rajjo Ji/Jwala/Roopa/Mrs.Khanna (2012-2013)/(2013-2014) could possibly mean.

Did Gia Manek change her name to Rubina Dilaik? Are these two actors who worked at the same time? Did they work intermittently depending on who was available? Did one replace the other? Are all those names after the "as" unique characters? The same character but with different nicknames? Are they nonuplets? What's with the parentheticals separated by slashes? Are they trying to say that Manek had this/these roles from 2012-2013, but then Dilaik took over from 2013-2014? Or does it mean that both actors worked until some point in 2013, then were pulled from the show and then came back later in 2013?

Hopefully you can see the problem. Thanks for your consideration. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:Hy,I got your point but in many previous Indian Television articles like this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balika_Vadhu slashes had been used to denote the actor that replaced other actor.

Since, Meer Ali replaced the other character so it's been placed there. Redcap78 (talk) 04:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Safarnama (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Safarnama (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akshay Mhatre (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This doesn't pass WP:NACTOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akshay Mhatre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Akshay Mhatre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redcap78! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheen Dass (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Honestly, I think this is a borderline case, given her starring in multiple shows. However, it's hung up on the fact that she doesn't pass WP:CREATIVE (or otherwise WP:GNG) due to a lack of significant coverage about her. Sure, there are plenty of short articles verifying her being in a show, but there's no real in-depth coverage one would see in a notable individual (i.e. everything is rather run-of-the-mill "let's talk to the show cast" coverage). Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheen Dass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sheen Dass, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dishank Arora (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References are either interviews (WP:PRIMARY), run-of-the-mill show announcements, or one-line mentions. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dishank Arora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dishank Arora, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dishank Arora

Hello, Redcap78. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dishank Arora, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dishank Arora

Hello, Redcap78. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dishank Arora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Awards

This message is regarding your recent edit on Mahima Makwana. Please read WP:FILMCRITICLIST. Zee Rishtey Awards doesn't have a page, it is just redirected to Zee TV. The page got deleted last year due to non-notability [1]. In simple words, if an award has it's own page on Wikipedia than it could be added otherwise not. Hence, in-house awards like most channel awards are non-notable on Wikipedia and aren't considered. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or visit The Help desk or you may leave a message on my talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain: No, there's not any problem. Although Few years back "Zee Rishtey Aawrds" had it's own page. Thanks for informing about the in-house Award and notability error. (Redcap78 (talk) 09:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, Zee Rishtey Awards had it's page till last year, but got deleted due to non-notability. So since then, it's not considered notable anymore. ManaliJain (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats ! Himanshi Baghel ^Talk? 06:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello Redcap78. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Redcap78. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Redcap78|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello@Rosguill. I am oblige from wikipedia rules and regulations and respect the privacy. No, I haven't been compensated for any kind of edits. Though, I have created the article from neutral point of view. The supposed user @Israrhashim1 [2] had ulter the point of view regularly followed by unknown users [3].Supposedly, I contest for deletion of the article Sumbul Touqeer Khan. It will be helpful. Thank you. Redcap78 (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hijra (South Asia) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 13:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hijra (South Asia) into LGBT history in India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I have added the attribution in edit summary. Redcap78 (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on LGBT history in India

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page LGBT history in India, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Showtime (Indian TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Showtime (Indian TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 21:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Showtime (Indian TV series)

The article Showtime (Indian TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Redcap78. Thank you for your work on Showtime (Indian TV series). Another editor, C1K98V, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Add the Reception section. Thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|C1K98V}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]