Jump to content

User talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Hello, my name is Angel, and like you I am a fan of anime, mangas and b movies. I would love to see more of your editing, see ya.

Cafe Kichijoji de

 Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to Geocities in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information.

Also, fanlistings are not allowed.

Thanks for uploading Image:Godricgryffindorcard.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Wallflower

I'm slightly interested in doing the episode summaries, however I disagree with a lot of the english translation of the ep titles. What should we do about it? - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 05:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Godricgryffindorcard.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Godricgryffindorcard.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SalazarSlytherincard.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SalazarSlytherincard.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RanmaruWallflower.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:RanmaruWallflower.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:CafeKichijoujiDe.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:TakenagaOda.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:WallflowerTakano.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Momma's Boys

On this talk page, you suggested adding some kind of guides to disambiguate between the show Momma's Boys and other articles with similar names. Besides Mama's Boys (the heavy metal band from Northern Ireland), did you find any other articles with similar names? (If there are only two articles with similar names, I would try a different strategy than if there were three or more articles with similar names.) I can put in the links to help people find the article they are looking for if you let me know if there are any other articles with names like this. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Proflayton2box.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Proflayton2box.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Just in case someone didn't already say it...

Welcome, it's nice to have you here! Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Brianna Stewart

FYI, overzealous deletions with hyperbolas claims are also frowned upon. Don't be so quick to delete information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emlodik (talk • contribs) 15:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll add that page to my watchlist. As you probably know, dynamic IPs like that are very hard to stop. For now we can just revert. If it continues, we could always protect the page. I'm running into that on Lorena Bernal. IP keeps adding [1]. It's unsourced fancruft. But the IP has a different IP address every day so it's hard to deal with. Anyway. I'll help out as much as I can. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 11:16, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'm hopefully going to have time to look at this article tommorrow. Looks a bit of an unreferenced mess about a rather eccentric person - Peripitus (Talk) 11:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Fiore1.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Fiore1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY (TALK) 06:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Nice work getting photo permission

Nice work, and respectable, encyclopedic photo. Congrads.[2] Piano non troppo (talk) 09:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiore1.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fiore1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Laurell-headshot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Laurell-headshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Laurell-headshot.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laurell-headshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ChikyuMisaki.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ChikyuMisaki.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GuruGuru.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GuruGuru.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

SOS and the dub

I leave the dub pages alone because like the dub they are a mess and scare me. But I posted comments anyhow. I'm more of the in-house Sailor Moon reference queen. Malkiann deals with out-of-Sailor Moon references more than I do. Mine crashed sometime around 9/11. TT--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 00:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:IWGPV1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IWGPV1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:KoromoGN.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KoromoGN.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at Mr. Vernon's talk page.
Message added 14:51, 27 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr. Vernon (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at Gabe.loggins's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cool! or u can tell me what to do and I will try my best! it's my first article and I seem to have screwed it up a good bit. sigh. stubs and other articles with a lot less content have made it in... it can be disheartening. Gabe.loggins (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anjwalker (talk) 10:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Vandals, etc.

I've warned off Art at loggerhead and User talk:129.21.107.111. If it continues then maybe I or another admin will block. Neutralitytalk 05:47, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Archolman, AfD nomination advise.

Thanks very much for your help, & I hope I can return the favour one day! :) Archolman User talk:Archolman 01:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at I Jethrobot's talk page.
Message added 09:18, 11 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 09:18, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at ToniSant's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For continual work of the highest quality on AfD, always offering a well-researched and thoughtful opinion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I actually came here to award you the very same thing, but say that Chiswick got to you first. I also want to express appreciation for your always well-thought-out opinions. Congratulations! Neutralitytalk 00:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

CRAZY GIRL SHIN BIA

My name is Anthony Durrant, and I should tell you that one of the sites I chose for my article on the manwha Crazy Girl Shin Bia is actually not an online manga site, it leads to a page with information on that manhwa and is Number Two on the page. You are right, the online manga sites are of questionable legality and I have had some worries about whether or not I should be using them. In return for your kind advice, I should like the opportunity to edit one of your articles in the future.Glammazon (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

BAKA-UPDATES

The site I was referring to in my last post is called Baka-Updates and its URL is MangaUpdates.com. It is an online encyclopedia with entries featuring various manga and manhwa that I use when I want to look up information on a specific manga. One of these entries is for the manhwa, CRAZY GIRL SHIN BIA.Glammazon (talk) 19:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coffee Express Co.

Hi, you edited my article for creation "Coffee Express Co." You told me to find more significant articles. I have listed some significant articles as reference, and will try to find more. Do you suggest I completely remove any insignificant articles? I was just trying to add as many references as possible. I was also using other similar coffee roaster pages as a guide (Zingerman's, Intelligentsia), so I don't have anything on my article page that doesn't already exist on other similar pages. This company has a place in the history of coffee which is why I created a Wiki page for them. They were one of the original roasters of specialty coffee in the USA. I appreciate any help you can give me to keep this a factual and relevant article. You're correct, I work in marketing, but I'm not getting paid by the company to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BayBridge (talk • contribs) 15:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Declined:Giglio Article

I like to thank you for giving me the heads up on where I can get some help in creating an encyclopedic style for my writing. I will try to make the corrections that you recommended and resubmit. May take a little time, but that is the way to go. Thank you for your remarks about my images. Michael LoCascio 18:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glmike523 (talk • contribs) Just an afterthought, the "giglio" is not a religious rite. It is just a tradition and tribute of a group of people to their particular patrol saint. Nevertheless, I will heed your advice. Michael LoCascio 18:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the revision and good tips, Tokyogirl79! Appreciate it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fffranco (talk • contribs) 17:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thank you for your friendly responses to newbies at AfC! Much appreciated. sonia♫ 10:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the reliable sources links. I've contacted Dear Author in hopes of a review so the wiki page can hopefully be saved

Sir aaron sama girl (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Cassadagafilmposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 02:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at Writ Keeper's talk page.
Message added 14:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ReaderofthePack. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 04:35, 7 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mez Breeze

hi, I've left a note on the Mez Breeze talk page. I've just seen the prod tonight. I should be able to improve the article tomorrow (it's late here now & I have an appointment in the morning). I see some RS in http://trove.nla.gov.au/website/result?q=%22mez+breeze%22 search results. and I think I have a couple of books here that talk about her/her work. can you hold off deleting for a day or two so I have time to work on the article? thanks. Kathodonnell (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

great thanks. yes a couple of editors worked on it whilst I was asleep and out. much improved. cheers Kathodonnell (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
it's ok, it all ended ok and the article is much better. we can't all be familiar with all topics. I might add an Australia tag to it so it shows up on the Aus pages if someone tags it again. thanks Kathodonnell (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

John Seymour Sawbridgeworth

I couldn't possibly disagree more strenuously. John's ancestry is the topic. Therefore his ancestors and descendents are obviously also relevant. Although you say that "notability does not transfer backwards" I believe that the story of his ancestry itself, and it's relation to Tudor-period English history, makes his story (him) notable.

The article consists of 4 sections, the final of which is comprised of 2 sub-sections ("jammed"?).

Section 1) 4 lines that introduce the subject and the reason of interest for the article (his ancestry). Maybe if the title were changed to the Ancestry of John Seymour of Sawbridgeworth it would be more clear to you? The final 2 of these 4 lines explains, and leads directly into, section 2

Section 2) This section is an accumulation of historical facts which are referenced to their sources. The reason these facts are included is explained in the last 2 lines of section 1. I've noted your complaint about one of those sources and will trace it back to the root, and change the reference. The final bullet point in section 2 explains why section 4 (which is a major part of your complaint) is relevant. This is not "new" research. I'm merely presenting existing knowledge in a new form as touched upon in the Wikipedia definition of what constitutes new research http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_research#Original_research , and it is all referenced to outside sources. There are currently 72 outside verifiable sources referenced in addition to dozens of links to existing Wikipedia articles.

Section 3) 5 paragraphs of historical background, all of which is pulled from existing Wikipedia articles. This history is relevant because it gives full context to section 2.

Section 4) As noted in the final bullet point of section 2 "There are remarkable parallels in personal characteristics, and lifetime achievements, between members of the British ducal branch of the family, and the American branch descended from John." These parallels are clear when one looks through section 4, again, the majority of which is from existing Wikipedia articles. I'll cross-reference the bullet point in section 2 to section 4 to explain why it exists.

I have no problem taking whatever time is necessary.


This desperately needs to be edited for clarity. There's so much jammed into this page, not all of which is really pertinent to the article. Be aware that even though Seymour might have had notable descendents, that notability does not transfer backwards to Seymour (WP:NOTINHERITED). His notability should be from things that he himself did. There was so much going on here that I wasn't really able to see what Seymour himself was actually notable for. I highly, HIGHLY recommend that before you submit this again for review, you get the assistance of someone from Wikipedia:WikiProject History to help you write this article in an enotability does not transfer backwardsncyclopedic and informative manner. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Also, be aware that speculation and original research is not allowed in an article. There must be verifiable and reliable sources for these claims. It cannot be your own original research. If it is pulled from a source, you need to reference back to the source with a location of where to find it. For example, you reference a will but do not offer any places to find said will or quote the will itself. All the article has to go on is your word and that's not considered a reliable source per WP:RS. I don't mean to sound harsh, but this needs to be worked on. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

  • I'm sorry, but if your intent was to get me to approve the article then your tone is a step in the wrong direction. So far it seems that your only intent was to come on here and insult me. I've given you good feedback and you've chosen to ignore it. That's your decision. You had the option to either ignore it and carry on in the hopes that someone else would approve your article or use it. I might have been brief, but at least I didn't have the bad attitude that you appear to have. Please do not comment on my talk page again. The only recommendations I have for you is that you really need to get the assistance of someone from WikiProject History to help you. As far as my age goes, that's none of your business. My age is irrelevant to the subject at hand. I'm just someone who has been editing for far longer than you have who decided to give you some advice on the article. I could have been like some of the others and just given you a one sentence statement on the article and not even done that. If you want someone else to look at it, I highly recommend User:Chiswick Chap. He's been around for longer than I have and will be even more to the point than I am.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • One other little tip I can give you is that if you think you're in the right, the last thing you should do is go and post long and angry missives on other people's pages. It's not only bad etiquette, it can also be seen as a personal attack. The best thing to do is (as the saying goes) "Keep calm and carry on". Just resubmit the article and let it go. Unless someone makes a point of deliberately going out of their way to continuously decline your submission, it's usually better to just let these things go. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • Dude, let it go. Stop editing to add to your argument. I don't agree with you and I feel that my decision to decline the page was justified. End of discussion. Now if you truly believe that you are in the right, resubmit your article and let someone else make that decision. I have no intention of touching your page, especially since I make a point not to go over the same AfC twice because I think that the more people involved in the accept/deny decision, the better. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


Huh? thanks. I'll just move on — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablocombiano (talk • contribs) 14:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi Tokyogirl79,

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is because after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly: for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 15:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

New attempt to remove OccupyMARINES

Please forgive this unsolicited contact, but I note that a couple of weeks ago, you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia regarding the proposed deletion of their entry on OccupyMARINES. Of 26 respondents, 24 voted to Keep; only 2 voted Delete. The result was to Keep the article.

However, it has now been nominated again for deletion, and I thought you might be interested. Here's the URL for the new discussion page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Occupy_Marines_%282nd_nomination%29

JohnValeron (talk) 04:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 16:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Tap Stevens

Tokyogirl79 I took your advice and removed the "available on Amazon" promo on my bio, I changed "contest" to "winners" in your addition on the Amazon Breakthrough Novel Award, in previous years the award was open to 24 countries but all six winners were American. Pat Stevens Tap Stevens (talk) 20:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Thanks! I could've sworn that it was only for US citizens previously, but guess I was wrong. I think that's why they relabeled it as "international", since so many people assumed it was only for people in the US. LOL, good thing you came along to help edit! I'd have recorded this incorrectly!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Rescue tag placement – When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision

Just a friendly note, when placing the rescue tag template in articles, please place it within the AfD tag. Here's an example, from WP:RESCUETEMPLATE:

<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{AfDM|page=Robin Sage|date=2007 September 11|substed=yes}}

{{Rescue}} (the rescue template goes here, within the AfD template)

<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->

Adding it within the two sets of <!-- --> tags allows the closing admin to automatically remove the tag when closing the AfD. Thanks! Northamerica1000(talk) 21:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thought you deserved this for your work trudging through sources and contributing on the various AfD discussions! --Legis (talk - contribs) 09:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive_1&oldid=1139439022"