User talk:Raznice

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Osho (Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lova Falk talk 12:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Web 2.0. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Sander Säde 07:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please do not post personal information (such as e-mail addresses) in articles, as you did on Web 2.0. Posting the personal information of another person is considered harrassment. Please see Wikipedia:PRIVACY for more information. Thank you. Evil saltine (talk) 07:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Web 2.0, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Web 2.0. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot evade this restriction by re-adding the material while logged out; that is Sockpuppetry, Any re-insertion of the same material will be treated as coming from you.

Also, you must not add your personal opinions. See Wikipedia:Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true", and Wikipedia:No original research. JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the three-revert rule on Web 2.0. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.Andy Dingley (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Web 2.0 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 08:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Semantic Web, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Favonian (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edit to Web 2.0. This was material you had repeatedly added before, and for which you were blocked for 48 hours on 21 August. If you persist in re-adding it, you will be blocked again. Grafen (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New sock at 59.94.147.59 (talk · contribs)

Andy Dingley (talk) 10:20, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]