Jump to content

User talk:Ratnahastin/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

User Warning

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Umm Qirfa, you may be blocked from editing. Exilvm (talk) 10:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salar Jung family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ajanta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Brajesh Singh

Hello! Your submission of Brajesh Singh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Brajesh Singh

On 1 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brajesh Singh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joseph Stalin's daughter Svetlana Alliluyeva fell in love with Brajesh Singh, whom she considered her husband although they were never allowed to marry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brajesh Singh. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brajesh Singh), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

User Warning

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Umm Qirfa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

September 2021

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Brajesh Singh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22

Hello everyone, and welcome to the 22nd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter. This issue will be covering new and updated user scripts from the past seven months (June through December 2021).

Scripts Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

New scripts New scripts

  • Ahecht:
  • Awesome Aasim:
    • Infiniscroll adds infinite scrolling to user contributions, page histories, and log pages.
    • Quick create allows for the fast creation of red-linked pages with two clicks.
  • Caburum:
    • UTCclock adds a clock displaying the current UTC time.
  • Chlod:
  • DaxServer:
    • BooksToSfn adds a portlet link in Visual Editor's source mode editing, in main namespace articles or in the user's Sandbox. When clicked, it converts one {{cite book}} inside a <ref>...</ref> tag block into an {{Sfn}}.
  • FlightTime:
  • Jon Harald Søby:
    • diffedit enables editing directly from viewing a diff "when, for instance, you notice a tiny mistake deep into an article, and don't want to edit the entire article and re-find that one line to fix that tiny mistake".
    • warnOnLargeFile warns you if you're about to open a very large file (width/height >10,000px or file size >100 MB) from a file page.
  • JPxG:
    • PressPass adds a collection of tools for Newspapers.com including configurable automatic citation generation in five different formats.
    • CurrentSwitcher gives you links on the contribs page to hide duplicate entries, current revisions, rollbacks, huggles, twinkles, and redwarns.
    • TrackSum lets you automatically sum the lengths of tracks in templates like {{track listing}} and get total runtimes.
  • Nardog:
    • CopySectLink adds a button to copy the unencoded page title or section path next to each heading.
    • IPAInput allows you to type in IPA symbols by directly looking at an IPA key like Help:IPA/English and clicking on the symbols.
    • TemplatePreviewGuard warns when you try to use "Preview page with this template" with a page that doesn't transclude the template.
  • NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh:
    • ContribsTabVector adds "Contributions" and "Statistics" tabs to user and user talk pages on the Vector skin.
    • CopyvioChecker adds a "CopyvioCheck" tab to all pages, except Special (Vector skin only).
    • LiveDiffLink is a version of Equazcion's LiveDiffLink which shows a wikilink instead of a URL.
    • QuickDiff (by OneTwoThreeFall at Fandom) lets you quickly view any diff link on a wiki, whether on Recent Changes, contribs pages, history pages, the diff view itself, or elsewhere. For more information, view its page on Fandom.
  • Novem Linguae:
    • DetectSNG scans a list of 1,600 SNG keywords and displays them at the top of the article.
    • NotSoFast highlights recently created articles in the new pages feed, to discourage patrolling them too quickly.
    • UserRightsDiff concisely displays what perm was added or removed when viewing Special:UserRights.
    • VoteCounter displays a rough count of keeps and deletes at XFDs, RFCs, etc.
    • WatchlistAFD automatically watchlists the AFDs of any pages you AFC accept or NPP patrol, to help you calibrate your reviewing.
  • P.T.Đ:
  • Qwerfjkl:
    • editRedirect adds a → link after redirects to edit them.
    • RegExTypoFix, a script for fixing typos, is a wrapper for User:Joeytje50/RETF.js.
    • talkback creates links after user talk page links like this: |C|TB (with the first linking to the user's contributions, and the latter giving the option of sending a {{talkback}} notice). It also adds a [copy] link next to section headers.
  • Rublov:
    • diff-link shows "copy" links on history and contributions pages that copy an internal link to the diff (e.g., Special:Diff/1026402230) to your clipboard when clicked.
  • Rummskartoffel:
    • auto-watchlist-expiry automatically watchlists every page you edit for a user-definable duration (you can still pick a different time using the dropdown, though).
    • generate pings generates the wikitext needed to ping all members of a category, up to 50 editors (the limit defined by MediaWiki).
    • share ExpandTemplates url allows for easy sharing of your inputs to Special:ExpandTemplates. It adds a button that, when clicked, copies a shareable URL to your exact invocation of the page, like this. Other editors do not need to have this script installed in order to access the URL generated.
    • show tag names shows the real names of tags next to their display names in places such as page revision histories or the watchlist.
  • Tol:
  • Venkat TL:
    • ColourContrib color-codes the user contributions page so that pages you've edited last are sharply distinguished from pages where another editor was the last to edit the page.
  • Vukky:

All in all, some very neat scripts were written in these last few months. Hoping to see many more in the next issue -- drop us a line on the talk page if you've been writing (or seeing) anything cool and good. Filling in for DannyS712, this has been jp×g. Take care, and merry Christmas! jp×g 07:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Edit Request Tool changes

Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 15:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Ratnahastin! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedies

Educational institutions are specifically exempt from WP:A7, and WP:A1 is only for cases where its impossible to identify what the article is about. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 02:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much, i wasn't aware of them being an exception to WP:A7 and WP:A1. I'll take that into consideration from today onwards. Cheers. Ratnahastin (talk) 02:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
No worries, I just removed another also tagged with G11. That one can be a bit more complicated, but the key is that it applies to pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need a fundamental rewrite to comply with WP:NPOV. But if a substantial portion could be left in place, the page is not eligible for G11. You may just want to review the CSD page for the appropriate criterion before you tag in the future, just to be sure. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Joseph Kearney

The man is a lawyer, so why should his infobox say scientific career? 146.115.59.103 (talk) 04:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

AFDs

Hello, Ratnahastin,

You nominated some articles for AFD deletion discussions today. I just want to remind you to do a proper WP:BEFORE for each article that you nominate which means not just looking at the condition of the article as it exists today but checking to see if reliable sources exist elsewhere. It can be a little embarrassing to nominate articles that are proven by AFD participants to be obviously notable. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay in responding, I'll keep that in mind when creating AfDs. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive sign up

Hello! I noticed that you are signed up for the October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive. However, you're going to be unable to participate if you do not have the New Page Reviewer permission. If you are still interested in participating in the backlog drive, then I encourage you to request the permission at WP:PERM/NPR. I have, for the moment, removed you from the participants list as you not able to participate at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Alright. Although i had requested for the permission on WP:PERM/NPR, it seems there's also a large backlog of requests over there. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Ratnahastin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Ratnahastin. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ratnahastin

Hi Ratnahastin, and hope you are doing well. This is about your oppose vote in the ongoing RfA. I thought I would reach out directly to you in the light of the reasoning you gave. I am confident you have seen that the candidate got Rust (programming language) to GA status, which is significant evidence of their understanding article development and sourcing. I do appreciate your viewpoint of article creation, but editors can easily create hundreds of stubs, without understanding quality creation. More importantly, the key skill of this candidate is their managing the technical foundations of this project, as they are additionally an edit filter manager, a right that extremely very few editors are granted, much lesser than even the number of administrators on Wikipedia. An edit filter manager right is given after confirmation of the very high levels of trust that we place on individuals because they get the power to in reality bring down Wikipedia if they want, as they have the technical knowledge to manage the gates of Wikipedia and to put in action mass technical edits to ensure Wikipedia is safe. Having said that, the candidate getting the admin rights would be really helpful for us to manage the back-end of this project. In this light, I would kindly request you to reconsider your vote. Please note that I do so with all respect and regard for your current reasoning. Much thanks in advance, and most warmly, Lourdes 12:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Ratnahastin:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Discord invite

Hey there. Congrats on being on the backlog drive leaderboard. I really appreciate you helping out at NPP. If you want to hang out with other NPPs, consider joining us on the NPP Discord. Discord is live text chat software that can be really fun. If not no worries. Thanks and see you around :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

October NPP backlog drive - Point award

Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar

This award is given to Ratnahastin for collecting more than 200 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Newfoundland Diagnostics

I disagree with you, most of the sources seem pretty good. NotAGenious (talk) 13:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE BMilinski22 (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi I am wondering why my contribution BayCare Clinic was denied by you. It is fully referenced. Green Bay Press-Gazette is independent and talks in depth about BayCare Clinic. Thank you for any clarification you can provide.

New page reviewer granted

Hi Ratnahastin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless contributions to the New page patrol. Your efforts are immensely valued. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much @Thilsebatti. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Request on 15:05:10, 16 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Sharonmoncy


Assist me as I am creating a new user page for the first time. It would be a great help to me

Sharonmoncy (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Request for assistance on AfC submission

Pease, can you help me to edit my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zula_Global? 2001:B07:646B:5D96:118A:C8F9:AD87:FF85 (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC){{SAFESUBST:Void|

Draft: The OT Love Train

@Ratnahastin Hello. Can you give more details on ‘reliable sources’ for the ot love train’s article? Because the sources used asides from YouTube’s official pages are the top newspapers and journals from Nigeria which they have been referenced. Ghostamg2023 (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Request on 07:35:58, 12 December 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by DIYer2023


Hi! I have tried to find reliable sources but there are no available sources from books etc. about the alliance - I guess because it is still very young. I added all sources I could from the internet and was also able to find sources from the 'Handelsblatt' which is a highly reliable german source. But I am not able to find other sources - what am I supposed to do now? Thank you very much!

DIYer2023 (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Answered at the AfC help desk. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Standard Design Process

Could you please provide more details regarding the decline of a new page for Standard Design Process (SDP). All the sources I have provided are legitimate sources. If you need additional assistance with an expert please do feel free to reach out to me. NuclearDesignEngineer (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Please reach out to me to help resolve my issue. All me sources are reliable, I would like to know what is necessary in order to move forward with the submission. NuclearDesignEngineer (talk) 10:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 23

New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?

Scripts Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

RefRenamer by Nardog is this issue's featured script. For whatever reason, the foundation will only give us better reference names in VisualEditor if we wish for it in the next survey. Nardog to the rescue! This script has a ton of options to satisfy almost anyone who wishes to use better refnames than ":0" and ":418".

Updated scripts Updated scripts

Holy RefRenamer
Screenshot of RefRenamer, a user script that assists in replacing non-descriptive reference names


Scripts++ Newsletter
Scripts++ Newsletter

Improve a script

Pending requests Requested scripts

New scripts New scripts

Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu (talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Topic ban lifted

Hi Ratnahastin. I wanted to let you know I've closed your topic-ban appeal as successful and removed the sanction from the log of restrictions. You are now free to edit caste-related content—just be extra careful to follow policies and guidelines if you decide to do so. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Vsriv90 (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

You rejected an engineering article about one of the most common Seismic norms in the world, written by a seismic engineer with no affiliations to the engineering body which writes the norm?? Really??

The reason you gave was that it doesn't have enough details? There is only reasonable amounts of detail I can provide on Wikipedia, can't copy the whole norm. But the idea that a norm created by one of the world's biggest and oldest engineering societies (and one used to create billions of USD worth of electrical equipment) is not reliable enough unless it is mentioned by other random websites?

You earned the wet trout :P

Wikipedia only reports what the reliable, published sources say. The article you had submitted for review only had a single source, that too from a self published source, which cannot be used here. You might want to resubmit it, when it is reliably sourced and is verifiable. Regards.Ratnahastin (talk) 12:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Hasty dratification

Hi Ratnahastin. Please note that per WP:NPPHOUR, in ordinary circumstances you should wait at least an hour before nominating an article for deletion, blank-and-redirecting it, or moving it to draftspace. Here you draftified an article ten minutes after it was created, whilst the author was actively editing and adding references. Special:NewPagesFeed highlights pages that are less than an hour old with an orange lozange. – Joe (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

I'll keep that in mind from next time, thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Jewels of Africa (talk) 21:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

The Declined Article on Mercy Alu

I am logged into my account. What I am saying is that the "reviewer" stated exacly the decline reason: that the references need to be from verifiable sources independent of the artist/ambassador. It doesn't make sense that ALL the National Newspapers with articles on this Artist are not verifiable? Please we need to be careful to maintain the quality of not only publications but review that we profess. Even a chat response telling me that declining was not far-fetched, without being specific doesn't make sense. The chat comment stated the article is unreferenced and appeared some parts copied from one of the sources, while the reviewer is saying the references need to be from reliable sources independent of the subject; indicating the article is actually referenced? If you believe it "appears" copied, if the same information is carried by different sources about the artist, and you see that I wrote similar about her, should I then make up things about her so as to make my article different? Or shouldn't much of the information online about her be able to be verified as similar? For example, this Major Newspaper of Imo State, Nigeria, that is the flagship Newspaper of the State and writes about Nigerian Artists, including interviewing them etc, with this article about this woman, is considered a passing mention? An unreliable source not separate from her? https://www.imotrumpeta.com/?p=37355

National Nigerian Newspapers who write about Nigerian artists are also unreliable? Is the source you actually mention which is the Intercontinental Music Awards Website where she is noted to be an Ambassador, also an unreliable source that is NOT separate from the subject? I still say the same thing, you are not clear in how you select articles to improve on, and those you completely decline. Even Awards that are verifiable and relevant, backed by Hollywood, and published in these articles with the actual Award links shared, are still not verifiable by your editor? Artist Notability according to you, NEED to include ONLY one thing: Winning a relevant award, representing something significant in that area, Being published in major reliable independent sources. This artist meets all three. You are saying that the Major Nigerian Newspapers are not reliable, since their articles are included. You are saying, that even the United Nations is not reliable, since the link included showing this woman is also a UN/SDG's ambassador with Globcal International, with both the Globcal webpage link, the UN webpage link, and her designated Ambassador page unverifiable? I think something is wrong with your assessment. There are references in all that I have submitted, which verify at least ONE of your listed criteria, even if you choose not to acknowledge the rest. Jewels of Africa

monotypic taxon articles

Hello! I redirected the article Cynotelopus notabilis to its sole monotypic genus Cynotelopus per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. We need not force readers to navigate two or more articles just to learn that a monotypic genus exists and that it has a single species. Please feel free to expand info on C. notabilis (or the genus name itself) at Cynotelopus. Cheers!

I see, thanks for notifying me.Ratnahastin (talk) 02:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Shambuka

A discussion about the lead sentence is on Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Shambuka. Request your inputs. Redtigerxyz Talk 09:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Leaving Random Notices on Wiki Editor's Talk Pages

I see that you like doing copy-paste of random verbiage/notices on Wiki Editor's talk pages, the context which a novice editor may not fully comprehend e.g. 2 recent notices on my Talk page. If there is really a reason you find it necessary to do so, may I request you to contextualize your copy-paste i.e. state the reason why you found it meaningful to leave the specific verbiage on Talk Page. Thank you. Phule lulu (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Shambuka 'Disputed inline' tag

Please do not remove the Template:Disputed_inline tag from Shambuka while the opening sentence is still being discussed in Talk. Please also contribute to the discussion there so that we can reach a stable consensus, we are well passed the point where edit comments are sufficient. Carleas (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

You are reverting many uncontroversial and maintenance edits, please edit the specific text you disagree with, and if that text is subject to an ongoing dispute, please explain why on Talk:Shambuka.
Carleas (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!


– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 103 reviews, for a total of 102 points. – robertsky (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! Ratnahastin (talk) 04:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Ratnahastin. Thank you for your work on Yekutiel Ravayev. Schierbecker, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This could've used another look.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schierbecker}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Schierbecker (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Shambuka

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 08:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Talk Page Spam

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Phule lulu (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Thank you.

January 2024

Information icon Hi Ratnahastin! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Ram Mandir several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Ram Mandir, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Just a heads up. You are reaching WP:3RR threshold soon in a WP:CTOPS article. So kindly proceed accordingly. Thanks.. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ratnahastin/Archive_1&oldid=1201981028"