User talk:Rathorekirpalrathore

Welcome!

Hi Rathorekirpalrathore! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Rathorekirpalrathore. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rathorekirpalrathore. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rathorekirpalrathore|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. Rathorekirpalrathore (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. Rathorekirpalrathore (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stiven Mikhail (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no change since previous submission and likely undisclosed paid editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stiven Mikhail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rathorekirpalrathore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Lalmohanlal per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ildivino1010. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For unblock of my Wikipedia account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rathorekirpalrathore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never do anything against Wikipedia's privacy policies.

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked for violating Wikipedia's privacy policies. Yamla (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rathorekirpalrathore (talk) 12:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your unblock template for you, but you were evading your block just a few weeks ago as Gairathimonikagairathi; I think it very unlikely that anyone is going to unblock you when you under these circumstances. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

I don't charge for editing.I didn't read Wikipedia's privacy policies properly, so I made some mistakes.From now on I will not violate any kind of Wikipedia's privacy and policy.So please give me permission to edit.And please unblock me from editing. Rathorekirpalrathore (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock my Wikipedia account

Hello sir,

I have read all the privacy policies of Wikipedia properly. From now on I will not do any editing that violates the privacy policies of Wikipedia, so please unblock my account.

t. Rathorekirpalrathore (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]