User talk:Shashankamath

Adipurush

The film fails as per WP:NFF so deleting the draft publish for review. SP013 (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ratanpur, West Bengal has been accepted

Ratanpur, West Bengal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 09:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ratanpurwb (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adipurush(film) (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SS49 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Adipurush, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adipurush(film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adipurush(film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~SS49~ {talk} 09:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ratanpurwb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~SS49~ {talk} 09:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Adipurush(film)

Draft:Adipurush(film), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adipurush(film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Adipurush(film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, PURBA BARDHAMAN (BIDHAN SHABHA)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, PURBA BARDHAMAN (BIDHAN SHABHA). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Purba Bardhaman district. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Purba Bardhaman district. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Poydoo can talk and edit 17:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You need to stop making edits like these:[1][2] As it says in WP:OVERLINKING,

Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked:

Everyday words understood by most readers in context (e.g., education, violence, aircraft, river)
Common occupations (e.g., accountant, politician, actor)
The names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar. This generally includes major examples of:
- countries (e.g., Japan/Japanese, Brazil/Brazilian)
- geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America)
- locations (e.g., Berlin; New York City, or just New York if the city context is already clear; London, if the context rules out London, Ontario; Southeast Asia)
- languages (e.g., English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish)
- nationalities and ethnicities (e.g., English, British, Chinese, Turkish, African-American, Hispanic)
- religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism)
Common units of measurement, e.g. units relating to time, temperature, length, area, or volume. If both non-metric and metric equivalents are provided, as in 5 centimetres (2.0 in), usually neither unit needs to be linked, because almost all readers will understand at least one of the units.
Dates

Anyone reading the Nroff page will know what the word system means, and anyone reading the Balgona page will know what the word village means.

You don't need to turn every other word into a link. -Guy Macon (talk) 03:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prosenjit Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banagram, Purba Bardhaman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Banagram, Purba Bardhaman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 04:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bara Belun

Hello, Ratanpurwb,

Thank you for creating Bara Belun.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The existing sources haven't mentioned the subject's name anywhere. Please provide only such reliable sources that indicates the subject's name. Thank you and happy editing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheBirdsShedTears}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Narayanpur (Purba Bardhaman), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have made over 50 successive edits to the article Narayanpur (Purba Bardhaman), the cumulative effect of which is to change absolutely nothing: see the diff[3]. Please stop making pointless edits. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Digital Health Mission

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on National Digital Health Mission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Bruce1ee^talk 10:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your edit to National Digital Health Mission has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. I have removed the copyrighted material for now. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Digital Health Mission moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, National Digital Health Mission, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Digital Health Mission

Hello Ratanpurwb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged National Digital Health Mission for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Digital Health Mission moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, National Digital Health Mission, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cherami Leigh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not add pages to non-existent categories: see WP:REDNOT.
See also WP:SUBCAT. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Ratanpurwb, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Ratanpurwb (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is confusing, Ratanpurwb, as a) you are not an admin and can't award permissions and b) you don't have this right. This is not an honest message. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ratanpurwb, listen carefully. Do not touch the Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled page. You've made your request and it's been declined. Do not remove that entry manually; that will be archived by a bot. You do not qualify for this and I doubt that you even understand what this is for. Your recent edits to that page have been disruptive. Leave it alone. Focus on other things. Schwede 66 23:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Td

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Td, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Anarchyte (talk • work) 13:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Shashanka Chandra Das 23:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Shashanka Chandra Das 23:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Shashankamath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Disruptive editing

Blocking administrator: ‪Voice of Clam‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Obvious sock of User:Shashanka Chandra. Now blocked directly. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 10:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{SPI case status}}

Concern regarding Draft:Banagram, Purba Bardhaman

Hello, Shashankamath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Banagram, Purba Bardhaman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Banagram, Purba Bardhaman

Hello, Shashankamath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Banagram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

". Salkuni" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect . Salkuni. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#. Salkuni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:38, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]