User talk:Raphael1234567

December 2020

Hello Raphael1234567. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Raphael1234567. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Raphael1234567|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blablubbs|talk 22:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raphael1234567! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Signa Holding that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 15:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raphael1234567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I'm being blocked. I already stated at talk that I do not write or edit for any financial compensation. My articles and edits are well researched and referenced. A good part of my contributions are translations from the German wikipedia where there is a through relevance check. My articles have been moved to the draft section despite being reviewed by the AfC team (Dominik Thor) or being found relevant by the biography team and German wikipedia (Dominik Duscher). I kindly ask to unblock this account, review the draft status of my contributions and move them back to mainspace.Raphael1234567 (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The images are too professional looking for me to believe that you are doing this for free. 331dot (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How did you come to edit about the topics you edited about? Your very first edit had proper formatting; have you edited Wikipedia before? 331dot (talk) 08:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please explain how File:Dominik Duscher.png and File:Dominik Thor.jpg are your own work. MER-C 10:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote one contribution in German wikipedia (Dominik Duscher) and used a copied framework form another Austrian surgeon's wikipage to guide my article creation. I used the same framework for my englisch contributions. The pictures where taken at a beauty press day in Vienna by myself, I can send you the uncropped originals. I think my contributions are relevant, unbiased and well referenced. I also don't think they are written in an advertising tone. If you disagree let the community edit them in mainspace. Raphael1234567 (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dominik Thor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dominik Thor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dominik Duscher

Hello, Raphael1234567. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dominik Duscher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]