User talk:Rajuiu

Welcome Rajuiu!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,301,866 registered editors!

Hello, Rajuiu. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 05:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Rajuiu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rajuiu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Rt Rana (Announcer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rt Rana (Announcer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Pages marked as "wiki" user-generated, so they are not reliable sources and can not be used. Primary documents from the government can't be used in biographies (WP:BLPPRIMARY). Blogs (including Blogspot.com) are also not usable on biographies (WP:BLPSPS). – Thjarkur (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rt Rana (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are unreliable, and there are a few Wikipedia mirror sources left.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rt Rana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rt Rana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 19:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Beddington has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Beddington. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Richard Beddington has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Richard Beddington. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rt Rana has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rt Rana. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 17:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shama Mohamed (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please go through our relevant guidelines in WP:N and WP:NPOL to understand who qualifies for an article. You are also requested to tone down the Linkedin profile type writing to have a better chance of this passing through AfC

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shama Mohamed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shama Mohamed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 02:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rt Rana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rt Rana, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RT Rana. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 14:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello Rajuiu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Rt Rana, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rajuiu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rajuiu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing from my talk page, can you please disclose whether or not you have ever received money for editing Wikipedia or have been in the employ of someone who directed you to edit Wikipedia as part of your employee duties? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear Rosguill i didn't receive any money and who did not directed me to edit Wikipedia as part of employee duties .i proud to be a wikipedian .if i have free time i will do editing, and i wont receive money for any Wikipedia editing in future because i think Wikipedia is a power ful web page , as well as i dont like non notable person article creation and also here in the future Rajuiu (talk) 10:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear Rosguill i didn't receive any money for Rt Rana article ,but this is my first article as well as iam good radio listener and iam fan of rt rana so i interested that article as well as iam doing creation radio related articles such as contributing ks raja and list of radio presenters its my own work , in future i will do , thanking you Rajuiu (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear Rosguill i like your question and i can truely say i won't create inappropriate article , only notable article only i will create in future.Rajuiu (talk) 12:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear Rosguill you are an admin you knows all , i think don't need explain about rt rana article but i kindly request could you restore rt rana article , he is serving srilankan and indian government notable programs thanks. Rajuiu (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not willing to restore the article. It had both neutrality and notability issues, and from reviewing your editing history I have concerns that you're not being entirely honest with your answers. Could you explain how you got started editing Wikipedia? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear Rosguill iam honesty with you all time and in future and first i started editing wiki commons and normally iam reading celebrates Wikipedia but some celebrates wiki peida is going afd so i read afd all .then i interest i want to be a good wikipeian so that i started eaditing wikipeia Rajuiu (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't really understand what you were trying to say here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of radio presenters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brendan Jones. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rt Rana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rt Rana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rt Rana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—S Marshall T/C 10:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear S Marshall thanks could you restore Rt Rana article talk page ? thanks Rajuiu (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajuiu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajuiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i could not believe this , and while i was editing , was very happy because i am proud be Wikipedian but now i feel sad because i have been blocked , dear Mz7 i kindly inform you that i don't have time so that if i have free time i will edit so you can check my contribution no need to create more account and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rajuiu/Archive this Sockpuppet_investigations while i was seeing someone cheating all Wikipedian because Paviraj5623 this user whilE Rt Rana AFD Was going time he asked question to me but i didn't answer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rt_Rana ) because i knew very well he is creating Sockpuppet and as well as his voting comments is very different and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2021_March_12 while this review time i learned if rt rana article creating user can get Sockpuppet investigations because rt rana's against team creating Suspected Sockpuppet for rt rana article create user and they also paid for Suspected Sockpuppet dear Mz7 if you take any decision i will accept because i loving Wikipedia and also accept Wikipedia policy thanking you Rajuiu (talk) 14:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Please read WP:GAB and stick to the problems with your own editing; other people's actions are not relevant to your block. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Richard Beddington (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No lede.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Richard Beddington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Richard Beddington, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 00:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]