Jump to content

User talk:Rajibarber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Rajibarber, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for reaching out! What do you mean by "safe" on Wikipedia? You can check out Help:Introduction for a tutorial for new editors to help you learn the policies and guidelines here. In general, it's good to pay attention to not disclosing more personal information than you want to disclose, because most activity on Wikipedia is completely public, but I don't know of other safety concerns really. Dreamyshade (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, dear Dreamyshade
By Safe, Imean without being kicked out of the platform and You have really responded to that.
I should still getback to you on any concerns in the furure.
Regards Rajibarber (talk) 14:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rajibarber! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Rajibarber. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rajibarber. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rajibarber|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Dear @DoubleGrazing,
I feel honored having you as my reviewer, and thanks for the good job done.
Truth be told, I am expected to receive a compensation for this particular edit/creation, that's not my major motivating factor for its creation though. On this, I should follow your directive to include: {{paid|user=Rajibarber|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} in the specified template, and on my user page.
It is about stating the character as a fact of history in her local environment such that the younger generations could know that it is possible to rise through diligent hard-work and consistency and not through just by "any means" that is devised on a daily basis.
Forward, I sincerely wanted to take time and learn all the ropes of what works on Wikipedia till my last breathe. Being a trained cultural historian myself, I know there are a lot to learn on this platform, and maybe much more to give back.
Aside the guidelines you gave above Dear erudite, what best ways do you think I can have a safe stay on Wikipedia without running foul of the guidelines
Regards. Rajibarber (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are appreciated Dear @Theroadislong
I would check that ASAP.
Regards. Rajibarber (talk) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have checked that, Dear @Theroadislong.
It is well noted, I shall make amends.
Any other? Rajibarber (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sofiyulah per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sofiyulah. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The WordsmithTalk to me 19:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]