User talk:Rajeev Kathpalia

Welcome

Hello, Rajeev Kathpalia, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Autobiography warning

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at User:Rajeev Kathpalia (Official Account)/sandbox. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rajeev Kathpalia (Official Account)/sandbox

I see you putting a lot of work intro trying to develop this draft. With all respect, the links that you provide in the draft are all useless, with the exception of one. The YouTube links are potentially problematic; see WP:YOUTUBE. The link to megamodelhunt makes no mention of Rajeev Kathpalia. This link goes to a login page of some kind, and again doesn't mention Rajeev Kathpalia. With this link, it says the content is unavailable. The only link here that is usable is The Telegraph. But, this is very insufficient to support an article about Rajeev Kathpalia. Please carefully review WP:NACTOR and Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline. What you have here so far does not come close to those standards.

Also, have you seen the warning above? You appear to be writing about yourself. This is strongly discouraged. Please respond. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you respond please? --Hammersoft (talk) 16:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft: If you take a look at this user's edit history, it becomes clear that it is also a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. It is very difficult to say whether this user will contribute in some other field/article. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. There's no deadline, but placing a {{db-blanked}} might be in order for Draft:Rajiv Kathpalia. I wish the editor would communicate with us. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft: I've reported this username, as "Official" usernames usually suggest shared usage, and if this person is notable somehow it may also need to be blocked until their identity is confirmed. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajiv Kathpalia (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You must footnote your sources. See WP:REFB for how to code footnotes. Please fix and click Resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajiv Kathpalia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rajeev Kathpalia (Official Account), I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Rajeev Kathpalia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajeev Kathpalia, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all i am facing a problem please help me , I created Article of Rajeev Kathpalia Official Account

I'm not sure what problem you are having, but the very first thing you need to do is change your username. Usernames that contain "Official" are often used by a representative of the named person, and not the named person themselves. If you yourself are Rajeev Kathpalia, you should change your name to remove the "Official Account". If you are not Rajeev Kathpalia, you need change your name to remove their name. You can request a username change by filling out the form here. 331dot (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After you do that, you should review the policy on autobiographies before further edits. While not forbidden, it is highly discouraged for users to write articles about themselves. If you are a representative, you should review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 12:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot (talk) i requested my username changing form and is not yet aprroved.

It will take time for the request to be fulfilled. In the meantime you may wish to review some of the policies I have linked to above. 331dot (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

and also why this page pop up

- This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. It may need editing to conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. There may be relevant discussion on the talk page. (March 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message).

That has been placed on the page because given your username, it seems to be an autobiography, and it needs review by an uninvolved editor for neutrality and other issues before it can be removed. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is a autobiography page (Rajeev Kathapalia,Bollywood Actor). So can you please reviewed it. i am new in the wikipedia.

Have you read the policy on autobiographies to learn why it is an issue for people to write about themselves? Imagine Narendra Modi or Barack Obama writing their own articles. 331dot (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeev Kathpalia, I am glad you are finally communicating with us. As I've stated previously, there is not enough to go on here to create an article. The _only_ source you have provided (and the only one my own searches have come up with) that is acceptable is this one. The other sources are either unreliable youtube and facebook pages, or pages that do not mention Rajeev Kathpalia. The article refers to "M.S. Dhoni: The Untold Story" as an upcoming movie...but was released last year. The article claims Rajeev Kathpalia played a character called "Mihir" in the same movie, yet no source that I can find indicates there was any such character in the movie. Even if there was, it was so minor as to escape mention in any sources. There is simply almost nothing to go on here. I've pointed you previously to WP:NACTOR. Please tell us you have something more to support the notability of Rajeev Kathpalia. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajeev Kathpalia for deletion

This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article Rajeev Kathpalia is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeev Kathpalia until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! GSS (talk|c|em) 16:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rajeev Kathpalia

A tag has been placed on User:Rajeev Kathpalia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rajeev Kathpalia. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajeev Kathpalia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rajeev Kathpalia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Shonell Thakker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]