User talk:Rajannamysore

Rajannamysore, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rajannamysore! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shilipi Sharma (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Shilipi Sharma (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody deleted the article. Please help.

July 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Other people with the same name

A tag has been placed on Template:Other people with the same name requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aakramana (2014) flim.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aakramana (2014) flim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of B Ajaneesh Loknath

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B Ajaneesh Loknath, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GAB (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hemanth Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upendra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Mysore Mallige Scandal

Hello Rajannamysore. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mysore Mallige Scandal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: WP:CSD#G10 is only for pages that "disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose". This is not such a page. If you think it should be deleted, consider AfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 08:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your dedicated contributions to Draft:Huccha Venkat. You did really good to improve that. Your efforts to improve the encyclopedia are highly appreciated :) Ya sh ! 03:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert changes made 'filmography' of Yash

Hi Rajannamysore! My reverting was in no means to devalue your work. But, this a Wikipedia page and the filmography of an actor should only show his contribution in the film, such as his character name, roles other than acting and awards won, if any, for his performance in the corresponding film. For instance, see this — Suriya, Aamir Khan, Al Pacino. It does not go with an actor's popularity. Why not add info on the body of the article and cite sources, instead of resorting to adding superfluous info on the tabulated filmography? Thank you! Editor5454 (talk) 06:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TfD

Hi. Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rajannamysore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Rajkumar (actor). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Porki Huccha Venkat

The article Porki Huccha Venkat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 11:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rajannamysore. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shiva Rajkumar

Template:Shiva Rajkumar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 13:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rajannamysore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Dee 03 05:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP removing well referenced and neutral statements, just because it hurts your "VOKKALIGA" sentiments. Rajannamysore (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can find my reply on my talk page. Also, avoid posting the same thing in two places. Dee 03 16:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can find my reply on your talk page. Also, avoid posting the same thing in two places. Rajannamysore (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What same thing did I post in two places? Dee 03 04:58, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Freedom of Press

During Kumaraswamy second tenure as Chief Minister of Karnataka. Post debacle of Lok sabha polls in 2019 results of Mandya constituency, where his son Nikhil Kumaraswamy lost to independent candidate Sumalatha Ambarish. Nikhil was reported to have been involved in drunken tantrum in Kannada daily Vishwavani News by popular investigative journalist Vishweshwar Bhat.^[1]^[2] Kumaraswamy ordered police action on Vishweshwar Bhat for reporting the story.^[3] This was widely criticized as 'Attack on Freedom on Press'.^[2]^[3]^[4]^[1]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dee 03 05:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Vokkaliga. - Arjayay (talk) 19:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Vokkaliga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How can this be my ONLY warning, when you have said the same twice? Just curious.Rajannamysore (talk) 19:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

July 2019

Your recent editing history at Vokkaliga shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rockstonetalk to me! 21:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks:But the phrase "The word Gowda literally means head of territory, They are identified as landlords and village headmen. They are known to be a dominant and powerful caste in South Karnataka" is derogatory, inflammatory to rest of the community in the region. What is claimed is false, not referenced, unsubstantiated. Vokkaligas are less than 9% of the population in the state of Karnataka. There are listed in Backward Class in census. "Dominant and powerful caste" is reckless statement.

Edit warring is wrong, even if you're right. -- Rockstonetalk to me! 21:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Rockstonetalk to me! 21:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am I supposed to do something about? may be worried? cry? or something else? Please enlighten me in this world of maaya. Rajannamysore (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well you risk being temporarily blocked.... your best bet would be to make a comment here explaining your side of the story. -- Rockstonetalk to me! 21:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Vokkaliga. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going waste my valuable anymore in Wikipedia. This is a mess! People making themselves feel powerful by empowering with this virtual democracy. Remember, there is a real world outside where you touch and feel the air, perhaps drink a coffee. MINDLESS PEOPLE. Rajannamysore (talk) 22:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Ab207. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Prashanth Neel have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Swathanthra Palya

The article Swathanthra Palya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film appears to fail WP:NFF as nothing was found in a BEFORE to meets the notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PravinGanechari (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[bhat4-1] "Vishvawani Editor Vishweshwar Bhat Stands By His Article Alleging 'Nikhil Gowda's Rampage Against Grandfather Deve Gowda Post-Mandya Loss' After FIR Filed Against Him For Criminal Defamation". Republic TV.

[bhat1-2] "FIR against newspaper editor for article on Nikhil Kumaraswamy's alleged drunken tantrum". The News Minute.

[bhat2-3] "Case Against Karnataka Journalist For Report On HD Kumaraswamy's Son". NDTV.

[bhat3-4] "FIR Against Karnataka Editor For Report On CM Kumaraswamy's Family". outlookindia.com.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]