User talk:Rahim231

Contentious topics - infoboxes

You have recently made edits related to discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. This is a standard message to inform you that discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kathleen's bike (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@Kathleen's bike have been editing infoboxes from quite a time,

i added Pakistan to the indonesian side in the infobox since Pakistani leader ship did not only diplomatically support indonesia they also sent troops to fight in various battles even before partition and after partition Pakistan again sent troops. The Pakistani leader Muhammad ali Jinnah in the last days of August he ordered detention of the Dutch planes at Karachi airport. The planes, full of weapons, were on their way to Jakarta as part of the Dutch reinforcement arsenal to augment aggression against the Indonesian Republic.

As a recognition of the assistance from Pakistani Muslim soldiers, Indonesia presented Independence War Awards to the volunteer fighters and the highest honour of Adipura to Muhammad Ali Jinnah posthumously during the Indonesian Golden Jubilee celebration of 17 August 1995

sources:-

• "1516979439_156.pdf" (PDF). na.gov.pk. 2024-06-12. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-01-24. Retrieved 2024-06-12.
• Sarwar, Zafar Alam (3 September 2019). "Quaid backed Indonesian fight for freedom". www.thenews.com.pk. The News International. Archived from the original on 2024-06-10. Retrieved 23 May 2021.::*"The Forgotten Contribution Of Pakistan To Indonesian Independence". WowShack. 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
• "INDONESIAN CONSULATE GENERAL IN KARACHI". Archived from the original on 2011-07-26. Retrieved 2010-12-27.
• Source: "thejakartapost.com">"Pakistan aims for better relations with Indonesia beyond politics". Archived from the original on 2011-07-17. Retrieved 2010-12-27. Rahim231 (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

There is no mention of Pakistan in the main body of the article at Indonesian National Revolution, see guidance at MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE and also the request for comment at Template talk:Infobox military conflict#RfC on "supported by" being used with the belligerent parameter. Kathleen's bike (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

In this case if wikipedia is changing the use of infobox just to mention beligerents, so the supporters or foreign involvement would be placed in a seperate section with a heading in the article?

I dont see here at the indonesian war of independence, so should i just create a section.... Rahim231 (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Rawalakot Rebellion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rawalakot Rebellion. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 1947 Poonch rebellion. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 1947 Poonch rebellion. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

@Kautilya3 I would like to explain you, that you might've have mistaken the article for duplication of Poonch rebellion due to the name of the article, However it isnt. The Article might be named wrongly but the sources indicate's about the battle and small actions which occured. you can read it from page 9-12 in the source i used. The source also directly states that:-

"The next night, Captain Hussain Khan collected 200 Home Guards and notables at Miral Gala (Rawalakot), and declared war against the Dogra ruler. He administered an oath to the Mujahideen to fight for accession to the dominion of Pakistan at all costs."

now if we see it in this sense Captain hussian revolted or rebelled right ? and then led them into a battle (Battle of Rawalakot against the state troops.

source:-

[1] Rahim231 (talk) 14:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Rahim231. Thank you for your work on Battle of Rawalakot. Another editor, GreenLipstickLesbian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I had to remove a lot of article because it was a blatant copyright infringement. I see you've already been warned multiple times not to add copyrighted text to Wikipedia. Please let this be the last time. I've also added some maintenance tags. If you'd like me to move this article back to the draft space so you can rewrite the sections I had to take out, please let me know.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GreenLipstickLesbian}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

@GreenLipstickLesbian sorry, I know i copied directly the content directly but the speedy deletion got me tense and i acted quickly, to make it clear it isnt the duplication of an old article. Rahim231 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Rahim231! Thank you for being so honest about what happened. Deletion is a pretty scary process! Just so you know, copying and pasting outside content directly is much more likely to result in the new article's deletion than pretty much anything, but I understand why you acted the way you did! In the future, you can always work on drafts in your userspace, the draftspace, or your sandbox. You still have to follow Wikipedia's rules there (such as no copying and pasting content from ouside sources, no BLP violations), but those drafts won't be deleted without 6 months of inactivity, and it gives you a chance to make sure it's as good as can be before you move it to the mainspace. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Rawalakot assessment

I am not sure whether Hawkeye7 finished this assessment. In any event, I think the lede (introduction) is too short. Please summarize the main points of the battle in a paragraph or two in the beginning. Usually, a very short introduction is viewed as inconsistent with the complete content guideline, which is in the text about B class but is not specifically set out in the five requirements. Also, the last two sentences of the last paragraph in the aftermath section need a citation. One will be enough if both points are covered in it, as I am sure you know. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

@Donner60 Yep i was also wondering about it so i waited for the reply.

I Expanded and summarized the Prose by copying Important events from below, also added the citation in Aftermath. Thanks Rahim231 (talk) 10:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Thorgo has been accepted

Battle of Thorgo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks alot for reviewing the article which i made ! Rahim231 (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Action at Tsari has been accepted

Action at Tsari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 12:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Action at Tsari

Hi Rahim: I need to review this article before I can confirm the bot assessment and contest entry end date assessment mainly because of the template at the top. However, coordinators review bot assessments monthly (or sooner if necessary) in any case. I think that this is likely a minor matter and the article can be reassessed as B, if it needs to be temporarily kept at a lower level. That may require the contest entry to be split between August and September. I have been short of time in part because of numerous requests for B class review. I will get to this as soon as I can. If the template is due to minor sentence structure issues, I will change it. If it appears to be something else, I will let you know what I think needs to be added or changed. In the meantime, I have marked the contest entry as pending review. Sorry for the delay. Donner60 (talk) 01:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

no worries take your time. I'm eager to fix the issue i did edit it but still unsure if its fixed, Thanks. Rahim231 (talk) 08:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

As far as I am concerned, if there was an issue, it has been fixed. I have no concerns with grammar, sentence structure or missing references. This was a complex situation because of the multiple parties involved and those changing sides. There were failures of communication for various reasons leading to uncertainties and complicating actions. I don't see a problem with this, especially if one takes the time to reading it slowly as I think is necessary. No objection or further comments have been made in response to your further edits. I am confirming your contest entry and will remove the maintenance tag. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rahim231: I have deleted the cleanup maintenace tag. I was shown the following messages: Script warning: One or more {{cite book}}: Empty citation (help) templates have maintenance messages; messages may be hidden (help). Script warning: One or more {{citation}}: Empty citation (help) templates have maintenance messages; messages may be hidden (help). There are links in the messages but I can't find any errors or any further help. You can see these messages with the links by clicking on the edit tab, do not enter any change in the article or put anything on the edit summary line, then click show preview and the messages will appear. Please look into this. I suggest you review your references to see if any are not properly formatted. Since the problems do not show up in the article as viewed on the page, and the links have not helped me discover which of these might be a problem, I am at a loss to explain this further. In any event, it does not lead me to change the assessment or to reinsert the template at the top of the page. I think it is worthwhile to look at it in case a later question is raised about whether it has been investigated. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I looked into the problem described by you but i couldn't find any messages of error. I have reviewed my References also which seem to be fine, it might be some glitch. Thanks Rahim231 (talk) 11:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Great work

Assalamu Alaikum, I wanted to say your work is very good; keep up the great work! Also, can you please try to fix my articles if they have any issues, mainly Battle of Chumb (1965). Thanks Pilot From Pakistan (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi "Pilot From Pakistan",

it seems that you have joined Wikipedia recently and made this article. However the article has many problems mainly blatantly violates the Wikipedia policy of copy right as you can see for yourself by clicking on this link the copy right detector tool has given me the percentage of not only just 50 % but above than 90 %!! which means you are committing copyright infringement,

https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Battle+of+Chumb+%281965%29&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0

For now i would suggest you to immediately reword the whole page in accordance to encyclopedic tone of Wikipedia policy. Also cite further sources for conformation and add an aftermath section thanks. Rahim231 (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Thorgo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Thorgo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Thorgo

The article Battle of Thorgo you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Thorgo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 23:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Chunj has been accepted

Battle of Chunj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

48JCL 17:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Chunj

Hi there Rahim, I edited the battlebox on the Battle of Chunj using some research that I did prior, if anything looks wrong, or you need a battlebox made, feel free to contact me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret.Sayyid (talk • contribs) 09:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

the note in the commander section was a good addition thx. Rahim231 (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Thorgo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Chunj commanders

Salaam again, I wrote an article for Major Alan Macfarlane Sloan and I linked it to the Battle of Chunj article, let me know if you want anything else changed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret.Sayyid (talk • contribs) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Wa alaykumu s-salam I didn't know there could be a page for Major sloan, Nice work Rahim231 (talk) 07:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)