User talk:Raheelejaz907

July 2021

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that in this edit to Inter-Services Public Relations, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jp×g 07:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:General karamat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:General karamat.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:General janjua.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:General janjua.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Qamar Javed Bajwa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm M.Ashraf333. An edit that you recently made to Chief of Army Staff (Pakistan) seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! M.Ashraf333 (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sahir Shamshad Mirza, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. He promoted on General rank on 24th November. And assumed office of CJSC on 27th. both dates are correct and placed fine in infobox and Date of promotion section. So don't change it again. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 08:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gen Asim Munir.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gen Asim Munir.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm SahafatKaLover18. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Asim Munir (general) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Munir (general). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.SahafatKaLover18 (talk) 09:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Asim Munir (general). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SilkTork (talk) 10:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you and SahafatKaLover18 for 24 hours for edit warring on Asim Munir (general). You both fell foul of WP:3RR today, though I note you have been engaged in a slow edit war prior to today. Any issues you have must be sorted out on the talkpage not by edit warring on the article. SilkTork (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SilkTork (talk) 12:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for one week for creating an alternative account (User:Raheeiejaz907), and using that account to edit the same pages as your main account, which is against policy - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. The alternative account has been blocked indefinitely, and this, your main account, has been blocked for one week. If you are caught socking again, you may be blocked indefinitely. SilkTork (talk) 12:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Raheelejaz907/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raheelejaz907! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Raheelejaz907/sandbox

Hello, Raheelejaz907. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Raheelejaz907/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Asim Munir, you may be blocked from editing. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SilkTork: The user is back, and there's no issue with that. However, they're removing sourced material from a BLP (Asim Munir), which isn't allowed without prior discussion on the tp. I thought I'd let you know because you blocked them earlier for the same reason on the same BLP. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Saqib, noted. Let me know if they engage in edit warring, or if another user starts to make similar edits on that article. SilkTork (talk) 10:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Raheelejaz907, Please refrain from removing well-sourced material and inserting WP:OR content using clearly unreliable sources onto a BLP. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib the sources are valid and I appreciate your concern for the authenticity but every aspect has two sides, so let that sink in. Raheelejaz907 (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This source politicalprism.net isn't reliable in the slightest. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not ? Raheelejaz907 (talk) 18:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, as you did at Asim Munir.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SilkTork (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing on Asim Munir due to a history of disruptive editing - the most recent episode being to remove three high quality sources, replacing them with a dubious political blog. Until you can show understanding of why this (along with edit warring and socking) is unacceptable, you will be restricted from editing that article. You will find some advice and information at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Meanwhile, you are free to edit other parts of Wikipedia, though if you engage in further disruptive editing you may be blocked completely from editing. SilkTork (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raheeiejaz907. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 19:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]