User talk:Rachel Helps (BYU)/Archive 3

A year ago ...
influential personalities
	... you were recipient; no. 1350 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

Editathon

So, are a lot of people showing up to the editathon? Provided the football game doesn't interfere too much, I should be there about 5:45. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nihonjoe: Not a ton of people--my 2 students, plus a third with editing experience, my librarian friend who edits in her free time, and three other people so far (so... 7?). We got pretty good press coverage, but that doesn't always translate into more attendees. I am expecting at least four or five more people this evening though! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inviting me. It was a fun event, and I think you should have more in the future. It might be good to make a list with the names of people/topics and then a number of sources for each so editors have a few to draw from instead of just the one bookmark. Since the focus is on editing rather than researching, this may help more articles to be improved. Again, thanks. It was fun to come and participate. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome @Nihonjoe:; thank you for coming! Oh shoot, did I forget to tell you about our to-do list? It's really easy for me to get sidetracked to the research part. I'd love to do another edit-a-thon in the future; this time I was going for accessibility and hoping to draw in lots of people, but it might make more sense to just plan for smaller numbers and focus on collaboration on few pages. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if you hold them regularly, people will begin learning about them and the group may grow after time. Focusing on a few articles for each may work better, too (as you said). ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 15:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This might be useful in the future. Are you planning to do another one during the science fiction and fantasy symposium (or perhaps the week afterward)? It's February 16-18. If it's the week afterward, you could advertise at the symposium. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure you see this one, too, since I made two edits to your talk page.

···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I asked LTUE a few months ago when you suggested it, and they said that they already had their schedule for the year, but might be interested for 2018. I hadn't thought about doing an edit-a-thon the week afterwards, and unfortunately it's too late for me to get an event open to the public approved for in the library for February. Hmmm.

I've also noticed that edit-a-thon participants rarely become regular editors. The "information literacy" part of it is significant though! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps doing 2-4 events throughout the year (maybe quarterly) working with the symposium to work on speculative fiction related articles (could be local speculative fiction people or other local speculative fiction topics)? That might be more interesting to them as it would give them a way to work more with the community and improve resources about the community. Maybe have it be a contest, and have the winner of the contest awarded annually at the symposium? I'm sure we could come up with something cool for an award. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I like this idea! If we can connect it to BYU somehow, I can more easily help through my job. Maybe I can see if the Leading Edge would want to be involved? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine. We could also involve the UVU magazine, Warp & Weave, and maybe try to involve professors at both BYU and UVU. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good idea. Leading Edge might be interested--I need to work out the details. Contest-wise, I was thinking that it could be for creating or improving articles for SF/Fantasy authors (ideally ones with ties to Utah). I'll need to make the criteria very specific. Should I limit the (still hypothetical) contest to just author pages, or would it be better to include notable works? Sometimes authors themselves aren't notable enough for a page, but one of their books is. What criteria would you suggest for a Wikipedia SF/F writing contest? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found the contests page on metawiki, so I'm reading through that, and I'm still interested in your opinions. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think limiting it to sf/f topics connected to Utah somehow (like improving I Am Not a Serial Killer and I Am Not a Serial Killer (film), both connected to Utah through the author, Dan Wells) would give a sufficiently-broad base on which to draw. It would include authors, works, films, and so on. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leading Edge would like to do the contest before the end of the semester (probably this March). I'm drafting some of the rules over at my sandbox; feel free to make edits or suggestions there. Would you be interested in helping with the judging? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can do that. Just let me know when and what the rules are. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've drafted some rules here; do you have advice on it? I have some concerns that I'm not sure what to do about:

I made categories a specific scoring criteria because I read a study that found that belonging to categories was the best predictor of a page not being deleted.
I have a "passes GA review" point category--worst-case scenario is that author GA nominations get flooded and it takes a while to review them. I like including GA though, because it already has clear criteria and a pipeline for communicating pass/fail. I'm not sure what I'd do with pages that I'd normally put on hold though.
3 points for 1,000 bytes is completely arbitrary, and might end up being a big pain to calculate. I'd need to advise participants to not delete and add text in the same edit. But I want to encourage improving existing pages. Hmmm...Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be good to make sure the contest submissions are (at a minimum) long enough to be eligible for DYK, meaning at least 1500 characters of prose (based on the DYKcheck tool). It's really not that hard to write an article that long. I added a link to a copyvio detector, too. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good thinking, I don't really want to judge new pages that are shorter than 1500 characters. I moved the rules over to a more official-looking GLAM sub-page and tried to tighten them up a bit. For GA reviews we put on hold, we can award an amount of points that seems fair. Leading Edge wants to open the contest to all SF/Fantasy authors, not just Utah-related ones, but I'm afraid the scope might get overwhelming in that case--what do you think? For page expansions, I wrote that it had to be expanded at least 2x, but I haven't thought of a good way to encourage expansion beyond that. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be good, especially for your purposes, to have at least one of the drives/contests each year be focused on only Utah topics. I don't have a problem with other ones being opened up to any sf/f/h/ah topic, though we may want to coordinate with WP:SCIFI, WP:FANTASY, and WP:HORROR to get a wide variety of input on how it should run and get more people involved. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who are the judges for the contest? They should probably be listed on the page somewhere. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I found the list. Should I add myself to it? ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd been meaning to ask you if you'd like to help with the judging. Please add yourself as a judge if you're willing. If you find any of the judging criteria unclear, let me know. I was torn on the collaboration thing. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 00:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kiyo Tanaka

A few links for this person:

[1]
[2]

···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tsune Ishida Nachie

Japanese name: 名知恵常 (Nachie Tsune)

Ishida is likely 石田, though there are a few other ways of writing it. Could also be 石多 or 伊志田 as well.

Possible articles:

[3]
[4] (about her niece, Ei)

Also, on a related note, this page may prove useful for Japanese LDS info. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I'm taking her off our to-do list for now, since I'm not sure if we have enough sources to establish notability (I'll see how some of our other pages go for now). Here are the sources I collected on her: #6 on Deseret News list, Women of Faith Vol. 3 pg. 122

Iris Robinson Creer and Mary Goble Pay

A friend suggested these women as possibilities for articles. The first was on the YW general board from 1963-1970. The second I'm not sure about. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 15:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Mere Mete Whaanga

Hi Rachel, I came across this nomination while building prep sets for DYK. I would like to know how this and other biographies that are totally sourced to LDS sources, including Deseret News, meet WP:BIO? Have you other experience with biographies in which notability was confirmed even though the sources are not independent of each other? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Yoninah:, For Mere Mete Whaanga, she's mentioned in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography, which I thought was independent enough to establish notability. I have been trying through my students to make a few more pages for Mormon women POC, but unfortunately it might be too soon for some of them. Mere Mete's mentions on the New Zealand Biography site are sparse, although I did find a few articles about her, not her husband, in the Salt Lake Tribune, which I'll have my student add today. If the consensus is to delete the page, we can transfer some of the information about her and her husband to her husband's page. Which other pages were you concerned about? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just this page, after seeing numerous other Mormon biographies. The Dictionary of New Zealand Biography is certainly good. Thanks for keeping on top of the need for good sourcing. Yoninah (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: There was one page, Elizabeth Ann Whitney, which also didn't have very many non-LDS sources on it. It was nominated for deletion, but I think her membership in the Relief Society presidency helped her case? I also found a few mentions of her in the Salt Lake Tribune. Thank you for all your work on the DYK nominations--I know you've frequently helped to improve our pages. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that your writer is using Newspapers.com sources. Do you have a free one-year subscription at WP:Newspapers.com? Then you can make a clipping and reference it via open access. See what I did for one of your references. (I did this to add her link to the page List of people buried in the Salt Lake City Cemetery, so this page wouldn't be an orphan.) More links to other Wikipedia pages should be added to this article. Best, Yoninah (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yoninah We have access to Newspapers.com through BYU; I had no idea about the clippings feature, that's very convenient! I'll tell both my student workers to use it from now on. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on this DYK nomination. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that was pretty nifty of you to approve the nomination! Regarding the "firsts", there has been a bit of discussion among the DYK regulars, but you would need to get WP:CONSENSUS before making a change at Supplementary Guidelines. Yoninah (talk) 18:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hyrum M. Smith have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please do not add the promotional tag on your external links edits - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mlpearc, I believe that links to archival materials are welcome on Wikipedia. There are guidelines for adding collections to external links sections on The Wikipedia Library guidelines for cultural professionals. It doesn't say that a link must be formatted in a certain way. Why do you define wikilinking where the collection comes from as overly promotional? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://findingaid.lib.byu.edu/viewItem/MSS%20SC%20247/ links to information that pertains to the article, any further information about where this information is located would be and is promotional. - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But if that link ever breaks, wouldn't it be useful to know what institution it came from to prevent wp:linkrot? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad for some reason I was thinking these were external links. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Account creator granted

After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]] if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 16:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has been added for your specific event and is subject to removal after. Good luck! — xaosflux ^Talk 16:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Equus

Thank you for your edits and support for this article, and I'm sorry some of the blame for this got directed your way. I don't think I will ever be nominating or reviewing another DYK again. Ribbet32 (talk) 06:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ribbet32: Please don't let a difficult situation one time deter you from future nominations. I've been on the site for 10-11 years, and I still run into them on occasion. If you ever need any sort of help, please let me know and I'll be happy to help you out. Rachel can vouch for me. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ribbet32: It is kind of a pain to do DYK nominations, but it's a great way to get more visibility for your work, and sometimes it can be fun too. I'm sorry your first nomination got pulled from the main page--it wasn't your fault at all, and maybe I was being too picky on the wording. Hopefully I can be more specific in my future reviews. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rachel and Nihonjoe, but it wasn't my first DYK, nor just one difficult situation. The last time I did a review, it wasn't even for QPQ, I did it freely, it was abusive. For all this "We encourage the community to participate" theme in the Rambling Man Arb case, the atmosphere at DYK is completely toxic. Ribbet32 (talk) 18:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ribbet32: I guess I've generally had a different experience then. I'm sorry you have had poor experiences there. If you want to bring something to DYK, but don't want to directly participate there, you can let either myself or Rachel know when an article is ready for DYK, and we can nominate it for you and take care of the process. You would still be named as having worked on the article, but won't have to directly participate. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Merian C. Cooper

On 8 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Merian C. Cooper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Merian C. Cooper, director of King Kong, destroyed nearly all 5,000 copies of his autobiography Things Men Die For? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Merian C. Cooper. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Merian C. Cooper), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lucinda Lee Dalton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lucinda Lee Dalton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lucinda Lee Dalton

The article Lucinda Lee Dalton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lucinda Lee Dalton for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lucinda Lee Dalton

The article Lucinda Lee Dalton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lucinda Lee Dalton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Karl G. Maeser

On 17 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karl G. Maeser, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Karl G. Maeser tutored Brigham Young's 56 children, he went on to help found Brigham Young University? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karl G. Maeser. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karl G. Maeser), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid question regarding authorship of Book of Mormon books

Over at wikisource I've been doing some work on some of the PD content we have there related to Mormonism. One of the questions which comes to mind to me, based on my own comparative ignorance of the topic, is which if any of the figures in the various works should be counted as "authors" of the individual works for inclusion in pages such as wikisource:Author:Mormon, and, I suppose, what sort of additional phrasing might be required in some cases. I'm guessing you know more about this than I do? John Carter (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:John Carter Hmmm. I admit I'm not particularly familiar with how wikisource deals with the authorship of religious texts. There's a list of the books in the Book of Mormon at Outline of the Book of Mormon, which links to pages for each book. On the pages, it usually states who the author is according to the Book of Mormon. I usually look to Biblical examples to model things after, so for example, wikisource:Author:Moses clarifies that the works are "attributed" to Moses. The Book of Mormon gets a bit trickier in its latter half (the "large plates") because as you've probably noticed, the books are abridged by Mormon, but the original authors are rarely noted. Listing Mormon as the abridger seems like a good-enough fix. I can see if there's any current Mormon scholarship on the topic if you like (I don't know off the top of my head). Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, the way they deal with it is whether the individual is counted as being the "author" of the book in question. I'm guessing that would include being either the "original" author or the person who revised or edited the versions available to us. And yeah, you're right, I'm thinking the "large plates" are the biggest part of the problem. I checked against our articles here on them, and in at least a few I didn't find any sort of clear indication as to who might have written them. John Carter (talk) 22:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jett Atwood

Since you're working on LDS-comics stuff at the moment, could you take a quick look at Talk:Jett Atwood, see if you think the changes I suggested there are appropriate, and if so, implement them? I've got a COI on this stuff. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sandra Tayler

On 4 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sandra Tayler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sandra Tayler wrote Hold on to Your Horses to help her daughter "visualize and control her impulsive ideas"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sandra Tayler. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sandra Tayler), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 13:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1232 views on that day isn't too bad.

···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yes, especially considering that I think we're back to the 12-hour cycle for DYKs. I'm happy to get more visibility for new Wikipedia pages :-). Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dendō

On 9 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dendō, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that drawing the graphic novel diary Dendō helped Brittany Long Olsen cope with "raw and emotional" moments on her LDS mission in Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dendō. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dendō), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a person, but feel free to check out my DYK

Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Castle Project. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nice! the only thing I know of that is remotely related is that there's an electrical substation in Provo canyon named after Vasco Tanner, because he put in some effort into getting it built. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Portrayal of Mormons in comics

On 26 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Portrayal of Mormons in comics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the portrayal of Mormons in comics (example pictured) in the 1900s imagined women fighting in the Utah War in large dresses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Portrayal of Mormons in comics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Portrayal of Mormons in comics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Roger P. Minert

On 6 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roger P. Minert, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to research by Roger P. Minert, local church records in the United States are more likely than naturalization records to have information about a German immigrant's birthplace? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roger P. Minert. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Roger P. Minert), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Hi, I want to congratulate you for your recent DYK contributions. I saw Roger P. Minert and thought it was a very interesting hook. Thanks and keep doing what you're doing! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 19:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Belle S. Spafford

On 8 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Belle S. Spafford, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that LDS Relief Society president Belle S. Spafford directed the Singing Mothers at the 1964 World's Fair? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Belle S. Spafford. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New list that may interest you

List of notable people from Provo, Utah. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Would anyone from Category:People from Provo, Utah belong on the list? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. Feel free to add people as you can. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedian in Residence BoF at Wikimania 2017

Hello!

My name is David Alves (User:Horadrim~usurped), and I'm an Wikipedian in Residence at RIDC NeuroMat (User:Horadrim). I've reach your contact through the Wikimedian in residence page in Outreach. As you may know, Wikimania 2017 is coming! I am here because, as a fellow WiR, I believe this would be a great opportunity for us to share experiences, discuss difficulties and exchange solutions, creating a community among us capable of supporting in other projects that would benefit from residents. In that sense, I have submitted a proposal of a Birds of a Feather activity to Wikimania that you can check out here. I hope to count with your support in this project and would like to invite you to join us if you participate in Wikimania. In case of any doubts, please feel free to contact me, either in my talk pages or by e-mail at david.alvesoutlook.com.

Thank you very much! ‎Horadrim~usurped (talk) 00:33, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Desideria Quintanar de Yáñez has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Desideria Quintanar de Yáñez. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Max Steiner filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Douglas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leonard J. Arrington

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leonard J. Arrington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Desideria Quintanar de Yáñez has been accepted

Desideria Quintanar de Yáñez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Devopam (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Desideria Quintanar de Yáñez

Hello! Your submission of Desideria Quintanar de Yáñez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 06:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]