Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Castle Project
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 03:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Blue Castle Project
[edit]- ... that the Blue Castle Project is a proposed nuclear power plant that will increase Utah's electrical generation capacity by 50 percent?
- Reviewed: Léocadia
Created by Nihonjoe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC).
- Length, Date, and QPQ all check out. The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output. Best, Mifter (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Mifter:
That is a direct quote, which is what is used in the article in the first paragraph in the Initial project section: "increase Utah's electrical capacity by approximately 50 percent". Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'm not seeing the concern here. The word "output" is not used in the article at all as far as I can tell.···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Mifter:
@Mifter: Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. Pppery 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- - The copyvio check was performed and cleared with the review (in the future I will note it explicitly) and the hook length is also fine. Also, for future reference, while text does make it difficult to convey and interpret emotion, saying something along the lines "not some minutia to gloss over like you did" is very easy to interpret as being condescending (though I assume it was not your intent to come across as such). Concerning the ref, I have modified the hook to mention capacity as the ref documents. Best, Mifter (talk) 22:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Mifter: Ah, you meant in the hook. Okay, I can see that. Thanks for catching that. Any other concerns, or are we good to go? ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nope, all set, the hook is approved and should be promoted and run in a few days. Mifter (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Alright, sounds good. Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nope, all set, the hook is approved and should be promoted and run in a few days. Mifter (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Mifter: Ah, you meant in the hook. Okay, I can see that. Thanks for catching that. Any other concerns, or are we good to go? ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
