User talk:RUSSIANEMPIREwwone

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RUSSIANEMPIREwwone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 01:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Russia and Demographics of Russia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Crimea has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Crimea was changed by RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884266 on 2018-07-25T23:09:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Russia, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for numbers vandalism (adding fake numbers; see page history and user's contributions) - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi RUSSIANEMPIREwwone! You created a thread called Countries at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm NewEnglandYankee. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Russia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't change a sourced number unless you are prepared to provide a better source for the revision. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 00:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been previously warned, and now, when you decided to pus your nationalistic POV, time for blocks has come.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Russia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. General Ization ^Talk 04:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your email: You may not instruct other editors here not to edit an article. Please see WP:OWN. General Ization ^Talk 04:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, i understand what i've done and i am greatly sorry for this. I am willing to change if i get unblocked and i promise to never again vanalize the coomunity guidlines or pages ever again. Can i please be unblocked because i will do better editing and promise never to disrupt any page from now till the end of time. I wanted to try and get back to what i was doing before this conflict, please, will you unblock me?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to do better editing and make things right for me, my pages and the administrators of the Wikipedia website RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the autoblock template - you're directly blocked for extensive disruption of Russia and Crimea-related topics. You'll need to show an understanding of why you were blocked and you'll need to explain how you'll change your editing if you are unblocked. Acroterion (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for disrupting a page and violating information on it. I completely understand the reason for getting blocked, i understand my mistake and i vow to do better. I shall make more constructive and informative contributions to the Wikipedia community. I shall never again commit any further damage to pages and violate them with false information. I have read the guide on this and fully understand why i was blocked. I am now asking flor forgiveness from the wise administrators of Wikipedia and promise to do better. Thank you RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, not enough to say, "I understand what I did wrong and won't do it again." What is it you won't do again? What will you do instead?. You also changed information about Zoroastrianism ‎ w/o sourcing or discussion. I think a topic ban on Crimea and Russia is in order. Please describe what constructive edits you'd make. Also, speaking for myself, the "wise admin/forgiveness" bit is not helping your cause. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I intend to edit other pages such as the Zoroastrian Population by Country or give an update on my talk page about my recent activity. I also agree to never interfere with the Russia/Crimea topic and or pages again. I will become a better contributor to this community. I will not break anymore pages and ruin info about that page's topic.

I've removed the autoblock template again, as Acroterion did above. You are directly blocked for disruption, and not affected by the autoblocker. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When could i be unblocked? It's been a week and i already said that i understand what i did, i'll never do it again. Please believe me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, i've been meaning to ask, how long will i be blocked for. I understand what i did wrong and plan to do better in the future. I am asking for forgiveness from the administrators of the Wikipedia community. I believe that this block is no longer necessary because i learned my lesson, i want to contribute to Wikipedia and this has become a nuisance to me. I already stated that i have changed my ways and promise to make a greater Wikipedia and support those who run it. So please, i beg you, can i be unblocked? I will prove to you that i will never again cause any further harm to pages and info. It was a big mistake that i made and a am regretting it. Please, will you unblock me? RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (talk) 02:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are now sockpuppeting per my block on Emperor of Lords (talk · contribs) -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have restored the declined unblock requests - you may not remove them per WP:BLANKING. If you do this again you may risk losing access to edit this page. SQL ^{Query me!} 04:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look, i'm trying to be nice but no one wants to help. This whole blocking issue is very annoying and i'm trying to compromise with the administrators. For the last time, i have learned my lesson and plan to do better. But no one believes me and i am willing to agree on terms just please remove this block. It's not necessary anymore for me to be blocked. I am looking for help on this and no one wants to accept the unblock. Can someone help me out? RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You just got caught creating a sock puppet. Your best option now is the standard offer: prove that you can go six months without sock puppetry, and we will review your case then. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"I am sorry. I was wrong. It's not a question of, did I do something that you believed was wrong. It's a question of, did I do wrong. Yes, I did wrong. I should not have edited those articles to say those things. I have strong political opinions, but I should not have let them affect what I did to the articles. I have had it explained to me that, for politically sensitive topics, sentences can be the result of long careful discussions on talk pages, which are supposed to be acceptable to all sides. I should not have thrown myself in and tried to replace a neutral statement with a statement supporting my own political beliefs. I am sorry, and if I am unblocked, I will not do it again - either on this article, or on any other article that is about Russia's borders today or during WW One or at any time between that. Again, I was wrong. I am sorry." RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (talk) 21:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Allow me to show you what "removing TPA" means. You have exhausted the community's patience; you may no longer edit this page. Yunshui ^雲 _水 22:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Four declined unblock requests plus a CU-confirmed sock, so may I suggest removing TPA? - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (talk • contribs) 22:15, 11 January 2019 ((UTC)

The comment above was not for your benefit. Loosely translated, it means, "Enough is enough." General Ization ^Talk 22:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see the line that says, If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired?" That means you are approaching the point where someone removes your ability to edit this page. In any event, I do not see any unblock request being honored before 6 months from today.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see I was wrong. You have passed that point. In 6 months you may appeal this block via the WP:UTRS.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion since I've already declined once before.

I was really considering unblocking until I saw you created a sockpuppet to evade your block. (I surmise User talk:Emperor of Lords was autoblocked and checkusered.) You may not attempt to appeal this block for 6 months from today. Each time you edit or sock, the clock will reset. I am disinclined to make the standard offer but someone might feel differently. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying a prewritten unblock request

I was sadly not present when it happened, but please don't do that next time. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23749 was submitted on Jan 12, 2019 00:11:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

RUSSIANEMPIREwwone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24058 was submitted on Feb 25, 2019 02:24:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Country data Iraqi Kudistan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Country data Iraqi Kudistan, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheImaCow (talk) 13:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]