User talk:RIPKrt

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ellen Degeneres. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -Kasreyn 09:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to John Lennon, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Kasreyn 10:00, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism Sept. 1 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Desertsky85451 01:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 7 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to R. J. Helton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ee60640 00:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball Heaven Sports Complex

A tag has been placed on Baseball Heaven Sports Complex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Baseball Heaven Sports Complex is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Baseball Heaven Sports Complex. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Leuko 16:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Mary Edwards article is a direct copyright violation from her website. You may write about the subject in your own words, but please don't repost the site's content. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 19:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Feces, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 21:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Jericho High School page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 04:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the List of songs featuring a theremin page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Bobbi Jo Lathan

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Bobbi Jo Lathan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.132.19.76 18:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Long Island Astros

The article Long Island Astros has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 02:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Tonya Reiman

Hello, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. In accordance with the suggestion of AfD policies that the good-faith creator of an article be notified when that article is nominated for deletion, I wish to let you know that I have nominated Tonya Reiman for deletion given her apparent lack of notability. You can comment on this nomination here for the next few days. --Tjss (Talk) 15:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to see about re-creating it, now that she's seemingly everywhere.[1][2][3] DMCer ™ 11:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 23, 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the DJ Jazzy Jeff page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Enok^talk 05:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at alcoholism. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DGG (talk) 00:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Ilene Johnson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Susan Ilene Johnson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tassedethe (talk) 16:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bayless Conley

A tag has been placed on Bayless Conley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Yavoh 18:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally I just nominated this article for deletion given it's untouched state, unreferenced nature, BLP status, lack of notability and apparent copyvio. Nefariousski (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Gwen Shepherd

I have nominated Gwen Shepherd, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwen Shepherd. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Whpq (talk) 12:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bill Bowers

A tag has been placed on Bill Bowers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 04:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Walch

A tag has been placed on John Walch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 04:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RIPKrt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 13 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Ted Sod - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Eric Morris (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tammy Hensrud - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tammy Hensrud - Copyright violation

This article was a blatant copyright violation - pasted in from here with no credit whatsoever to the source and full of promotional language. I have reduced this to a stub to remove the copyvio and credited the source. Please read Talk:Tammy Hensrud for further information and please check the other articles you have created or significantly expanded to ensure that they do not have the same problem. Voceditenore (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Central New York Maple Festival

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Central New York Maple Festival, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.maplefest.org.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trish Harnetiaux

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trish Harnetiaux, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://trishharnetiaux.com/bio.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trish Harnetiaux

The article Trish Harnetiaux has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Minima © (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ted Sod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Sod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Sod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Perez (actor)

The article Miguel Perez (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced WP:BLP. A look at IMDb makes it clear that this one does not pass WP:NACTOR as this actor's roles are all guest roles not notable parts in TV or movies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Central New York Maple Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central New York Maple Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central New York Maple Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Just Chilling (talk) 20:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kari Coleman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kari Coleman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kari Coleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sgerbic (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vicki Hirsch

The article Vicki Hirsch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Morehead

The article Elizabeth Morehead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actress

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]