Jump to content

User talk:R0paire-wiki/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi R0paire-wiki! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 16:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, R0paire-wiki. Thank you for your work on 1974 Donegal County Council election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1979 local elections

[edit]

It's really good to see the new pages you've created recently for council elections. I might build on these myself in the coming weeks, as I'm planning to review and touch up all articles on Irish local elections ahead of the June 2024 elections. A small note thing to note on sources. The IrelandElection.com website is a great resource, and I use it myself frequently. However, it does fall under the category of a self-published source, as opposed to a reliable published source. For older 20th century elections, it might be the best comprehensive data we have, so we should use it in building out those pages (supplemented where possible with newspaper reports, and any academic coverage). But with the 1979 election, I think we use should the officially published results in the first instance. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 08:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to R0paire-wiki for collecting more than 25 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosses Community School (March 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, R0paire-wiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Irish People (party), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neutrality. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Offensive Weapon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molly O’Reilly has been accepted

[edit]
Molly O’Reilly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 03:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seán Garland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat McCartan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, R0paire-wiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosses Community School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: September 2024

[edit]

What are you talking about? How am I being "disruptive"?! Elva Reichel (talk) 10:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In all the undo edit spam, you reverted a couple of spelling corrections back to incorrect ones. Those weren't necessary reverts, and fit being disruptive if you aren't properly checking what you are reverting. R0paire-wiki (talk) 10:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for reporting that vandal! I think it's the same vandal as yesterday. I also replied by adding that they also vandalized the 1953 West German federal election and the fact that they change IPs. The vandal may be a communist as they keep mentioning the "bourgeois state". Hlsci (talk) 08:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I think so too. ARV will probably stop them for now, but if they keep changing IPs it probably won’t be for long. R0paire-wiki (talk) 08:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The best course of action would be to protect the pages the vandal is especially interested in. Hlsci (talk) 08:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that’s likely the best course of action R0paire-wiki (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeseburger

[edit]
Hlsci (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are getting very close to 3RR here. "Everybody loves Raymond" is POV. I've reverted POV. Cease and desist. Sarah777 (talk) 20:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kieran Patrick Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin McCaughey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galbally.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
Thank you for helping fight the 1949 West German federal election vandal yesterday! Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 05:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Please bring the Western Chalukya Empire page to stable version without any casteist claims as vandalized by anonymous users 1.22.220.98 (talk) 09:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restroing

[edit]

Hi, I have restored the Pallava dynasty page to a stable version which was vandaised by anonymous users, who tried to push their caste in the page Karnandus (talk) 10:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improper Reversals

[edit]

Hello,

While I see no indication of it being in bad faith, you have twice reversed my edits without just cause. In the first place, the fact of a marriage between Abelard and d'Argentfuil renders "wife" more proper than "lover." As to the other issue, I did, in fact, provide two sources. One was from a Rabbi and professor. The other from a well-respected Calvinist ministry. Both agree with the "dedication" view as opposed to a sacrifice. Both are proper in this circumstance. Why does this article describe the latter as the main opinion? I can find a reference in a source that it is supposedly the majority view in history, but it doesn't actually list any commentators and the author himself disagrees with the notion. Lastly, you reversed even the minor style changes I made (adding first names to make it uniform). Why did you do this? You appear to be using some sort of program. Was it unintentional? Shouldn't you check each item individually rather than erase everything? Thank you,


TanRabbitry (talk) 18:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second source you cited is not WP:RS and the first source requires attribution (e.g; "X in an article for Y stated...") alongside citing the source. The article for Héloïse states it was a "love affair" with a cited source to support it, so I'm more inclined to support that then an uncited wife edit.
The sacrifice mention also has an existing citation for it. I would create a discussion on the talk page regarding that change as it may be disputed due to the existing source.
Yes the reverts were done with a tool, and yes they were intentional for the aforementioned reasons. R0paire-wiki (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cease and desist defaming me please

[edit]

Dear Roparire-wiki

You keep writing on the Wikipedia page about me that I was "found" to have lied and that I said "pedophile rings" were operating in the Northern Territory. Neither of these things are true and there is no evidence to support these claims. They are false and defamatory and this misinformation has on numerous occasions caused harm to me - including threats of violence based on hatred of mye by individuals who I do not know and who have read this misinformation. I was alleged to have lied by the former NT Chief Minister who was later forced to resign as a result of her misinformation and lack of action in relation to child abuse and neglect. The NT Treasurer made the same allegations. They were not "findings". The funding from the Independent Complaints Panel about the evidence that I gave on the ABC Lateline program was that I was a credible witness. There have never been finding that I lied. There have only be allegations. The findings were that I told the truth along with th other witnesses. Similarly, I have never used the term pedophile rings to describe what was happening. A Minister did. But not me. This is again, false and defamatory. Please cease and desist immediate. Respectfully, Gregory Andrews GregoryWAndrews (talk) 23:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits to the article have reliable sources support them, so there really isn't a valid reason for removal unless you have reliable sources stating the contrary.

You have yet to actually provide any reliable sources that absolve you of what is detailed in the article. The coroners report only makes a single general remark about your work which is far too broad to be construed as "his evidence wasn't false"; and the links to your website both fail WP:RS and don't actually support what you claim with them, and weirdly aren't available directly from the organisations that they are purported to come from.

You may not like what the article states, but it is neither false or defamatory if it is supported by reliable sources.

You have also been notified several times across a number of accounts and IPs that your WP:COI means you should not edit the article about you for the sake of neutrality. You can suggest edits via the talk page, but your edits thus far should inability to follow WP:NPOV.

If you are dead-set on 'rectifying' what you consider "false", I would suggest getting these news and media sources to publish their findings absolving you themselves or via wayback machine. R0paire-wiki (talk) 00:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Independent panel's findings reference me as a credible witness and make no allegations or findings that I lied. I have given you this already. If you don't cease and desist I will pursue this through legal channels. Here is the link once more:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080806111511/https:/www.abc.net.au/corp/pubs/documents/feb_23_08_mutitjulu_final_report.pdf GregoryWAndrews (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is the type of sources I was referring to being WP:RS - however that particular source makes no reference to what you claim it does.
Also legal threats are prohibited on Wikipedia, see WP:LEGAL. R0paire-wiki (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sloan - Please make a change to my bio?

[edit]

Hello-this is Michael Sloan. Could you please make a change to my biography? The last sentence should read: “Michael is a member of PEN America, the Lute Society of America, and the Society of Illustrators.“ I would like to remove the part that mentions that I was a member of a Pulitzer prize jury since it turns out that that information should be confidential and not released to the public. Thank you! 38.126.98.218 (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed it, though do note that it was sourced from their website (you can find the links to the website pages in article history) so you may want to contact them about that also. Very welcome. R0paire-wiki (talk) 16:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Abrams

[edit]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/29/stacey-abramss-rhetorical-twist-being-an-election-denier/ Stacey Abrams source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freespeech2024 (talkcontribs) 03:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite that source and write about it in the section you are editing the name of. The change looks uncited otherwise. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert not justified

[edit]

Revert my edit on Kliment Red'ko back. "WP:MOS for historical names" is not a justifiable cause here. Kyiv citizen (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

J10 page

[edit]

Hi there,

I have replied to your message on the J-10 page due to your revert of my edit.

Please check and assist.

Thanks. 2A00:23C5:CDA5:EC01:CCE7:4A4:5BB5:E6CB (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That user...

[edit]

...you just warned a few times--don't. Report immediately. Don't hit rollback, don't warn on their talk page. I just deleted that talk page, because that user name should never ever appear anywhere, and now I am going to revdelete YOUR edit summaries, which contain their user names. Just report and leave it to the admins, OK? Their name is bad enough for an instant block. Drmies (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand, thanks for the feedback. In future I'll report to AIV and/or UAA without reverting. R0paire-wiki (talk) 23:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Yes I just saw your report--thanks. This is just another LTA, and they typically get a kick out of reverting, cause then they can revert you, and there's more to clean up. I think I got it all--edits and edit summaries and user names. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome R0paire-wiki! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]