User talk:Quaenuncabibis/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Quaenuncabibis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Herzog (neuroscientist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Herzog (neuroscientist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I've accepted this draft; now at Michael Herzog (neuroscientist). Espresso Addict (talk) 02:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Espresso Addict for the approval! And thanks Robert McClenon for your note! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 08:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin has been accepted

Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Tagishsimon for the quick review! Happy new year! Kind regards, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolaana Khovalyg (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kohlrabi Pickle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are unfortunately no independent sources that discuss the subject in any detail per WP:GNG, and I don't see any indication that WP:PROF is met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dolaana Khovalyg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dolaana Khovalyg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 14:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Kohlrabi Pickle I updated a few links. Shall I resubmit it or just leave it as it is for potential later submission? Thanks! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 15:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi there - I was new to evaluating academics at AfC when I reviewed this article. You might want to try submitting it again, and perhaps a more experienced editor can help. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 01:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Quaenuncabibis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 14:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marinella Mazzanti has been accepted

Marinella Mazzanti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Majed Chergui has been accepted

Majed Chergui, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Category suggestion

Hi there, I've noticed at articles like Draft:Damir Filipovic and others you're using some generic ones like Category:Scientists or Category:Mathematicians - these are generally to be avoided as they aren't for individuals, but are just container categories for more specific ones. More specific ones like Category:Swiss scientists or Category:Swiss mathematicians are much better, and/or even more specific ones if appropriate. Thanks. :) Also I'd personally avoid using ORCID as an external link, as it's better when integreated with authority control. Keep up the good editing though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Kj cheetham for the useful comments. I shall adopt the categories accordingly. Have nice day! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roland Tormey has been accepted

Roland Tormey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

warmly, ezlev. talk 18:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks ezlev. for the swift review! Much appreciated! All the best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Mikhail Lebedev

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuorscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 01:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Martin Kolinski has been accepted

John Martin Kolinski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the swift review of the article, dear Theroadislong! This road had a shortcut. ;-) Cheers, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Olaf Blanke

Hello, Quaenuncabibis. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Olaf Blanke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 01:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rolf Gruetter has been accepted

Rolf Gruetter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 15:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Ase1este for the review! Much appreciated! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I like how the stylization of the signature name is copied literally. 🙂 Anyway, thank you. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 16:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Fail and fail better. I tried hard, dear Aseleste! ;-) Cheers, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carlotta Guiducci

Hello, Quaenuncabibis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carlotta Guiducci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

ORCID

Hi there. Generally, you might be better off putting scientists ORCID number as part of the Authority Control tag rather than including an external link to their ORCID profile. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Kj cheetham! Thanks! I now changed it accordingly in the submitted drafts. Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 09:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luisa Lambertini has been accepted

Luisa Lambertini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 01:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear gobonobo, many thanks for the review! Much appreciated! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sylvie Roke has been accepted

Sylvie Roke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

User:GKFX^talk 13:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift review, dear GKFX! Much appreciated! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 06:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Didier Guzzoni has been accepted

Didier Guzzoni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

versacespace talk to me 02:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review, dear versacespace. Great! Cheers, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damir Filipovic has been accepted

Damir Filipovic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah ^💬 13:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Noah for the review! Much appreciated. Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 15:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niels Quack (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources are not reliable and do not demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niels Quack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Niels Quack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 23:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the update, Noah. I will rework the draft. Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaétan de Rassenfosse has been accepted

Gaétan de Rassenfosse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, dear Paradise Chronicle! Much appreciated! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhu Jieping has been accepted

Zhu Jieping, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Theroadislong for the review! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niels Quack has been accepted

Niels Quack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks dear DGG for the review! Best regards, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Auke Ijspeert has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Auke Ijspeert. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment, dear Theroadislong. I have now added more secondary sources to prove his notability. I hope that helps! Kind regards, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 16:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auke Ijspeert has been accepted

Auke Ijspeert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, dear Theroadislong! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mirko Bischofberger (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As he is not a professor and as a WP:BLP, the article needs excellent WP:SECONDARY. There is nothing there in the first 10 references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mirko Bischofberger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mirko Bischofberger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 11:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Magistretti has been accepted

Pierre Magistretti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Sivula has been accepted

Kevin Sivula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimitri Van De Ville has been accepted

Dimitri Van De Ville, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Lehning has been accepted

Michael Lehning, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luc Thévenaz has been accepted

Luc Thévenaz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean-Louis Scartezzini has been accepted

Jean-Louis Scartezzini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Hi @Quaenuncabibis: How goes it. I notice that your using Infobox Academic. It might be better to use Infobox Scientist. The layout of the properties for education and fields are better purposed for European scientists. For a European scientist, the education property would contain the University and the Fields property would contain the actual fields he worked in, e.g. Physics, Fibre Optics. The alma mater field is only specific to North American universities and I think Japan, although I'm not sure. It would be ideal if you could go back and fix it. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 11:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, dearscope_creep for above comments and all the reviews! I will use the scientist's infobox in the future for new articles. Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 12:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincent Kaufmann has been accepted

Vincent Kaufmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 12:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michel Bierlaire has been accepted

Michel Bierlaire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 12:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerardo Turcatti has been accepted

Gerardo Turcatti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 12:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc Gruber (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

There is no doubt that the person is notable, easily passing WP:NPROF with 19 papers with more than 100 citations. However, many of the references are primary, i.e. WP:PRIMARY, many of them are profiles and micro listing, and there are very WP:SECONDARY sources. As an author, can you add in a book review, and if possible, some secondary sources. Please give me a shout when your finished and I will promote it. It doesn't need a lot. Two or three decent references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marc Gruber and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marc Gruber, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 11:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Quaenuncabibis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creep^Talk 11:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello scope_creep, I searched for some more secondary references and included them. Unfortunately there are not many. Please advise. Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giuseppe Carleo (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Certain notable passing WP:NPROF with more than 6 papers with 100 citations or more, even as an Assistant Professor. However, as BLP is serious lacking in WP:SECONDARY sources. Please add WP:THREE secondary sources and give me a shout and I will promote to mainspace. The part that needs to references, is his personal life section. His academic life is ok-ish.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giuseppe Carleo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Giuseppe Carleo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 11:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear scope_creep, thanks again for the review. I have now added a few more references to the article. I hope they meet your expectation. Else please advise. Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)