User talk:Quaenuncabibis

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Your draft article, Draft:Matthias Gäumann

Hello, Quaenuncabibis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matthias Gäumann".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Christophe Moser

Hello, Quaenuncabibis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christophe Moser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthias Finger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthias Finger, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthias Finger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Henchoz has been accepted

Nicolas Henchoz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Superboilles for the review. For some reasons the article was moved back to the draft space. What might be the reason? Can you try to move it again to the main space? Thanks indeed, ~~~ Quaenuncabibis (talk) 13:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, apparently some dick move by another editor. To be honest I found the entry very much borderline so won't get more involved than that, sorry. Try to get him some visibility one way or another (Forum des 100 maybe?) Superboilles (talk) 07:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Superboilles, thanks for your answer! ~~~ Quaenuncabibis (talk) 09:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CFA, could you please elaborate what is missing in the article, which you moved from the mainspace to the draft space. To be honest I have never experience such a move, buy yeah, one learns new things every day. Anyway, thanks in advance for your consideration and for your help. All the best, ~~~ Quaenuncabibis (talk) 09:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Herzog

Hi, Quaenuncabibis. I noticed that in editing the Jacques Herzog article you introduced a lot of promotional text and also several broken links in the citations to external sources. I have removed the promotional waffle but perhaps you could take a look at some of the broken sourcing links (they click through to the destination site, but then go '404'). Many thanks. Paul W (talk) 13:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul W Thanks for reaching out. I was meant to be working on the article in my sand box and I am not completed working on it by far. So sorry, by switching taps, I have by mistake add the the unfinished content. Could you please revert to the original. I will add it once I am finished. So sorry again. Best, ~~~ Quaenuncabibis (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to the version of the article before you started editing. Paul W (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Paul W. Sorry again and thanks for your consideration. May I reach out to you before including new sections? Thanks and happy weekend ahead! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) Quaenuncabibis (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help where I can! Paul W (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Henchoz (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas Henchoz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quaenuncabibis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]