User talk:QuackGuru/A

	File:Playboy Vapor E-Liquid (12333061304).jpg
Fruit flavored e-liquids.

{{Db-talk}}

{{Db-u1}}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Citation_bot

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wikipropaganda-on-global-warming/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Notifications

List

"Although dual use with cigarettes is high, some youth experimenting with e-cigarettes have never tried a tobacco cigarette, which indicates that some youth are initiating use of nicotine, an addictive drug, with e-cigarettes."[124] "Similarly, in 2011 in Korea, 15% of students in grades 7 through 12 who had ever used e-cigarettes had never smoked a cigarette."[125] "The trajectory of the dual use pattern among adults or children is unclear, but studies of youth find that as many as one third of youth who use e-cigarettes have never smoked a conventional cigarette."[126]

7B

8

9

10

11

12

[207]

[208]

13

[209]

[210]

14

[211]

[212] CV FV

[213]

15

[214]

16

[215]

[216]

17

Tools

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T192744

[221]

[222]

See WP:REFUND.

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure.

See Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.

List of most-viewed YouTube videos

Special:Diff/ /

Category:Wikipedia controversies See WP:ACTIVIST.

Just visited https://archive.org/ and entered the urls into the box at top of screen.

https://curlie.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Resources/Useful_resources

Previous discussions

Initial evidences

2nd ANI reopen

Editing against the RfC closure

Quotebox

"Quote"

"Quote or Text".

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

–<ref name=/>

"Quote."

—Author's name, Source <ref name=/>

RfC

Electronic cigarette-related articles

Extended confirmed protection indefinitely for the above articles: Long-term persistent vandalism. I'd rather not start a RfC for each page. I prefer to avoid clogging up the WP:RFCs. IPs and new accounts are continuing to add unsourced content or are vandalizing the pages. See here for the previous RfC I started.

	Sockpuppetry
		New accounts that aren't actually new users (i.e. sockpuppets) are a plague on the project, with sometimes dozens of socks for a single banned editor. Administrators refuse to block a new sock account unless there is "solid evidence" of sockpuppetry. As long as an editor must provide "solid evidence" of sockpuppetry there will be sock accounts that will remain unblocked and unchecked.