User talk:Qstor2

Welcome!

Hi Qstor2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

James Tucker page

{{helpme}} newbie needs assistane with draft page on director producer. Thanks in advance Qstor2 (talk) 13:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Citing sources. Is this what you are looking for? Kleuske (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

I messed up the formatting. I was looking for assistance with creating a page for a living film director producer thanks~ Qstor2 (talk) 13:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

I noticed. What kind of help do you require? Some useful pointers might be WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:RS, etc. Also, the Teahouse may be some help. But I, sadly, cannot read you mind, only your talk-page. Kleuske (talk) 14:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Qstor2 (talk) 16:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Tucker (animator) (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Tucker (animator) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Qstor2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles O'Brien (unionist) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles O'Brien (unionist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

We started talking about this draft on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help but I wasn't able to stay.

I wonder if 'unionist' is the best disambiguator. It will be up to the accepting reviewer to decide, no need for you to change it.

It would be helpful if you learned how to use a source more than once, so it does not show up multiple times in the ref list. See WP:NAMEDREFS. It would also be helpful to use the {{cite news}} template consistently - those big bare URLs make everyone work harder.

The obituary you cited as ref 1 to "Default" has an identified - but connected - author and appears on a website named Lawfare run by Goldsmith. The citation should include that information.

Normally, articles attributed to "staff" as in ref 2 are discounted as not having an identified author. Maybe that's not a problem in this case.

DocumentCloud is not a publisher, really. The provenance of this memorandum needs more documentation if it is to be used. We see from other sources that the Detroit Free Press had made the full text of the Hoffex memorandum available, so we need to see a better tie between the Freep and the document and whatever claim there is to support its authenticity as an FBI document.

When citing the author of a newspaper article, you need to extract the actual name from the byline so you don't get ridiculous renderings like the one in ref 5.

There's a template named {{rp}} that you can use to add specific page numbers footnotes for a book that you wish to cite multiple times.

Ref 18 from Esquire is a problem. It's quoting something from the sub-headline of the article that does not appear anywhere in the article. As we all should know, editors write headlines, not reporters, so this is not a good source for that quotation. In addition, the pronoun "He" in the second sentence is too far from its antecedent, with two other male names in between. It would be best to repeat O'Brien's name at that point.

There may be enough substance in the mentions in the NYT about O'Brien to meet the notability criteria. I'm not sure it's a certainty, but cleaning up the reference citations as I've suggested should make it easier for a reviewer to make the determination. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Qstor2 (talk) 18:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles O'Brien (unionist) has been accepted

Charles O'Brien (unionist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Qstor2 (talk) 11:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:James Tucker (animator)

Hello, Qstor2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Tucker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1st Maryland Cavalry, CSA has been accepted

1st Maryland Cavalry, CSA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! How can I "officially" link to my new page. I made 2 edits and linked to it, without getting an "official" notification. Qstor2 (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I think you will only get notifications if other people link to a page you started, that is how it works for me. TSventon (talk) 13:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Harry W. Pfanz

Hello, Qstor2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harry W. Pfanz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:James Tucker (animator)

Hello, Qstor2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "James Tucker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Tucker (animator) has been accepted

James Tucker (animator), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit! Qstor2 (talk) 14:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Image of cover of dvd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Image of cover of dvd.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I got approval from the bot how to I move it to my page:

Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle Qstor2 (talk) 11:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

I think I figured it out. I "undid" the edit from the bot. I hope that was OK sorry. Still feel like a newbie. Qstor2 (talk) 11:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Image of cover of dvd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Image of cover of dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)