User talk:Qemorio

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two Chicks Walking Tours (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two Chicks Walking Tours and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Qemorio! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Two Chicks Walking Tours has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Two Chicks Walking Tours. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello Qemorio. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Qemorio. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Qemorio|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I absolutely am not being compensated in any way for this article. Writing articles for wikipedia has been on my personal list of things I have wanted to do for years. I do live in New Orleans and thought it would be good to start with companies or people of note that I personally feel are important which is what led me to writing this article. Again I am not being compensated by anyone involved in Two Chicks Walking Tours in any way. I am obviously still learning how to write wikipedia articles. It is a steeper learning curve than I thought it would be however I am looking forward to learning and exercising my writing skills. Qemorio (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. I will note that awards do not typically contribute to notability unless the award itself merits an article(like Academy Award or Nobel Peace Prize)- so the fact that this business was given an award by Tripadvisor does not contribute to the notability of the business. Most of the other sources are very brief mentions of the business, not the significant coverage to show that this business meets the definition of a notable business. In this context "significant coverage" is that which goes beyond merely telling what the business does and goes into detail about what makes it important/significant/influential as a business.

Keep in mind that the vast majority of businesses do not merit Wikipedia articles. 331dot (talk) 21:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:William P. Crowell, Jr.

Hello, Qemorio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William P. Crowell, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:William P. Crowell, Jr.

Hello, Qemorio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William P. Crowell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Two Chicks Walking Tours

Hello, Qemorio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Two Chicks Walking Tours".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two Chicks Walking Tours (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two Chicks Walking Tours and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)