User talk:PurpleLemur13

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Wimmer (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like a CV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Wimmer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Wimmer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael J Wimmer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PurpleLemur13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, Hickory! Thank you so much for your feedback. I tried to make this read less like a CV and more like the bio pages on your Talk page; would love more feedback/one more chance to get this copy correct. Thank you!

Decline reason:

Since you only seem interested in promoting yourself, there are no grounds to remove the block. If you want to edit about other topics, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 23:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PurpleLemur13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi again, I wanted to clarify that I am not Michael; my name is Taylor (as seen in the email and account registration for the account). I didn't know that the username had to be different from the article I wanted to create. That was my mistake and since my account has already been made and I incorrectly made "Michael J Wimmer" my account name AND the article page, what do you advise. I don't know how to change my username at this stage. I am just trying to create an article about Michael Wimmer for nothing other than creating an article, no self promoting. Please let me know if there are additional ways I can verify my identity. Thanks.

Decline reason:

One open request at a time please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We cannot see your email address (don't post it here, for your protection) or registration information. Since you aren't Michael Wimmer, you didn't choose to edit about him by chance- do you have an association with him or his companies? 331dot (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PurpleLemur13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi 331dot! Thank you so much for your response and feedback. I am so so sorry for all the confusion and the misleading username (as I mentioned above, I didn't realize when I created the account that I didn't need to make my username the article title name.

I am a student currently enrolled in a university near Mr. Wimmer's automotive business and for one of my early semester assignments, we were tasked with creating a Wikipedia page for a local top executive. I became aware of Mr. Wimmer and his company through an internship in the city. I noticed that Mr. Wimmer and his company did not/does not have any available information on Wikipedia, so I thought he would be a great fit for my assignment.

I believe that it would still be relevant to create this page on Mr. Wimmer, and I am hoping I will be granted access/approval to continue this process.

Again, I sincerely apologize for not following Wikipedia's username guidelines and am open to any suggestions you may have on how to be unblocked and adjust my submission for approval.

Thank you so so so much.~

Decline reason:

This is an odd situation. Wikipedia isn't a business directory – it's a general purpose encyclopedia. To demonstrate that you'll choose appropriate topics in the future, I'd like you to describe our inclusion criteria in your own words (see also Vanjagenije's statements below). After you show us that you understand our inclusion criteria, I think we can unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UPDATE: I have requested a name change to further try to remedy this error. Thank you again!

Renamed, courtesy pings to HickoryOughtShirt?4, 331dot, Daniel Case.

PurpleLemur13, Wiki Ed are usually quite good at making it clear that no course should require the creation of an article as an assessment requirement. Requiring you to write about a local "notable" who doesn't meet Wikipedia's notion of WP:Notability seems to be pushing you into a position where you'll have nothing to show for your efforts. I guess I'm asking, does your professor have much experience of Wikipedia? Knowledge of our policies on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, or reliable, verifiable, independent sources? Cabayi (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is very unfair to you as a student to require you to create an article. 331dot (talk) 17:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with you on that. Zippybonzo (talk) 07:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I truly don't know. I just thought it would be nice to highlight the local leader. I understand if I need to come back to this after I build up my Wikipedia credibility more. Thank you both for your help}.

@PurpleLemur13: Michael Wimmer is obviously not a WP:NOTABLE topic for a Wikipedia article. Notability is proved by citing reliable independent sources with significant coverage (see WP:42). In the draft your created (Draft:Michael Wimmer), you cited several sources, but the only one that even mentions Michael Wimmer is his personal LinkedIn profile (not an independent source). So, in order to be unblocked, please, answer in depth:
1. What kind of edits do you intend to make if unblocked? Do you intend to write drafts/articles about Mr. Wimmer and other non-notable topics? If not, tell us what kind of edits you plan to make.
2. Do you understand the WP:NOTABILITY rule? Explain us your understanding of that rule, in your own words. Convince us that you understand it. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PurpleLemur13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I was wondering if someone could help me with this review. I believe this piece meets all of the requirements. Thank you!

Decline reason:

Appeals are reviewed in no particular order as we find time and energy (and, generally speaking, the better the appeal, the better the response time). Please do not open more than one at a time. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Wimmer

Hello, PurpleLemur13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Wimmer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Wimmer

Hello, PurpleLemur13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Michael Wimmer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]