User talk:Przdnt

July 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 13:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Przdnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. Appealing for unblock request. I have no clue why i am literally blocked in the name of sock puppet. This account was created by me, and is not owned or made by Rydex. I have created this account myself for my own editing purpose to edit topics of my interest. IP may have been logged same because I believe I may have been connected to his Wifi while editing and he was teaching me about the new page review rights and how it works actually. Mentioning that technical logs indicate same device was used is an absurd claim to make because I was using a complete different laptop while editing. Requesting user check again to clarify this once more. Regarding paid editing, again, a complete false report. I am a fan of EDM and know about a lot of Indian artists, I was supposed to start editing about edm pages and indian music, once i was autoconfirmed, i started working on Rusha and Blizza's page and I have no connection with subject at all in any way. I know about conflict of interest and undisclosed paid editing. I'm requesting someone to do usercheck again for technical and IP here because this is totally doesn't make any sense for new editors. Przdnt (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Leaving the checkuser stuff aside(as I'm not one, what you describe is meat puppetry and a form of block evasion(by proxy). Rydex should not be assisting anyone with editing until their block is removed. 331dot (talk) 07:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Przdnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi 331dot, Again, Rydex is not assisting me after the block and never did any kind of editing through my account. I operate this account and edit out of my decisions and my own interest. Rydex was only involved in assisting me with educating and helping review Rusha & Blizza's page which I wrote myself and I also believe meatpuppetry is applicable here only when a user asks me to make an account for bad faith edits, paid editing or conflict of interest. none of which is the case here for me. I'm kindly requesting another check here please as i'm interested in editing wikipedia for good faith. Przdnt (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are addressing me, but someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 12:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rusha & Blizza moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rusha & Blizza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because UPE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]