User talk:Proudpakistani11

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Proudpakistani11. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abid Rao moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abid Rao, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Hi Proudpakistani11. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lil Keed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil Keed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Keed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Ali

If you wish to nominate an article for deletion please follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO. Giant Snowman 10:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mapogo coalition) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mapogo coalition.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Wow, most interesting article I've read today. Well done!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Wiens

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Wiens, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 05:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello Proudpakistani11. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Proudpakistani11. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Proudpakistani11|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 05:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Are there any edits (or editing on a particular article(s)) that lead you to believe the editor has a WP:COI? I noticed the editor got reverted at Lil Need, but the original edit contained a source that I believe is reliable. I've seen much worse than that--on that same article. This editor has continued to edit on Lil Keed since your admonishment here. --David Tornheim (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wide Neck

The article Wide Neck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 02:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed up the article, explained my reasoning in the talk page, and will remove the delete template in the next 24 hours if there is no objections. Proudpakistani11 (talk) 05:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodshells Revenge

Would you happen to be the IP who reverted my redirect for this article? The problem is that it has literally no sources that comply with WP:RS, and I can't find any better ones. Unless the article can be improved with in-depth reliable and independent sources, I still see a redirect as the only option. Richard3120 (talk) 21:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodshells Revenge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodshells Revenge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Soulja Boy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 21:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wide Neck moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wide Neck, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation of titles

Per MOS:CT, Wikipedia has its own rules governing capitalisation. Artists and websites/online stores frequently capitalise all words in titles; we do not follow this most of the time, particularly when it comes to prepositions and conjunctions. Please read the linked guideline. Thanks. Ss112 19:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Abid Rao

Hello, Proudpakistani11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Abid Rao.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Smash David. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Gotit. Rob van vee 05:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Proudpakistani11: You are a great editor Proudparkistani11, I love the pages you've made in the hip hop space. I'd like to help you create more pages and share hip hop knowledge with even more people. Feel free to reach out to me on Twitter @NavV96 or email njvethanayagam@gmail.com or Telegram @NavinVethanayagam

@NavinVethanayagam: Hi Navin, sorry for responding so late. I didn't check the message on my talk page, anyways, thanks you for the compliment. So you would like to help create more pages in hip hop, sure, I am definitely down for it. Can we message to each other on here? I am considering creating more rapper pages, I recently created a page for King Von but I am considering an article for Lil Duke as well. Let me know, thanks! --Proudpakistani11 (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Proudpakistani11: Hi Proudpakistani11, no worries. I wanted to talk off-site since I noticed that your Wide Neck page was removed and wanted to talk you about creating wiki pages on another knowledge project where pages like the one for Wide Neck are encouraged rather than deleted. It's quite different from Wikipedia, Genius, Quora, and other more traditional knowledge spaces in governance.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading alternate covers

Hi. In regards to the deluxe edition album cover you uploaded for So Much Fun, unless the cover is substantially different, it generally does not meet our criteria for inclusion (WP:NFCC#3, WP:NFCC#8). A version of the main cover just in a different colour is something that can easily be described and we don't need a whole different cover for. Thank you. Ss112 01:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contribute to Draft:Scott Disick

Hello, I have received permission to draft an article, Draft:Scott Disick, and had the draft page unprotected by an admin. I saw that you had commented on the talk page of the article Scott Disick, and thought you may be interested in contributing to the draft. Mukedits (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am astonished why the submission to the article of Scott Disick had been declined. He has 173 sources, and out of them, some may be random unreliable websites. But the fact that Cosmopolitian, TMZ, People, Huffington Post, The Guardian. 173 sources! Thats way more than enough? I think the article is fine as needed and doesn't need more contribution, why was the article draft denied? Is the Kardashian family intentionally not wanting Scott Disick to have his own article? --Proudpakistani11 (talk) 05:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that they do not want him to have an article. I think the article was first created before he was notable and now has a hard time overcoming that. I am on a mission to get it approved because he clearly meets the notability guidelines. I've been trying to reach out to people Mukedits (talk) 19:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I think it may help our case if you contribute to the draft, even if it is just a citation or two, to show that more editors than just me believe this article should be created. Mukedits (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Hood Baby 2 cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hood Baby 2 cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add the license in short minutes time. --Proudpakistani11 (talk) 05:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wide Neck

Hello, Proudpakistani11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wide Neck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazy But It's True cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crazy But It's True cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]