User talk:Pristino

Archive 1

United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/17

please hang on for a while, im just listening to UNGA live and updating. Thanks.(Lihaas (talk) 23:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Yeah, i dint notive all either. But thee is current talk by other states which im adding. Then i lost stuff with edit conflicts. Can you give me less than 30?

I restored per th source

Idea: if you have the video recorded you could upload somewhee?

Atala Riffo and Daughters v. Chile, formerly Karen Atala

I refactored this earlier today, based on WP:BLP1E considerations--it was essentially about the legal case, not the individual. In doing so, I noticed your POV tag I think it was yours, at least), and attempted to really hold the article to strict sources. As such, I've removed the tag. However, please let me know if you have further concerns. Best, --j⚛e decker ^talk 03:05, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

Why are you reverting my update on GDP per capita (PPP) by CIA? BlackHades (talk) 21:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article rename

Please, stop changing article names without consensus. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 09:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HH Income use of PPPs

"When PPPs for individual consumption by households are available they should be used for income distribution."

"For international comparisons it is highly recommended that PPPs be used, rather than exchange rates for conversion into a common currency. When an economic aggregate such as household income is converted using PPPs for household consumption expenditure, the conversion is made on the basis of the goods and services likely to be purchased by households for consumption purposes, as well as taking account of differences in national price levels. This allows comparisons in real terms, or purchasing power, of the converted amounts."

http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/groups/cgh/Canbera_Handbook_2011_WEB.pdf

Thus, authority suggests using PPPs for individual consumption (ie household consumption) and not actual ind consumption.

Regards,

Lneal001

I am not a big fan of using a time series, because sources and the quality changes. For instance, in the case of the US the quality has gone down quite alot since 2004, from 80% to 75% in terms of gross income, according to my own internal calculations. Furthermore, other countries use different sources altogether during certain years.

Lneal001 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think different years if its just 1 or 2 years apart means much. The difference in quality between the countries is great, so that's why I inserted a word of caution.

Lneal001 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Results table

Sorry, I very much disagree. Having three separate tables is a complete waste of time (and bandwidth). Rather than the 2013 article being changed, the other Chilean articles need to be changed to be brought in line with election articles in virtually every other country which use a single table (e.g. here, here, here, here etc).

On a separate note, I am considering combining the presidential election article with the parliamentary one into a general election article, which is also common practice for other countries (and has been used for past Chilean elections). Number 5 7 12:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pristino. I'm well aware that I don't own the article, but by the same standards, neither do you. The article should conform to standard practice, which is what I've been trying to enforce with regards to the results tables, which are not currently in the normal format (see Argentine legislative election, 2013 for how they should look - i.e. no separation of null and blank ballots and only using the title formatting in the title). As I explained above, the "norm" for Chilean articles is not standard practice and should not be used as an excuse for anything.

I also notice that you have re-added the infobox. This is not something I have touched, but it has been removed several times by other editors, again because it is not consistent with the usual format of election articles. There is also a discussion on the talk page about the infobox which you have failed to take part in. Please don't throw around accusations of uncooperative and disruptive behaviour when you are arguably more guilty of it. I look forward to seeing your comments on the infobox on the talk page. Cheers, Number 5 7 13:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT

This edit is a clear violation of WP:POINT. The results table was originally in the format I created it in. You changing it to your preferred format is clearly not in good faith. If you revert again I'm afraid I will have no choice but to report you. Number 5 7 21:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, per WP:BRD the results table stays in the original format until there is consensus to change. The other editor did not revert my change, but was in the midst of updating the figures (as you can see in the edit), and presumably saved over the top of my reversion of your pointy edit. I will not let your appalling behaviour go. Number 5 7 22:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remember your changes to Chilean election articles, which shared a different format for YEARS? Well, I accepted those changes, even though I still prefer the old format.

Eh? You didn't accept the changes - You've gone back and reverted to your preferred styles on several articles (e.g. 1970, 1989, 1993, 1999). How is this "accepting those changes"? Number 5 7 22:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the 1970 election?

Anyway, if you want a compromise on how we go forward, how about the below. It keeps the original format (which I am keen to do in order to ensure consistency acrosss Wikipedia), but splits out the blank and invalid votes (which you are keen to do). Number 5 7 22:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate	Party	Votes	%
Juan Orlando Hernández	National Party	900,626	35.62
Xiomara Castro	Liberty and Refoundation	740,973	29.31
Mauricio Villeda	Liberal Party	510,052	20.17
Salvador Nasralla	Anti-Corruption Party	360,277	14.25
Romeo Vásquez Velásquez	Patriotic Alliance	5,155	0.20
Orle Solís	Christian Democratic Party	4,354	0.17
Jorge Aguilar Paredes	Innovation and Unity Party	4,019	0.16
Andrés Pavón	FAPER-Democratic Unification Party	2,729	0.11
Blank votes		37,401	–
Invalid votes		82,934	–
Total		2,648,520	100
Registered voters/turnout		5,355,112	61.7
Source: TSE (80.14% of ballot boxes counted)

Why do we need a total valid votes row? I don't understand the point of it. Number 5 7 22:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I think it's already clear, and introducing %s for blank and invalid ballots could arguably be less clear, as some people may think they are included in the total %s. I'll sleep on it and get back to you tomorrow. Number 5 7 23:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't really see the point. I also considered the fact that such a change would effectively be a formatting change to the layout of the template, whereas splitting the blank and invalid ballots can be done within the current constraints. Given that the vast majority of articles use the existing format, it would be a lot of work to implement this change across the entire set (I'm guessing at least 6,000), and I'm not sure that the argument is strong enough to merit such a lot of work. Number 5 7 13:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having had another think and listened to the input from other editors on the talk page, I've suggested a compromise format - it includes all the additional data you would like in the table, whilst preserving the common format. If you agree, then I'll start using that on articles instead of the old one. Cheers, Number 5 7 16:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded again on the talk page. I'm not sure what else I could possibly compromise on without just accepting your version. I'd appreciate a quick resolution of this issue, as I'm holding off on creating any more articles whilst I wait to see what format I should be using. Number 5 7 21:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will you at least let the compromise version apply to the Chilean election articles? It seems pointless having exactly the same discussion there again. Number 5 7 11:13, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nohlen

I see you've realised that Nohlen was actually right for the 1999–2000 elections (as the "correct" figures you just added to the article were the ones you removed at the start of the dispute). Perhaps you should just add his data back to the 1993 election rather than leaving a "these are not the final results" disclaimer above the table. Number 5 7 08:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:M Bachelet cabinet infobox (second term)

A tag has been placed on Template:M Bachelet cabinet infobox (second term) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:S Piñera cabinet infobox

A tag has been placed on Template:S Piñera cabinet infobox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GDP data in the chapter "indicators" of OECD

Note that the GDP (as well as the GDP per capita) data - you've just changed in the OECD article, were copied from other articles whose data are outdated. The updated data are now available at WB website. HOOTmag (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As for the GDP data: I apologize for my mistake.

As for the FSI: the index gives a united figure for two different countries - as if they were one united country, so logically it can be nothing - other than an average - even if each country had the same figure as the second country had. Just as the pair of Montenegro and Panama - that have identical figures - would have an "average" if they were indicated as if they were a united entity, and the pair of Kuwait and Antigua & Barbuda, Albania and Brunei, Serbia and El Salvador, Turkey and Cape Verde, Jordan and Venezuela, Benin and Turkmenistan, China and Fiji, Gambia and Madagascar and Colombia, Philippines and Equatorial Guinea, Togo and Libya, Timor-Leste Nepal and Egypt, Libreia and Myanmar, Ethiopia and Niger. HOOTmag (talk) 12:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you think this concept of "average" must be interpreted as an average between - a (hypothetical) "figure" of the first country - and a (hypothetical) "figure" of the other country, when you can - more simply - interpret it as a weighted average between - the (actual) data of the first country - and the (actual) data of the other country. HOOTmag (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of legislatures by number of members

If you are so interested in requesting sources for the data published in the list, you should consider to add the same kind of reliable sources for all legislatures that appears on the table. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 00:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't said that. But maybe you can consider that The World Factbook doesn't have the absolute truth about information, it could have some errors or be too generic in some aspects (like rounding the number of legislature members). In that case, you also could search more reliable sources in other cases that appears on the table, and add them to get a more exact data. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel prizes per capita

What relation do Kailash Satyarthi or Malala Yousafzai have to the UK? The Nobel citation page and their wikipedia articles only link them to India and Pakistan. Udzu (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Udzu (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Pristino! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of films banned in Chile

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of films banned in Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.emol.com/noticias/documentos/peliculas_prohibidas.asp and http://www.http://www.shock.cl/foro/viewtopic.php?t=7615&sid=d3dbb4f2fece7f49ef3e217f5cdbcbcd. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 121.214.61.75 (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your very timely and high quality writing of the 2015 Nepal earthquake article! Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

130.225.165.20 (talk) 09:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)== About data on Chilean Regions ==[reply]

Heya!

I read your superb updates on Economic indices of Chilean Regions. I am especially interested in the development of the Gini Coefficients of the regions, but since my Spanish isn't that good, I find it difficult to find what I need. Do you know if there's data over more years than 2013 only? I would very much appreciate of you could get back to me.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaskeradeRosen (talk • contribs) 20:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inequality among Chilean Regions

Hi!

Somehow I managed to delete my own section. If you know if there is data on the inequality among Chilean regions over time - please get back to me. You could send me an e-mail to gustavagneman@hotmail.com

I'd really appreciate it Best regards Gustav Agneman

MaskeradeRosen (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View in Argentina/Colombia/Chile/Uruguay

You've reverted my edit redirecting Google Street View in Uruguay to the continent article without an edit summary; please provide a summary next time you revert someone, as otherwise it is very difficult to understand what your intentions are. Now, that said, what do you feel is achieved by having a separate article for Google Street View coverage in these articles? There is already a relevant continent-level article, Google Street View in South America, and these countries are not particularly unique in terms of coverage. Google Street View in Israel, for example, incorporates significant commentary on use by terrorist networks and political issues with its expansion. I think these articles are really better merged to the continent article; the coverage of Street View in an average country is probably not going to have a substantial body of work to base an article on. —^0xF₈E₈ (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Google Street View in Uruguay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Google Street View in Uruguay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Street View in Uruguay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Report

Seeing as you've continued to ignore WP:BRD, I've filed a report on you here. Number 5 7 11:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pristino. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ñuble Province

Hi. Thanks very much for updating the details at this article, [1]. Would you also be able to update, or add, a source for the information, because unfortunately, the way it is now, the existing citation doesn't support the content. Thanks again for keeping this updated. Cheers. -- Begoon 02:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pristino. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent change in OECD

Would you like to explain your change? Please notice that the source supports the old version you've changed. HOTmag (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, revert if necessary. Pristino (talk) 07:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done HOTmag (talk) 07:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pristino. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American Barnstar

		The Latin American Barnstar
		For the initial creation of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States article, as well as other significant contributions to articles about Latin American countries. Best, MarioGom (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Maria McKee does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Boric

Hey, I noticed that you made some edits to the Gabriel Boric article regarding the "Ć" at the end of his last name. I don't really want to get involved in that argument, I'm sure some people will be in favor of the change and others against, but the reason why I'm writing this is because you removed the link to the article of Miodrag Marinović that I wrote, I would appreciate it if the link could stay there, otherwise the entire article would be meaningless since it isn't linked in any other article as far as I'm aware. If the "Ć" is that big of an inconvenience I'm sure the page can be moved.

Anyways, I didn't want to make any change without letting you know first and hearing your thoughts about it. Thanks, AtomsRavelAz talk 14:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your sensible approach. I've reinstated the link to Miodrag Marinović in the Gabriel Boric article. Though I also think Marinovic needs to be written without the ć (don't worry, I won't change it), for the same reason Jennifer Lopez is not spelled Jennifer López here. Pristino (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Election Certification Court moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Election Certification Court, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ken Rosato

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ken Rosato, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yanix Revert

Hi there @Pristino,

I wanted to ask you about the expansion tag reversion on Yanix. I saw you added a lot more information (which is great by the way), but did you add everything that was not already in the English Wikipedia? To me at least, if not everything was brought over, the expansion tag should stay there just on the off chance that somebody would want to fill out the remaining details. This is just my opinion, though.

Again, thank you for expanding the page! Losipov (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Every bit of information from the Russian Wikipedia article was brought over to the English Wikipedia article. It is very easy to compare the two. Greetings. Pristino (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Elections in Chile. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:53, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Gabriel Boric

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gabriel Boric, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ceacheí

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ceacheí, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Gabriel Boric

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gabriel Boric, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ceacheí

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ceacheí, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adele Edits

Hi Pristino,

Thanks so much for your edits to Adele's page. Several, in particular those surrounding the use of leading pronouns in paragraphs, were long overdue! I have reworked a trio of words in your first edit to the article's lead in accordance with MOS:PUFFERY. While I recognize the interest in avoiding repetition, that must be balanced with appropriate encyclopedic language. Additionally, for the edits you have undertaken, as per WP:MINOR, they should not have been flagged as minor. I suggest reading through the criteria for a minor edit to avoid future confusion. All the best, and thank you again! SSR07 (talk) 20:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, points well taken. Though I'm not sure I see a big difference between "huge" and "immense". Cheers. Pristino (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gross domestic product per capita" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gross domestic product per capita has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 26 § GDP per capita until a consensus is reached. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Election Certification Court

Hello, Pristino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Election Certification Court, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Election Certification Court has been accepted

Election Certification Court, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cambalachero (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Operation Al-Aqsa Flood

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of heads of state of Chile

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of heads of state of Chile. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of presidents of Chile. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of presidents of Chile. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 05:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of countries by Nobel laureates per capita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by Nobel laureates per capita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by Nobel laureates per capita (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Artem.G (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]