Jump to content

User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12→Archive 15

Macintosh Revert

Since when was good grammar "spam"? I'm a real person contributing to the clarity and accuracy of various Wikipedia articles. I can grammatically explain my edits below and see no reason they should be reverted:

The comma before "which" is necessary because it always introduces a nonrestrictive clause. The comma after "by the end of 1994" isn't necessary but helps with clarity after an introductory phrase. The first word after a colon shouldn't be capitalized if it begins a dependent clause. This article is written in American English about an American company, so "their" should be "its" in both cases since collective nouns are singular in American English rather than plural (the word is referring to "Macintosh"). No comma necessary before "but came to be known..." since it's a dependent clause. "And the desktop" should be removed because according to the wording before the parentheses, it's clear that all four computers listed inside are desktop computers, so it's only redundant and makes it more difficult to understand.

(The link that was changed, though, wasn't me - or perhaps accidentally. So I guess that needs to be fixed, but all other edits should at least be welcomed, if not needed.) JustAMuggle (talk) 18:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

It wasn't your edit, but several in between where I reverted it to that it would have taken a substantial rewrite to get it to the non-spam version created by several spam IPs and accounts. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Cæsey / Rufus Rose

Not sure what your opinion on this is, but do you think there's any chance that Cæsey is I Love Bridges? I saw Rufus Rose's edits at test.wikipedia, where they added back a test wiki site which is run by Xauroflaux (an account tagged as ILB sock on the talk page, later IP on that talk page belongs to ILB). The additions at test.wikipedia were also previously done by ILB sock (Comfycozybeds). -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 00:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Noting that they’ve now been globally locked. That usually points to ann LTA case. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:55, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Kathleen Hogan thanks and category typo

First - thanks!

Second, in the "give them an inch and they take a yard" department, could you please be even more kind and correct right at the very bottom of that page, where it says

[[Category:Stanford Graduate School of Business alumn]]

- twice! - and make it instead say

[[Category:Stanford Graduate School of Business alumni]]

I think I made that typo in the draft, where under nowiki it doesn't turn angry red instead of peaceful blue, but is quite visible now. --GRuban (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

GRuban You're welcome to correct it yourself? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:04, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
I also noticed you disclosed your COI/PE status regarding that article. I don't think it's an issue to make minor changes such as fixing a typo. If you prefer, I can still do it but I don't believe anyone would have issue with that. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Just COI. All right, will go boldly unto the breach. If nothing else I can link to your comment. Thanks! --GRuban (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
I will gladly defend you if it's an issue, assuming you're not under a tban/required request. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

13:28:13, 29 May 2018 review of submission by Rlconrad7

Rlconrad7 (talk)

Regarding you undoing my valid edits on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_megachurches_in_the_United_States Line 1,714: Glide Memorial Church still lists Dr. Karen Oliveto<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.glide.org/Leadership#Karen%20Oliveto as senior pastor. I updated to Rev. Dr. Jay Williams<ref>{{cite web |url=https://glidesf.wordpress.com/2017/07/18/four-questions-for-rev-jay-williams/ and clearly marked the website confirming the change from almost a year ago. What is the issue? Rlconrad7 (talk) 18:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

It's a blog and it's not a reliable source, Rlconrad7. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

19:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Review of Draft:Liara Roux

Hello, Chrissymad. On 15 May you marked my draft as unfit for publishing due to a lack of reliable sources. I've reviewed WP:RS and I'm still unsure which of my sources would be considered appropriately reliable, and which are not. I was hoping you could shed some light on which of my cited sources you found to be insufficiently reliable, so that I may make edits to the draft to get it up to code before submitting for review again. Thank you. Labot2001 (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Review draft: Paul Bulencea

Hello Chrissymad. On May 17 you declined my submission again, with the same arguments as before, even though I have edited it quite radically, especially the sources, which I consider reliable. Can you please help me little bit more, stating why it seems to be not notable or reliable. The advertisement purposes you are mentioning are really not the case (and not necessary for this person in this way). Thank you very much fro any comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baboras (talk • contribs) 13:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Hofbrau

Can you please explain your reversion of Hofbrau to a version that is devoid of all regional distinctions regarding California hofbraus? The distinction has existed since the earliest revisions of the article in 2006, and your deletion provided no explanation. The information you deleted is sourced and notable, particularly important since a link to a disambiguation article is provided. California hofbrau is not the same as German hofbrau. 67.170.206.242 (talk) 02:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

  • The information is unreliably sourced, and it seems to me that you are unduly restricting this article to one region. But that's just me. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Regarding the sources, it's true that there is not very much to speak to the regional importance and prevalence of hofbrau to California, specifically Northern California. This style of food service simply isn't as common once you venture farther east than Nevada, and it's unlikely that anyone will ever write a book about it. My guess about why previous versions of the article included a "last remaining hofbraus" list that was so prevalently Californian is they were trying to emphasize that point. Anyway, California hofbraus aren't German beergardens. They are a specific type of carvery-based cafeterias, and I'm not trying to champion anything that wasn't previously written by others who also know the difference (until deleted with no explanation by drive-by IP accounts and re-deleted by Chrissymad). 67.170.206.242 (talk) 03:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Blogspot is not an RS and it only served as a plug for someone's blog. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't understand the reason why you delete my text in Vimar page. Please don't be fury! Report the text at the complete vesrion, TNK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stelladellealpi (talk • contribs) 13:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Comparison of machine translation applications page

Hi Chrissymad, I'm new to updating Wikipedia pages. A staff added my product to this comparison page years ago. I just updated the information. You removed not only the changes but the information that was there for years. Can you help guide me to restoring the updates without violating Wikipedia guidelines? Thanks. Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slaterocks (talk • contribs) 16:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Jessica McKenna

Hello, I see you’ve read requested speedy deletion for my article Jessica McKenna. The article has several citations, is written in a neutral tone, and is about a someone with several notable credits. Can you please clarify what you feel is wrong with the article? I’d be happy to fix. †Basilosauridae❯❯❯Talk 15:01, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

It's incredibly promotional, even in just the first line but throughout the entire thing and hinges entirely on exaggerated poorly sourced fluff. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The only line that had any “exaggerated fluff” is the first line, which is cited. Multiple citations can be found that support that she is known and lauded for musical improv. However, if you don’t feel it is appropriate for the article, the line can be easily deleted and does not warrant deleting the whole article. I think if you were to review again, you would find that is the only part of the article that could be considered “exaggerated” as the article is written in an encyclopedic tone. If there are other examples you feel don’t match the tone, I’d be happy to adjust them. †Basilosauridae❯❯❯Talk 15:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The entire article is based on sources which are basic listings and a single local paper review. So it's still promotional because it's not based on what independent reliable sources say either and is very coatracky. This is just far too soon for an article on her. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I appreciate your feedback. Can you clarify what would be considered independent reliable sources, or point me in a direction where I can learn more?†Basilosauridae❯❯❯Talk 15:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maryland's 46th legislative district

Hello, Chrissymad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maryland's 46th legislative district".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Shadowowl Please use some common sense when tagging g13. I'd hardly call a draft on my userpage that says "Currently working on" abandoned. Some due dilligence is appreciated before mass tagging abandoned drafts, particularly when they're not at AfC and an editor is still highly active. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Slap a {{Promising draft}} on it or move it into userspace. The backlog is currently higher than 1000 and I am sorry for any inconvenience. -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Shadowowl I find it highly inappropriate to put promising draft on my own content but your AfC backlog comment makes absolutely no sense. It's never been in the AfC queue and does not contribute a single bit to the backlog. Please stop mass nominating g13 in general. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok. I will not CSD tag any more of your articles. -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Shadowowl It's not about what I've created but mass nominating potentially notable topics of g13 in draft space - particularly those that are not in the AfC queue just based on the fact that it's reached a certain age is bordering on disruptive. Please actually look at what you're nominating before just slapping g13 on it because "it's old." CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I take a look at everything. But 95% is just
You're missing my point, Shadowowl. You made a fuss about drafts contributing to the backlog, so why waste time tagging g13s on stale drafts that have no impact on the backlog, instead of focusing on the actual backlog? I find mass tagging of g13s to be disruptive when it's done without care. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi friend

Regarding my article Eduard Irimia, there is not a fan perspective at all, I just mentioned some of his names since he is a promoter. Lou DiBella and other great boxing promoters have the same. But the guy is a great guru of kickboxing. I just moved the TV production part on Superkombat (his current kickboxing promotion) where it belongs. It's also ok to announce the Creed II part because he is lauching to film industry. I wrote about philanthropy and awards because Dana White and others have the same. This is his CV and history, some other kickboxing user already helped me to rewrite it and to brush it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ILoveCasablanca (talk • contribs) 18:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

ILoveCasablanca Please do not remove maintenance tags for articles you have created yourself. The content is highly promotional and needs to be rewritten significantly. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, thanks. What about the cover photo, it's not allowed? I thought cover photos are allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ILoveCasablanca (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
ILoveCasablanca No, per the two messages I left and pinged you about on your user talk. Please also remember to sign your name by using 4 tildes at the end of your edit. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok, sorry, have a great day! ILoveCasablanca (talk • contribs) 18:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

consider self revert

You may want to revise this to keep your own hands clean, and then review the how-to info at the WP:Conflict of interest noticeboard. Especially, note the 2nd bullet under additional info NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not outing anyone - he cited material that when searched brings up the paper I linked (available freely, online) along with nearly identical content and his editing pattern shows a clear conflict of interest. I think it's a fair question to ask if the person he has spammed wikipedia with for 8 years, along with D. Lempert's website, is the editor himself or an associate. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I'll note there is no personal information include, per WP:OUTING and I've done nothing aside from ask him to identify a conflict of interest, should one exist. In either case, the continued addition of inappropriate sources linked all to one person who, as far as I can tell, is not an expert in their field or published in reliable sources, brings up a grave concern about the intent of the editor. If my edit came across as outing, I apologize but I have not violated that policy as nothing I've linked contains any personal information and only goes directly back to content which the editor sourced themselves. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
@NewsAndEventsGuy: Do you understand what outing actually is ? Does anybody have a fucking clue how this site works anymore ? Does anybody give a shit about the behaviour of editors like User:X. Squire ? Nick (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
OK NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm so sorry!

Dear Chrissymad,

I'm so sorry if I offended you. About my first page I can tell you I'm learning. The issue about page Roberto Brambilla was that I have written that "quotation" in my sandbox and I have forgotten to get away. I am asking help to improve the page. If you could recommend a good way, that would be great.

Thank you, Lucamodena (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


[REPOST] 19:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Review of Draft:Liara Roux

Chrissymad, the message that I'd left for you was archived before you had the chance to respond, so I'm reposting it here in full(Labot2001 (talk) 23:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)): Hello, Chrissymad. On 15 May you marked my draft as unfit for publishing due to a lack of reliable sources. I've reviewed WP:RS and I'm still unsure which of my sources would be considered appropriately reliable, and which are not. I was hoping you could shed some light on which of my cited sources you found to be insufficiently reliable, so that I may make edits to the draft to get it up to code before submitting for review again. Thank you. Labot2001 (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Praxidicae, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

On the issue of "5G" page- June 2018 5G Govt. auction of South Korea

Hi, I am an active 5G PhD researcher and electronic engineer having IEEE journal and conference publications. Owing to the nature of my work, I keep a pretty close connection with every single major 5G related tech news/researches currently going in the world including close academic ties/networking with 5G researchers of other countries. I would like to demand further explanation on what basis did you just wrote "not a valid source" and discarded the information of South Korea's govt. auction of 5G spectrum held on June 15 2018. What do you mean by "not a valid source"? I gave three national news links including Arirang News, Korea Herald, and Yonhap news containing the Ministry of Science and ICT South Korea's official statement in the news link. I would like to know your precise connection with 5G research (academic/professional/or just earned through net browsing) and have a justifiable explanation of your reversal. Drmnh (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Drmnh I don't have any expertise in the area but that is irrelevant as what I removed were not reliable sources. This is an encyclopedia which requires verifiability, not a forum. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
You should probably also read WP:OWN. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Chrissymad Both WP:OWN and reliable sources. apply to you and other editors as well. I took a while to scour through the existing references. To my surprise, I am dumbfounded at references 14,15, 16 claiming Qatar's Ooredoo being world's first 5G service provider, which do not fall in reliable sources. but still crowning this page with all their glory. Same goes to references 34, 35, 36 claiming 5G frequency's radiation risk to human body which are nothing but self-opinionated blogs/webpage. To claim it a fact, results must appear in major medical journals NOT in trivial or personal webpage. Or even at least the topic should be a talk of town in major 5G/tech conferences which I am unheard of even though my active association. I can go on for 51- 54, 57, 59, 60, 61, 74. I wonder trivial blogs, opinionated pages like 14,15, 16, 34,35,36 could take place as reliable sources. but three national news sources of South Korea could not become reliable sources.. Under what basis national news agencies of a country are regarded unverifiable source? I would like to know. Drmnh (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Drmnh So fix it?. I removed the edit because it triggered an edit filter and was not a false positive. Cite sources but you don't need to link to a random youtube clip. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Chrissymad In that case, you could just remove the YouTube source, not the other two valid links. AnywayDrmnh (talk) 17:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Is there an SPI case for the socks imitating your name?

I found some more and want to add them. Thanks. Ping me please. Doug Weller talk 13:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Doug Weller There are 2 or 3 that I know of, it's usually a mix between phoenix, thepoliticsexpert and I can't recall the third. They usually just create a username similar to mine rather than full out imitation. Got a link? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Doug Weller I'd also imagine Cundt is related to Crissymad (and OS worthy as it's a not so nice word) but doesn't strike me as either of the two I listed above. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Just kidding, after reading the TP on cundt, that's definitely phoenix. I'll actually email you, there's a handful of LTAs this could be. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Did you email me? Anyway, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134. Doug Weller talk 13:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:48:32, 25 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Kevin Plunkett


Kevin Plunkett (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello Chrissymad: 

Thank you for your assistance. I just wanted to note that this is my first submission and so I may have some inexperience with the writing and rules including required reference rules. I just wanted to note that all of the references that I utilized for this article except for the first reference, which was from a online copy of a journal, were attributed to the preface to Algernon Sydney Logan's journal 'Vistas from a Stream' Volume I which is   biographical sketch of his father written by his son, Robert Restalrig Logan. I just wanted to ask if this reference source is not sufficient. Thank you very much.

Kevin Plunkett Kevin Plunkett (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Kirinyaga University

I had already declined Draft:Kirinyaga University because of the mainspace article, and added an infobox and a reference to the mainspace article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

MAS 36 article

Hello, I understand wikipedia is not a source, but translations from foreign language wikipedia articles about a subject whose provenance is in that language are well accepted. Perhaps I shouldn't list them as a reference, but their use as source material is well accepted. I have removed their use as a cited source and added quite a few other references. I would ask that you please point to any issues you may have with my edit without deleting my work entirely. Thank you. Sb pete (talk) 18:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Sb pete A random website is not a reliable source nor is it subject to meaningful editorial oversight. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:48, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

What website are you referring to as random?Sb pete (talk) 19:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Sb pete armesfrancaises.free.fr is not a reliable source. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

That is crazy talk. Have you looked at the website? Can you read French? What about the other 10 or so sources i used? Frankly, i understand you taking issue with citations, but i cannot for the life of me understand how you think you are justified in completely deleting a large expansion of the information in that article using MANY sources.Sb pete (talk) 19:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Sp pete Not a single other source you included is subject to editorial oversight nor were they reliable. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
And to break it down for you:
and I could go on... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Chrissymad Australian Shooter is a published monthly magazine. As such, it has an editor.

Same for Small Arms Review which is about the closest thing to a peer reviewed scholarly journal you'll find in the firearms world. Forgottenweapons.com is absolutely a reliable and an authoritative source on firearms history. Are you seriously contending i have no reliable sources or are you just being obstinant? Sb pete (talk) 19:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Sb pete You really need to calm down. I am saying that the source you provided are largely unreliable. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
They're not what I'd call reliable sources, for the most part. Find better sources or give up. Nick (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not mad or even agitated. I'm simply trying to understand where you're coming from while respectfully disagreeing with you. The forgottenweapons page you call a blog is indeed a blog, but that entry is hosting for a primary source document in that it is a long and detailed interview with one of the head engineers responsible for development of the latter variants discussed. Small Arms Review is not a "review site" it is a serious publication for technical and professional audiences. You are biasing your judgements based on zero knowledge of the subject matter. I object Sb pete (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Sb pete I see you've changed it back, yet again, despite two editors telling you the sources were not acceptable. Please revert it as it's nearing WP:3RR as well. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

And you have yet again failed to elaborate on why you think articles in published magazines and journals, translation from the native language wikipedia article, an interview with one of the weapon designers, and a specialist website featuring innumerable pictures of the items in question as well as original manuals, diagrams, and engineering drawings fails to meet your standard of reliable source. I understand you don't like my linking to a forum, despite it being the hosting for a scanned 1990's article by a published magazine as well as a great pictographic reference which was only listed in the external sources section, but you have failed to do anything constructive here other than actively impede the spread of knowledge and call me names. Shame on you. Sb pete (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Agba Nojie Article Why do you keep reverting this article back to the old version -- The article should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the articles content is not copied from any page or website , the story is about the Esan People and Bini people in what is now Edo State in Nigeria and it is a true story about the history of the Esan People of Edo State --100.16.128.120 (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

21:07:00, 27 June 2018 review of submission by FeWorld


Hi, you recently declined the submission for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ice_Poseidon on grounds of notability. Could you provide some reasoning for this since I have many sources from articles wholly on the subject such as Rolling Stone, Vice, Kotaku, Polygon, Fox and more. This article has repeatedly been declined on grounds of notability and I have improved it many times.

Even on the articles for creation help desk people who have helped me in improving this article have expressed that the argument to decline on notability is wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2018_June_13#04:44:14,_13_June_2018_review_of_submission_by_FeWorld

Feedback would be great as I believe the subject is clearly notable.

Thanks FeWorld (talk) 21:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Please wait don't remove this article

(Iranian director ) Kurdistantolive (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

This man is famous actor and film director in Iran , please wait don't remove Kurdistantolive (talk) 15:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

I wait your answer Kurdistantolive (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Shaily Pandey

Hi, I've resubmitted the article Draft:Shaily Pandey. Can you please review it again? Thanks. --Princessruby (talk) 21:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cranksgiving

Information icon Hello, Chrissymad. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cranksgiving, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Please stop editing my links and commenting on my page. I am completing a project through my school for an organization. Thank you. Rcar01 (talk) 18:31, 29 June 2018 (UTC)rcar01

Rcar01 Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a homework assignment and what you were doing is linkspamming. If you do so again, you will likely be blocked. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I am not completing a "homework assignment." I am not linkspamming, I am adding resources, which is typical of a Wikipedia page. Please stop threatening me and deleting my edits. Rcar01 (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

All you've done is add the ame source url to dozens of pages with no other constructive edits. Stop doing so. And you just said this is a school assignment on behalf of an organization. You must also disclose this but you absolutely must stop link spamming. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:36, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

The links are constructive to researchers looking for further information, which is one of the advantageous aspects of conducting research on Wikipedia. These opinions are subjective and I have done nothing wrong. You have also stated that you are not an administrator, and like I said, I have done nothing wrong. Rcar01 (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Working on behalf of another organization to add their links to wikipedia is a violation of policy and general decorum. It's linkspamming. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I am not getting paid, Chrissymad. Rcar01 (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

And yet you just said that it's part of an assignment for an organization, which is why I linked COI. In any case, repeatedly adding the same url all over WP is not helpful nor is it allowed. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is your opinion and not a fact. Please stop changing my edits and threatening me.

There are no threats, I'm telling you what is commonly practiced, applied and policy on Wikipedia. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
See the conversation above, Maile66. How is Rhode Islands archives any more relevant to African Americans than any other state archives? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
This is absolutely a clear cut COI issue as it is part of an assignment to mass add external links to several pages. I will gladly back off if someone can explain, clearly, why RI's state archives are any more relevant or important to general topics such as Women's suffrage in the United States, African Americans, Racial segregation in the United States, than any other state archives? If a user is directed to, as part of an assignment, mass add links across a website, that is the definition of WP:LINKSPAM. Furthermore, it's been explained to them, they continued to readd it, even after reversion instead of discussing and even continued after this conversation, which I'd argue is in violation of 3RR. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I will gladly explain. If you look closely at the links I am adding such as the "African-American Collection" you removed, the collection had primary documents relevant to African-Americans nationwide from 1652-1855. This is not just Rhode Island information, therefore it is incredibly relevant. Rcar01 (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Which still doesn't answer my question. But I'll ask this directly, Rcar01 since there appears to be a conflict of interest. What is the organization that you are doing this through/for? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:31, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I do not feel comfortable disclosing that information. Rcar01 (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

If you are editing on behalf of or at the direction of an organization but cannot disclose it, you should not be editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:36, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Mentioned at ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is School project for the State of Rhode Island. (notified on behalf of Maile66) - TNT 💖 20:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Farid Sajadhosseini

Good morning Chrissymad .Now I add 4 references to this article (Persian language)

I wait your answer please
Best regards Kurdistantolive (talk) 07:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Give me one chance Kurdistantolive (talk) 07:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
As you like if you want remove this article it is no problem for me . I just try to stay this article in wikipedia because this man is a famous actor and film director in his country (Iran) Kurdistantolive (talk) 07:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Worth an SPI?

Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards (ASFAs) and Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards 2017, what do you think - sockpuppets of Shadrackmarkug? Thanks, TMGtalk 19:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Reverting edits for Rakhi Sawant

Hi I just recently joined and just noticed u have been reverting my edits you are doing it without explaining why please can you stop VishalSingh220 (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Draft:Igorrr

I'm very confused as to how the draft is not adequately sourced by reliable sources? There are 36 sources in the article, including from such publications as the Chicago Reader, Allmusic, Ultimate Guitar, MetalSucks, Loudwire, Metal Hammer, Blabbermouth, and Metal Injection, as well as the websites of various music festivals. Are these not reliable sources? It's frankly ridiculous that this article has been declined twice (and the only reason it went through draft is because an administrator locked the main page after it was recreated following a deletion years ago). RF23 (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Can I please get an explanation for this?RF23 (talk) 01:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
They are mostly primary sources, such as interviews, passing mentions or mill type coverage, like tour dates. None of which are significant or indepth coverage. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
And if you could kindly stop with the uncivil edit summaries, it would be greatly appreciated. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation. I would argue that the chicago reader profile, this article, the allmusic bio, the metal injection article about signing with metal blade, this interview and the Metal hammer article are all beyond passing mentions or run of the mill coverage. It could definitely use more sources and coverage, but I think it has enough to justify an article. I've seen probably hundreds of articles of bands that are sourced worse and have had no issues existing or even passing AfD's. Is the draft process more strict then just creating an article outright? RF23 (talk) 02:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your last statement, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. The sources, however, Chicagoreader seems to be good, Jankysmooth doesn't seem to be widely read, a listing on AllMusic is not in-depth coverage - it's a basic bio, metalinjection is okay, an interview is not coverage. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

AIV

I was wondering why this edit removed my earlier report? Did I do something incorrectly? Luckily, another editor made a subsequent reprt and the disruptive one is now blocked. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Eagleash That's actually really, really strange! I used Twinkle, so it appears to be a bug of some sort. I definitely didn't remove it myself (nor have I edited AIV manually today.) But it does look correct. Sorry about that, I'll report it! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Ah... Twinkle and most of the other 'auto' gadgets are a mystery to me at the best of times! Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:July 2017 flood in Maryland

Information icon Hello, Chrissymad. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:July 2017 flood in Maryland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Changes on Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools

Hi, a colleague of mine asked for some clarification as to what has been happening regarding changes “Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools” on 6 June 2018 please.

It appears your initial edits removed a bunch of tools from this page and your comments were “cleanup, rmv nn, el”

While I profess that I am a complete novice in regards to what is and isn’t proper for a Wikipedia page, it appears a bunch of tools were removed for some sort of non-compliance? I’m not sure what “cleanup, rmv nn, el” means exactly (guessing “rmv” means remove) but what is nn and el please?

Prior to your work on ”Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools” on 4 June 2018, was the page not compliant or somehow breached Wikipedia rules? If so, why were the software comparisons not removed sooner? Some software remains, but could you please clarify why that software was left and yet others removed or maybe please point me to the rule breach so I can understand exactly what is and isn’t allowed so I can help explain it to my colleague please.

I have no direct relationship with any of the companies listed that you removed, but I can see there was an attempt to restore it, which your response was “this is spam”. While the definition of spam may be open to some interpretation in the interests of clarity, I would very much appreciate if you can help me understand or at least point me in the right direction.

I don’t think your edits were necessarily punitive, but possibly removed because they didn’t comply?

Again, I stress I have no idea how the editing process works, but it does seem like there are a significant amount of rules and guidelines to ensure wiki entries are compliant. I can only guess this one may not have been compliant for some time and your changes now fit the guidelines? Obviously some software is allowed to be listed, but is there a rule on what can and can’t be listed please? Thank you for you time and I look forward to better understanding these changes please. 

Dabrown1 (talk) 09:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Removed multiple table rows in "Comparison of file verification software"

About --> Revision as of 11:08, 4 June 2018 Why did you remove the majority of the table rows in article "Comparison of file verification software"? Your comment says "Massive link farm", but I am trying to understand why you consider all of those rows to be bad or unreliable links. Jmonti824 (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

What am I doing wrong?

Hello, Yesterday I tried to change a redirect into an actual page for Luciana Ravizzi. The redirect doesn't even go to correct section (its old). I have done the whole page of which all is fact. I have also included references to verify that this is in fact her. Can you please advise why you keep reverting? Absolutrosk (talk) 08:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC) You managed to undo all of my edits seconds after I made them (3 times), can you please respond to my query? I have done everything asked and am not sure what I am doing wrong. Please advise. Absolutrosk (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder

Hey Chrissymad, thank you for sending me AFCH participant's criteria. Unfortunately, I skipped it unintentionally. I will refrain from further reviewing until i meet the criteria.

Kostas Greece91 (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Pema Browne

I am in the process of creating this page for Pema Browne and you keep placing a deletion on the page. This is extremely unhelpful and really ridiculous. I'm sure you could police other sites, it's a large web out there. She just passed away and I'm trying to create this page.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jungleboy65 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Jungleboy65 If you wish to contest the deletion, follow the instructions in the notice. Also please keep your uncivil comments to yourself. They're not appreciated. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

No uncivil comments just please stop trolling and mind your own bushiness! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jungleboy65 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Jungleboy65 No one is trolling, the directions on the deletion notice are in big bold letters. Please stop insulting people because you refuse to read them and dislike the way an encyclopedia works. The next time you come to a user's page to call them a troll for restoring a deletion notice that is currently being discussed, you're going to find yourself at WP:ANI. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

I told you I am in the middle of resourcing and creating the page, please leave me alone to do the work! No need to threaten me with banishment from Wikipedia. Thank you

Jungleboy65 Then I suggest you read what the deletion notice says. It's not up for speedy deletion, it's up for a 7 day discussion, which you should participate in if you find that you disagree. I'd also suggest you cut out the name calling immediately. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Please Chrissy let's end this so I can work. Thank You

You guys are really too much. My god my mom just died and I'm trying to make this page, as she was a well known artist and literary agent in New York City. And all u do is flag it for deletion before I'm done and tell me to read links. You guys are absolutely no help at all. I don't how old you guys are, but this is really grade school stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jungleboy65 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jungleboy65: We don't allow biographies on Wikipedia without sources - could you link to 3 or 4 significant newspaper articles about Pema Browne and we can revisit the deletion, if necessary. Nick (talk) 20:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Listen Nick I have all of the supporting articles, but no one gave me a chance to even site them. I was in the process of doing that, but everyone kept wanting to delete the article. To be honest, I am a published author and write for many national magazines for the past 30 years and I have never seen such arbitrary policing of any site. I have contributed to Wikipedia in the past and never had this type of issue. You are making this very difficult for anyone to want to even participate in this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jungleboy65 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


Regarding Latinos in Action page edits

Hi Chrissy, can you explain why my edits for this page were reverted? The original page didn't have any sources and I linked several other pages, so I'm confused why you would have deleted them. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia so my apologies if this comment isn't formatted correctly. Mockingbirdkayla (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)mockingbirdkayla

Macomb Page

How is adding information about the local public radio station in the news media category considered spam? How is it considered promotional to add additional bullets under the attractions and events category? Please stop changing the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScoopU (talk • contribs) 19:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Feedback

Do you think Human Rights Watch qualifies as independent/reliable/published? I realize it's not "a range", I was hoping that as a stub it could attract a wider range but I wasn't sure where to look.

In what what could I make the tone more formal? This is an article reporting on grievances which were expressed over 10 years ago, not expressing grievances. I'm not sure what is meant by peacock here, I'm basing the name of the article on an established precedent of how to describe family separation policies of various administrations. ScratchMarshall (talk) 18:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

ScratchMarshall Sourcing aside, the entire tone of the draft sounds to me like someone with a grievance rather than just basing it on fact. Like "look, they did it too!" I think you need to reword this in particular and expand in detail. The 1996 policy is vastly different than that of 2008 and 2018, so the whole "From 1997-2000 over a million children/spouses had their families split up" is somewhat misleading and emotional. Overall I think it's misleading (not sure if it's intentional or not) as your source here does not state or imply that families were forcefully separated (as in, traveled into the US together and forcefully removed from one another) just that a travel restriction/ban prevented return access but it actually does mention that Bush and Clinton had tightened and then subsequently relaxed laws to allow for contact. Your section implies that it was the US, or rather the Clinton Administration responsible for this when the source does not and in fact focuses on Cuba's responsibility. It would be like saying "As a result of the Trump administration, millions of families were separated in Syria" which is not the case, no matter what political leaning one has. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:51, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Policies that separate families can be different in how they do it. Whether it's by separating people as they cross borders illegally (in 2018) or by deporting people who had been living here awhile (1997-2000). I'm not sure how it's misleading, "over a million" is a pretty conservative representation of the 1.6 million estimate made by human rights watch. I could change that to "approximately 1.6 million" if that would be less 'emotional'.

The wording of the article is simply describing whose administration the changes happened under. I don't hold Clinton directly responsible for Cuba's policies just as I don't hold Trump responsible for the pre-existing laws which make illegal entry a misdemeanor crime that can result in prison sentences. Clinton choosing to enforce Cuba's wishes and Trump choosing to enforce federal criminal laws do make these policies associated with their administrations, and both policies separated families.

I'm introducing this as a stub, statements about later relaxations which reunited families could be added too. This is an afterthought though, and not the primary topic. The topic of reuniting families could possibly be separate topics:

These could describe what efforts the various administrations have taken to reunite separated families. Given that these would deal not just with families split up by the administration in power at the time, but also those split up by previous administrations, I'm not sure if it should be delegated to a subtopic of "separation" articles. Families separated by a given administration could be reunited either that administration or subsequent ones, so a subsection of "separation" could possibly link to several administrations "reunification" articles. ScratchMarshall (talk) 19:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

My point was that your "stub" draft is misleading and I pointed out specifically why. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

You mentioned, sans parenthesis:

"I think it's misleading as your source here does not state or imply that families were forcefully separated just that a travel restriction/ban prevented return access"

The tentative title is not Clinton administration forceful family separation policy so I'm not sure why "force" comes into it. But pursuing your thought on that...

  • The 2005 HRW article "Torn Apart" and says "policies and regulations that serve to separate families"
  • the 2007 HRW "Forced Apart" says "separated from their parent, husband, or wife because of these deportations".

HRW appears to judge deportation with verbs like tearing/forcing. If someone refuses to be deported (per 1996) and resists, force would be used to make them. If someone refuses to stay in the country and sneaks back to family in Cuba (per 1999) force would be used to bring them back, no? ScratchMarshall (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm really not interested in getting into a debate with you about this. There is a clear NPOV issue here and if you feel my review was wrong, resubmit it and let another reviewer look. Thanks. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Jean-Albert Dadas

Hi! Why do you think he doesn't deserve an article?Contains Sulfites (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

As I explained in my edit summary, it's covered in the target and is not independently notable. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:31, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

I just noticed you deleted ALL my edits of Dromomania, including, for example, that dromomania was introduced in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 2000. Do you even read what you revert? Contains Sulfites (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Also, please take a look at this: fr:Albert Dadas The French clearly believe he's notable. I saw the French page only when I was finishing my own, so I didn't include its references. It seems that, aside from the novel I mentioned on my page, he inspired another novel, a comic book, and an exhibition. If I added that, would it be enough to warrant a page? Contains Sulfites (talk) 19:53, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

There are several issues with your edits, particularly the DSM as the source you used is not reliable and it's not listed anywhere in the DSM Dromomania itself is hardly even notable and lacking in actual reliable sources. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

I found the DSM table of contents. You're right, dromomania isn't listed. I apologize for doubting your thoroughness. I'll resubmit the Dadas article once I've added more artistic references. It would be a shame for such an inspiring person not to have an article, dromomania or no dromomania. Contains Sulfites (talk) 21:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for bothering you again, but I feel I should share this with you. When I Googled the books talking about Dadas, I had the idea of sorting them by date instead of relevance. It turns out that before 1998 (when Ian Hacking published the lectures that would become Mad Travelers, the book I've read), there is absolutely no mention of Dadas for more than a century. Hacking pulled him out of total oblivion. The subsequent articles and novels were inspired by Hacking, not Dadas himself. I fell for it too and wasted an afternoon, then got mad at you. What can I say? Sorry, and I'll definitely vote for the deletion of dromomania. Contains Sulfites (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

My Mathematical Sociology editing

Hello Chrissymad -- Over the past several days I've made many major and minor edits of the Wikipedia entry for Mathematical Sociology. This afternoon I spent hours .. HOURS! -- fixing an "edit conflict" and finally fixed it by the method of copying and pasting on a new tab and then saving. Only minutes later, you seem to have made a decision that the page is problematic and it is back to the really inadequate page I've been correcting for the past several days, often in contact with Piotr (forgot this Wiki name -- if you're knowledgeable about all this maybe you can find it) who has applauded the enormous amount of work I put in. I'm a professional in the very field I am editing but not an expert in editing Wikipedia. Anyway, now all my work is gone! Perhaps you think all those footnoted citations, references and the like don't mean anything? I don't get it. PLEASE do restore the page to my work! Please! SeniorScribbler (talk) 21:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOR. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

ScratchMarshall

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tyciol. Doug Weller talk 16:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 13:49:08, 18 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Niallmcg


Hi Chrissymad. Could you give me some more feedback on this article. Previously you declined this page due to lack of references. Is your current reason for declining still lack of references or does it relate to the language used in the text? Is there anything I can do to salvage this article/make is suitable for publication/approval? Thanks in advance

Niallmcg (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Ryan Serhant Deletions

Hi Chrissymad,

Can you explain the deletions? I was originally "verified" on Wikipedia and have written pages in the past. Although my account is new, I have cited and linked to all of my text on the page like I have done in the past. Do I simply need to wait 4 days for my account to be certified? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelsmcl (talk • contribs) 18:20, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your feedback. I will take it into account in the future. Even after you spend hours reading these Notability guidelines, it's still tough to grasp. I created Forced Alliance after going to Wikipedia: Project Video Games: Requested Articles. Not that it justifies anything but a lot of video game articles only rely on the types of sources I used (see for yourself, Road Runner's Death Valley Rally for instance). AARP source, i know was shaky, I used it as a backup source to another secondary source I used. I mean your allowed to use youtube videos as sources for somethings so I figured that kind of exception to the rule thing would apply to the AARP source too. This site is so uneven/inconsistent with its policies and rules JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reporting user:Meteres. I have Metres as a doppelganger, but there's no point in trying to tie up all the possible misspellings or translations people can come up with. At least Borcker is single-minded in his activities. Meters (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 07:06:39, 21 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Fergalmdaly


Thanks for reviewing Home_Sweet_Tokyo page. This show is notable in that it's possibly the only (or at least a very rare example) of a show starring (and indeed written by) a foreigner on any Japanese TV station. I've added a little bit about that with regard to NHK (their first sitcom and first English language comedy). It's probably also the only English language comedy/drama ever made by a Japanese TV station but I don't have reference for that. Even if it's not the only one then it is one of a tiny few, making it notable.

The the star has also been interview by Wall Street Internaional Magazine about the series, although that being mostly an interview, I don't cite it in the article but have added the external link. Fergalmdaly (talk) 07:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Merges

May I suggest in future instead of being awkward, that you actually help with things like merges?, I clearly stated I was hopeless at merging so instead of being awkward over it you instead should've helped me (or left it for someone else),
The closing admin has never to my knowledge closed any AFD as merge because they believe merges should be discussed on the talkpage ..... The consensus in this case was a clear and obvious merge .... Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Then take it up with the closing admin, please. The only thing that can be said is one sentence as the rest is PR fluff. I was nothing but civil to you, so can you please explain this edit summary? That is also not how merges work because it doesn't include attribution. If you don't know how it works, why mess with it? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Possible RD sock?

Hello Chrissymad, can you please take a look at this user who recreated MD's article Sri Reddy under Sri Reddy Mallidi. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Remove template message from Golden Sheen Sapphire page

Hi Chrissymad, I see you are away from Wikipedia for a while, so I am going to remove the template message from the Golden Sheen Sapphire page. I have done a major edit and added citations for each {citation needed} tag.

Sjwaddington (talk) 05:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Sjwaddington I've restored the previous version as the sources you've added were either too generic (main pages of a magazine?) or refspam (sjwgems.com?!). CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

User:Chrissymad (talk)

Chrissymad Hmm, ok. Well, those magazines are respected industry journals, so what would you suggest would be acceptable as a source? The photos on sjwgems.com is the only reference anywhere that shows the colour change properties of gold sheen sapphire. I am not sure what else I can use - apart from the photo I uploaded to Wiki - which makes it self evident, until you decided it needed an external citation. I would appreciate your suggestion on that too. Thank you. Sjwaddington (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi Chrissymad,

I just wanted to say sorry for what was said yesterday, Angry or not you didn't deserve those words yesterday and so I wanted to sincerely apologise for that,

I look forward to contributing with you :),

Anyway again apologies for yesterday,

Take care, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the apology, means a lot. Sometimes our irritation can get the best of us. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome, Agreed but still no one deserves to be spoken to like that, Anyway apologies again, Right I'll shut up now lol, Take care, –Davey2010Talk 15:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Kaihan Krippendorff page reworked

Hi @Chrissymad

Thank you for taking the time to review the previous version of the page I created. I went through and examined each source, pulling those you said were not ok to use.

Can you please let me know what you think of the article in its current form? Any other recommendations and assistance would be appreciated as well.

Best,

Slotmachiner--Slotmachiner (talk) 22:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Praxidicae, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Redirect to Darren Wang

Dear Chrissymad: Just notice that you redirected "Wang Talu" to "Darren Wang". The reason I removed the "redirection" at "Wang Talu" is that the English name of this actor has been "Wang Talu" since 2016. The English name of his latest works is "Wang Talu", no more "Darren Wang". Please watch the trailers and posters of his latest works, like "Suddenly Seventeen", "Legend of the Naga Pearls", "A Better Tomorrow 2018" and "The Wolf". (Redacted) Please let me know what you think! Thank you very much! -Doedoeneoneo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Doedoeneoneo Please discuss it on the talk page until consensus is reached - also please do not provide anyone's personal information on Wikipedia. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
@Chrissymad: Good morning! Thanks for your reply. Let me remove my previous message first. He has his English name as "Wang Talu" since 2016. Here are more information for you reference. Thank you very much!
1. Instagram => @taluwang
2. 2016 movie "Suddenly Seventeen" => Poster
3. 2017 movie "Legend of the Naga Pearls" => Trailer
4. 2018 movie "A Better Tomorrow 2018" => Poster
5. 2018 drama "The Wolf" => Trailer
-Doedoeneoneo (talk)
@Chrissymad: Dear, I am not able to wait for you. Please contact me first if you think it is not OK to have "Wang Talu" wiki . We could discuss it more when you have time. Also, it will be nice that you could help "redirect" "Darren Wang" to "Wang Talu". Thank you very much!

AfC notification: Draft:Dwight Watkins has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dwight Watkins. Thanks! Sam Sailor 05:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

Kevin submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Since joining Wikipedia just over two years ago, Editor Chrissymad has become integral to the maintenance of this project. She is a prolific vandalism patroller, with over 12600 vandalism reverts, reports, and warnings. She is also an excellent reviewer at AfC, which no sane human would want to touch with a ten-foot pole. Her dedicated work helps make Wikipedia the place that it is, and those are some of the many reasons that it gives me great pleasure to nominate Chrissymad to be Editor of the Week.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: 

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Icosahedron
Chrissymad
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning June 29, 2018
This two-year veteran is an integral part toward maintaining this project. A prolific vandalism patroller with over 12600 vandalism reverts, reports, and warnings and an excellent reviewer at AfC.
Recognized for
Dedicated work effort
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 13:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations, Chrissy!! Thanks for all your work! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks so much L235, Buster7! This was wonderful to return to after vacation! . CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Congratulations from me too! Alarichall (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Congrats from me as well C. Thanks so much for all you do here at the 'pedia. MarnetteD|Talk 23:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hedvig Hricak

Hi Chrissy, hope you're well. Thanks again for your previous help with Hricak's BLP. I was hoping you could help me with some new revisions, which I proposed on the talk page without any response. I've been working on improving the current version of the article to something a little more robust, with some of Hricak's personal information removed (as it had been previously suppressed for privacy reasons), and some information on her research included in a separate section. I also created separate sections for her other roles, past roles, and accolades. If you have the time, could you take a look? I have a draft here. I want to make sure that what I'm proposing is in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I'd really appreciate it!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 00:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae/Archive_10&oldid=862023826"