Jump to content

User talk:PrathuCoder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, PrathuCoder, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thabo Makhetha-Kwinana (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PrathuCoder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Corey (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of fictional dogs in video games has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of fictional dogs in video games was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://thelastofus.fandom.com/wiki/Alice, https://okami.fandom.com/wiki/Amaterasu, https://finalfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Sant'_Angelo_di_Roma) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Chlidonophoridae. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chlidonophora chuni has been accepted

[edit]
Chlidonophora chuni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valorant

[edit]

Hi PrathuCoder,

I appreciate you taking the time to edit Wikipedia, but this is not helping. Concerning your edits on Valorant, please take a moment to read Wikipedia's guidelines on video game articles, see WP:VG/MOS.

  • We don't add an in-text link to a website for people to download the game.
  • You've linked the characters. None of these exist yet. Maybe create them before creating so many redlinks?
  • I don't think in-game game modes deserve their own article at all
  • We don't use "you" in articles, see WP:YOU ("Radianite Points are another in-game currency which allows you to upgrade animation levels or get extra colors for a skin. You need not pay money to get it, It comes from agent contracts.")
  • Lore is written from an in-universe point of view and is WP:PRIMARY sourced

soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Soetermans Ok and thanks for correcting my edits. I'm new on wikipedia and I have unfortunately missed out on these things. But I think that red links make other wikipedians know that there are no articles and they can help create them. Also, as you said, lore is primary sourced but it is published by the official site itself. I didn't add theories but fundamental things that are approved by everyone. This makes something encyclopedic and I thought it can be added. PrathuCoder (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi PrathuCoder, thank you for understanding and welcome to Wikipedia! Please, don't let my critical tone scare you off! You're very right, a WP:REDLINK doesn't necessarily have to be avoided in articles, if there's a possible article on the subject.
I'm not familiar with Valorant, but instead of having separate articles on the characters, maybe a List of Valorant characters is an option? We do need good coverage on them, separate from the game itself (see [[WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:SIGCOV), because I've nominated a bunch of those through the years (see Ratchet & Clank characters, playable characters in WWF/E, Diablo, Spyro or Rampage.
Concerning game modes, if they just appear in one game, my guess is that won't ever be notable. However, certain game modes found in many games do have their own articles, like deathmatch or Last man standing (video games).
Again, welcome to Wikipedia. I see you've already received praise for editing articles on biology-related stuff, so great job. If you have any question, feel free to ask. I'll try to check your talk page, otherwise you can use the templae {{reply|'username here'}}, and I'll get a notification (or another user will of course too). Kind regards, and happy editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I wasn't totally scared of your critical tone but thanks for understanding me too. Agents in valorant have a bunch of abilities (4 to be exact) and they need to be explained (You're not familiar with it so go to the official site and see a couple of agents and you'll get it). And wikipedia always likes to use summary style so this is obviously the better option than making one huge gigantic article. This will take time but who cares (It has so many reliable sources to make it faster)? But could you speak a little bit about the lore part? (Its primary sourced but its accepted and official, thus encyclopedic (but debatable), (Maybe fandom is better for it?)). The game modes could be made one article (A middle between over-summary-style and one huge long intricate article) but if I get large amounts of information I could make them separate.
Note I haven't linked or formatted anything except the official site because you're an experienced wikipedian and I hope you can understand it and because I don't think the talk is important to be of good quality but the articles. PrathuCoder (talk) 15:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Soetermans: I would like to be keen to make sure my articles to this topic are not something fan related (Like lore theories or something opinion based). I wouldn't like to be a burden to you but If you could help me it could be great for creating articles for agents. But this article is actually quite suited for fandom more than wikipedia but keeping it encyclopedic would avoid deletion. (It has not happened to the main Valorant article so I think I'm on the safe side). PrathuCoder (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Chlidonophora incerta and others

[edit]

I like your work on biological taxa, like Chlidonophora incerta! My only complaint is that some of the typographical formatting doesn't quite follow our manual of style, specifically MOS:SCIENTIFIC and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Organisms. If you take a moment to peruse these guidelines, I'm sure your future articles will be even better! Cheers! —Wasell(T) 🌻🇺🇦 11:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wasell thanks for informing me. I' getting better at this (See the difference between Chlidonophoridae and Chlidonophora incerta). I'm still a new wikipedian and I'm all ears for information from others like you. This was something very important and I thought every taxon has to be italicized. But, do I need to italicize the titles for taxa above genus like family? Also, does taxa above genus mean family and onward or does it also include supergenus and subfamily? PrathuCoder (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Please don't link words that most English speakers know such as "Germany" "American", "album", etc. See wp:OVERLINK. Also, linking a word to the same article, "Proadiantus" results in the word being bolded, but not linked. Such links are not good practice. See wp:linking. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 13:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the revertion of incorrect linking. But in pages like Proadiantus, I want `Proadiantus' bolded everywhere, so I linked it. Many others use this and none debate about it. Yet, thanks for the information as I am quite a new wikipedian. PrathuCoder (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quit doing that. See MOS:BOLD. —Wasell(T) 🌻🇺🇦 18:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of box office records set by Kantara

[edit]
Notice

The article List of box office records set by Kantara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be many news articles talking about how Kantara sets a bunch of records in depth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 14:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deslongchampsithyris has been accepted

[edit]
Deslongchampsithyris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SeoR (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chlidonophorinae (January 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Likely notable, but relies on a single source throughout, and citations are unclear (please cite inline, not in headings).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your edits

[edit]

Hi can you please add citations to your recent edit to the article Life?

If you mostly copy/pasted from the main articles, then you can use the citations from those articles as a start.

Cheers, The void century (talk) 17:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for the info but my edit was reverted. Should I apply the same changes with citations? PrathuCoder (talk) 12:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chlidonophorinae

[edit]

Information icon Hello, PrathuCoder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chlidonophorinae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Ampulicidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sessile. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Megaphragma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Undulate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PrathuCoder&oldid=1204864307"