User talk:Ponia.sp

Ponia.sp, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ponia.sp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Suraj Mal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Suraj Mal was changed by Ponia.sp (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906764 on 2018-05-11T11:57:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Khatris have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The material you added to Suraj Mal was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to India, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sinsinwar Dynasty moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sinsinwar Dynasty, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sheldybett (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jangladesh (region) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jangladesh (region), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. Sources need to contain enough information for verifiability. See WP:CITE. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hari Singh Nalwa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 14:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you to continue to add bogus sources, as you did here, you will end up getting blocked. Wikipedia is not a place to glorify or defame castes. Please go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already. utcursch | talk 14:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source materials do mention community names

https://ibb.co/cg5TYYp

here,a screenshot from A.H Bingle handbook on rajputs pg154 you can check yourself ..and preview for MS Naravane book is available on Google. Mufasa19995 (talk) 04:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ranjit Singh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please use the talk page to contest any sourced content. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kalsia. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 15:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Saunkh. Please note that caste propaganda books such as "Tomar Jat Rulers of North India" or "Jat History" by Thakur Deshraj are not reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. utcursch | talk 15:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jangladesh (region) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jangladesh (region), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits like this one where you removed a large amount of sourced content with the misleading edit summary "Fixed Typoo", despite being given several earlier warnings about removal of sourced content and addition of poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 17:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Caste system in India, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Bharatpur State, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When your block expires in May, I suggest using the talk page before repeating the same edits that keep getting you blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hii poonia jat

Hello jaat bhai Sunny bharat (talk) 08:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello brother Ponia.sp (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhai ji Jato ki bahut glt jaankari de rkhi hai wikipedia pr Sunny 08:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Jat people wikipedia page ko edit karwao Usme bhi galt jankari de rkhi hai Sunny 08:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny bharat (talk • contribs)

Brother try krte he. Facebook pr Ho? Ponia.sp (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Bharatpur State, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alivardi (talk) 15:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I never blanked page. I only removed loosely sourced content. Let me give you a warning I know everything you are doing here on Wikipedia.Stop pushing your propaganda. Ponia.sp (talk) 21:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 23:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (again — too many chances squandered).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 07:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ponia.sp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a unbiased content writer.I just edit pages with giving proper citation which are deleted by Alivardi who have also blocked me Ponia.sp (talk) 15:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is not all you do. For example, what about this edit, where you remove cited information? Yamla (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Jangladesh (region)

Hello, Ponia.sp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jangladesh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]