User talk:Pmt7ar

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[1]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Alex79818 (talk) 23:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

March 2010

I'm sure I won't have to template you with a bog standard 3RR notice but if you insist on persisting to edit war POV changes into the Falkland Islands I will be forced to report you on the 3RR noticeboard. Please cease and desist, you know better. Justin the Evil Scotman talk 15:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

They where actually 2 reverts, the first edit was to correct an inaccuracy with the referenced source and to maintain the consistency throughout the article. It was not a POV change. I though you only reverted the poll issue as your summary, so I restored manually the other changes, I didn't thought you actually meant reverting both changes. You fail to assume good faith. pmt7ar ^(t|c) 05:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Just for future reference, when you take things to an outside noticeboard (such as the reliable sources noticeboard) it is considered appropriate to leave a message on the article talk page concerned. I have made a note of your taking the FI dispute to the reliable sources board on Talk:Falkland Islands. Pfainuk talk 21:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I will do it when its necessary. I wanted a second opinion from the start, without having intentions on the contents, only if it complies with the usage as per guidelines as reliable sources. I'm afraid -and wasn't wrong- that Justin would disrupt with a content analysis. I don't want to distract the attention of wherever the Argentine law has the right or not to say what it says, I want to know if the sources are usable to state the Argentine law position. I hope you understand that. pmt7ar ^(talk) 01:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Disrupt? I suggest you stop with the constant bad faith accusations and the community is entitled to have all relevant informaiton when it makes a comment. Also its clear from the talk page you insist on a single source only and not all relevant opinions. Justin the Evil Scotsman talk 11:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Malvinas

Muy buena y fuerte tu posición. :) Alakasam 13:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Coincido con Alakasam! and indeed dear Pmt7ar I enjoyed your contributions, those cuckolds justin and the other fagot always act jointly, come to me whether are needing for help. Have a nice day. Carau 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:AnotherCode-Screenshot1.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AnotherCode-Screenshot1.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Done. pmt7ar ^(talk) 20:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Me ganaste!

Por unos minutos en incluir a Argentina! hehe It only took you 9 minutes! congrats! Pero creo que la presidente todavía tiene que firmar la ley... Againme (talk) 07:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Cierto, pero la presidente ya anunció su apoyo, lo usó como bandera, así que es casi seguro ^^. pmt7ar ^(talk) 07:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

We should reorganise Same-sex marriage Latin American section to show in its heading that Argentina is the only country in the region with federal S-SM. Againme (talk) 07:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I thought it would be better to wait and let others to do it, it has just been 20 mins ago. We should wait for reliable sources to appear so we can update the articles. pmt7ar ^(talk) 07:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Opinion

Hi. Could you add your opinion? [2] Regards Ron 1987 16:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Falkland Islands Article in Arbitration

Having briefly reviewed the article's discussion history, I've identified you as a potentially aggrieved editor whose contributions may have been negatively impacted by the actions of a group of editors who are alleged to be POV-pushing and engaging in WP:GAMES. I invite you to peruse the arbcom request and voice your opinion and experiences, at your leisure. The link is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#WP:NPOV_and_WP:GAMES_in_.22Falkland_Islands.22_and_related_articles

Thank you.Alex79818 (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Consider this my notice I will make no further reverts but if you were to remove cited content for a fourth time, I will report you for edit warring. Wee Curry Monster talk 16:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

If I misunderstood your position, my apologies and I have no problem with your strikethrough. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 22:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

If I may observe, you were in the wrong by altering Keysangers edits, this separated his signature from his comment. I would suggest you move your comment if you're intent on restoring it. BTW this is in WP:TPNO, the very guideline you quoted at Keysanger, specifically Generally, do not alter others' comments, including signatures.. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 21:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Tagging

So do you intend to get off your backside and start providing cites for uncontroversial information? Or do you expect someone else to do it? Wee Curry Monster talk 23:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

I just noticed through your revert that the Argentine section has everything cited. 10 footnotes for 7 sentences. UK supporters section heavily lacks referencing. 11 sentences and just 3 are referenced. It doesn't matter if its controversial or not, the section lacks referencing. I don't intend to do it myself, that's the meaning of the template, leave it there so someday someone does it. Or we could add a template like {{Refimprove}} to the subsection. pmt7ar ^(talk) 23:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

So basically you make work for other people to do, demanding that others provide cites for uncontroversial facts but you yourself can't be arsed to do the work. See WP:SOFIXIT, if you feel it needs doing, do it yourself. Wee Curry Monster talk 23:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Exactly. WP:BOLD it's intended to promote collaboration. I don't have the obligation to do it myself. There are things I can edit myself and things I can't or simply don't want to. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, tagging and letting others know where an improvement can be made its also a form of collaboration. Do you intend that everyone that uses {{fact}} fills it themselves? I just saw that a tag there would be better to the article, so I kept the tags of the IP user. pmt7ar ^(talk) 23:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Thats a cop out, I would only ever use a tag if I couldn't find that information for myself. I don't make unnecessary work for others, that I don't see as collaborative. Wee Curry Monster talk 23:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedia Stories Project

Aloha!

My name is Victor and I work with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. We're chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade new people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I find stories that drive our annual fundraising efforts. It's important to convey the incredible diversity of people who've come to rely upon Wikipedia every day.

I'd really like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia.

I will be in Buenos Aires from the 10th - 11th of March 2012.

I'm hoping you will elaborate on your story with me. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project!

Thank you,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012 - Another (novel)

Hi! Quick question regarding Naoya: wouldn't not explaining the situation to Koichi be considered a class rule? I just want to get across the idea that Naoya is torn between telling Koichi and following the rest of the class, basically. I find the anime is a bit unclear as to what the class rules actually are so I may have misunderstood. Juniper4589 (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary! It's the total opposite, Teshigawara was dying to tell him, the entire class wanted him -or anyone- to tell him. It was not a secret at all, he's a member of class 3-3 and must know the situation (since everyone wants him to follow the rules, but if he doesn't know them...). What happened is that Teshigawara is quite a coward and missed most chances to explain him, and in the school he is limited since can't explain it without noticing Mei, so he wants, but cant.

In ep2, that moment in the library, Teshigawara wanted to explain, but Mochidzuki stopped him thinking it was "already" late (it's a small hint given by japanese grammar). Its more a japanese thing, to start with the word "rule" is not quite accurate. The word "rule" means really "play", "acting", "do the same as the entire class". More literally, "follow the decision of the class". The "decision" being "to ignore X", so he is ought to follow that. pmt7ar ^(talk) 17:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I see what you mean. My understanding is that it feels like the class wants to tell Koichi the truth but are afraid of the consequences. In that library example, Teshigawara says the class is cursed by accident; you can tell he didn't mean to say that out loud even though he does want to explain what he meant afterwards. I just want to portray that tension of wanting to tell the truth but being scared and I feel the current formulation doesn't do that. So how about we change it to 'he wants to explain the situation to Koichi but is afraid of the consequences'? Juniper4589 (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

In the way it was portrayed before, it made me think that the 3-3 was meant to be kept a secret from Kouichi and he was trying to tell him (because of friendship?), but that was false, so I removed it. The truth is that he was ordered to explain him but he is very coward to fulfill it (not of the consequences, since telling him would have prevented all of them). pmt7ar ^(talk) 19:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

That's what I mean by consequences; I don't specifically mean the curse, I mean he's afraid of what will happen in general. Obviously if he'd just come out with it they potentially could have avoided much of the drama :) I'll make the change then! Thanks for clarifying! Juniper4589 (talk) 21:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quick question: can we just take out Ryohei and Tamie? I mean, their presence on the page really doesn't add anything. We can just edit Ritstuko and Koichi's summary to mention them instead... Or maybe combine them as a single entry. What do you think? Also, small detail: it wasn't my edit you reverted, it was Chihiro2501's. I'm not the only one making changes on the page... :) Just pointing it out since you attributed another edit to me a few days ago which I had nothing to do with. Juniper4589 (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries ain't PM. I didn't attribute any message to you. It was just the summary, the reason of my edit. BTW I reverted TO your version, not YOUR edit. By reverting to your version I removed the two edits of Chihiro2501.pmt7ar ^(talk) 13:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I know edit summaries aren't PMs - it wasn't addressed to me but it did mention me (or my edits as it is). I just misread it and thought you were reverting my edits and then got confused when I saw it wasn't one of mine. Thanks for editing Ryohei and Tamie out! Juniper4589 (talk) 14:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Terragno

Hi Pmt7ar! I remember we once had a tedious and unfruitful discussion regarding Argentinean citizenship and Malvinas inhabitants (you warned me about the outcome and I wouldn't listen --sorry for that). I've found another 'proyecto de decalaración' by Rodolfo Terragno wich has a superb Annex. I thought you may enjoy it too: Proyecto Nacionalidad Malvinas. It seems it was passed.

Un abrazo,

Langus (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

That's a looong annex. If I recall correctly, the problem with that bill is that other editors interpreted it as an official stance, being just a bill, and dismissed; plus some differences because of the language barrier. Is there anything specific you want me to look or you want to use in the articles?

PS: It's a "proyecto de resolución". I don't know exactly how those things works, I know the senate only can debate bills and create laws, and "propose" "resolutions" or "declarations" to the executive branch. In this case, it was approved to propose the executive branch (ministry of foreign affairs) to analyze the topic and make a resolution. The terms are somehow explained here: [3]. And this project entry and its status (passed) if needed is here: [4]. pmt7ar ^(talk) 05:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

You're right, I got that wrong, I guess I wasn't paying attention when I wrote that.

Nothing in particular, I just wanted to share a good source :)

Saludos! --Langus (talk) 10:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Glaxal

lol, sorry for the confusion. But I see you emphasize the details though so that's fine. "Express" means to express the characters feelings and that's how I put the wrong word lol sorry. "Emphasize" means to hightlight the word even a character to make a point out of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glaxal (talk • contribs) 16:23, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Pmt7ar. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yui Ogura

The article Yui Ogura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP article relying entirely on primary sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nouniquenames 18:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Yui Ogura for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yui Ogura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yui Ogura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nouniquenames 14:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:LovePlus+ cover.png)

Thanks for uploading File:LovePlus+ cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NewLovePlus cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:NewLovePlus cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

hello

Hi - I just joined the WikiProject group related to the South Atlantic islands and thought I would introduce myself to other editors. I look forward to collaborating with you in the future to help improve these articles to most accurately reflect the international consensus position. BlueSalix (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Editorial Ivrea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nabi and Tachibana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pmt7ar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)