User talk:Plad02

Welcome!

Hello, Plad02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Finding Dory. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MeowMoon (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox

Hi. You included in your sandbox a very comprehensive multi-db tag. That listed it for speedy deletion; in particular, it put it in the high-priority queue for deletion as an attack page. I am guessing that the tag was there as an experiment rather than because you really wanted the page deleted, so I have commented out the db tag by enclosing it in  markers. If you really want the page deleted, you can just take them off, or it might be better to put {{db-u1}} at the top, so that the next patrolling admin is not in doubt about what you want. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:ClueBot_Commons/Praise— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 20:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Not sure what the point is of all the templates in your sandbox, but it will be deleted sooner or later. If you are just testing editing functions, it is generally considered polite to remove the templates once you are done. Safiel (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason I feel like transcluding every page in a deletion or block template. This is not a hoax; it's a test edit. What I transclude in these templates are user pages, MediaWiki messages, help pages, and other namespace pages. I might get obsessive with this. Plad02 (leave me a message) 03:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I don't like having my userpage in your sandbox. You'd better blank it yourself before it gets deleted. Bishonen | talk 10:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

CSD tagged user pages

Your CSD tagging of the user pages for D (talk · contribs) and Mateapokaiwhenuakitanatahu (talk · contribs) was incorrect. You tagged them both for vandalism and for being an attack page. Neither of these are correct. You may not agree with the statements on the user page, but they do not attack an particular person or entity. Additionally, you tagged D (talk · contribs) as being blanked by the editor and this is clearly not true. Please be more careful in your speedy deletion tagging. Thank you. - -Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave User:Mateapokaiwhenuakitanatahu's user page alone. Your last edit was again incorrect. It it not a hoax page. If you continue incorrectly tag user pages, this can be considered vandalism and you will be blocked. Additionally, do not make any more edits to User:Mateapokaiwhenuakitanatahu. If you do so, I will block you from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I told you to stay way from User:Mateapokaiwhenuakitanatahu's user page, but you did not do so, therefore, just as I said would happen, you have now been blocked from editing. If you return from the block and make any more incorrect speedy deletion requests, you may find yourself blocked indefinitely. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious from the contributions that this is not a new user. According to DeltaQuad it's

Likely User:William Pina based on CheckUser evidence. That would correspond to the behavioural evidence, I'd say. I have blocked the account indefinitely. Huon (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm this is the finding of CU. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-x1

Template:Db-x1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Safiel (talk) 02:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-x2

Template:Db-x2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Safiel (talk) 02:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Plad02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I kept creating sock accounts because I've never gotten a chance to edit Wikipedia again. For my original account William Pina (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log), I first made attempts to edit a page. Second, I created uncommon redirects. Third, I uploaded non-free content to Commons. And finally, I suddenly became disruptive. Behalf of that, it got worse, where I added deletion templates that do not meet the CSD. I've been trying my best to avoid further disruption to Wikipedia, but wasn't listening. I tried to appeal the block for my original account via the UTRS, but declined because they think I'm a suspected sock puppet or a sock puppeteer. For much consequenes, I just can't stop the socking. I've trying my best to avoid the socking, but wasn't listening. Thus, it's been over a year since I became calm now. Do these sanctions ever affect my editing experience? Well, the answer is "yes". If I'm unblocked, I'll find that I'm still blocked due to a "hard IP range block". The IP range must get unblocked in order to edit with an account. I'll show you what it means when contributing constructively. Plad02 (leave me a message) 21:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still need to go back to your original account and request unblock there, using WP:UTRS again if necessary. If that is refused, then further socking is not an acceptable alternative. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Plad02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16995 was submitted on Nov 26, 2016 21:42:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-x2

Template:Db-x2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-x1

Template:Db-x1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. House Blaster^talk 03:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]