User talk:Pk5abi

Welcome!

Hello, Pk5abi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 11:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Punjabi language, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 03:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Punjabi language. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 11:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Raja Sajjawal Khan

A tag has been placed on Raja Sajjawal Khan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Huadpe (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raja Muhammad Ashraf Khan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Raja Muhammad Ashraf Khan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Flying Toaster 07:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raja Muhammad Nazar Khan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Raja Muhammad Nazar Khan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of notability (please provide a reference - for instance officer of what?)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Flying Toaster 07:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rai Bashir Khan Bhatti

A tag has been placed on Rai Bashir Khan Bhatti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rtphokie (talk) 14:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Short, unreferenced articles

Hello! Your contributions are more than welcome, but you should consider first reading WP:YFA and WP:STUB before continuing. These sorts of very short, hard-to-understand articles make a lot of work for other editors. Thanks again for your help and I look forward to seeing the improvements you'll make to future contributions. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punjab Rajputs

Hi.

I have editted some of this page. I hope you do not take offence, but it needs to be more encyclopedic.I have Rose's Glossary of tribes which also gives some background info on the Rajputs in Punjab, and I will add an intro paragraph. Secondly, I have added 1911 census information on the location of various Rajput clans. Thirdly an India contributor has correctly raised the point the not all Punjab Rajputs are Muslim, and I have asked him to add a para or two on those living in East Punjab.

WALTHAM2--WALTHAM2 (talk) 03:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Collaborations-2-350x248.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Collaborations-2-350x248.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 05:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Desi ji

The article Desi ji has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Desi ji

A tag has been placed on Desi ji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punjabi language

Please don't keep adding Pakistan to the list of nations that have Punjabi as an official language. Urdu is the only official language of Pakistan -- if you believe otherwise, please provide a citation. Pakistan is already mentioned in the "states" attribute. Also "World Punjabi Congress" is not an official regulatory body, so it should not be mentioned in the "agency" field. utcursch | talk 15:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mc Lazarus

A tag has been placed on Mc Lazarus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 12:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Jat

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Muslim Jat, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of Jat clans of West Punjab. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, after investigating the above bot report, I redirected Muslim Jat to List of Jat clans of West Punjab, of which this one is a duplicate. Please note that in order to preserve the rights of the various contributors of List of Jat clans of West Punjab, you cannot copy / paste the content of their past efforts into a new renamed article. If I may offer a suggestion, either add your modifications to the source article directly, or, in case you believe Muslim Jat to be a better name for the article, propose a page move at Talk:List of Jat clans of West Punjab. Regards,

MLauba (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Begum Iffat Liaqaat Ali Khan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Begum Iffat Liaqaat Ali Khan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability is unclear, and I cannot verify it by my searches.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fences&Windows 03:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Vandalising you will be reported and your I.P blocked

I see many pages where your edits show huge Bias towards Islam ,i am going to report you and get you blocked due to your editting without reason and removing referenced material to show somebody is not a Muslim , Now please quit whilst your ahead because they will get reverted by me or someone else ,please stop your edits make no sense and you are not giving any reason for your edits Information-Line (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop This Edit War

I am appealing to you and Information-Line (who I have warned), please stop this edit war you both have started. Either one of you or both will end up blocked. Also do not add secions to articles unless you have references to back them up. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 10:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK so you wish to persist. Don't say I didn't warn you. Thanks--Sikh-history (talk) 13:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel

That user Sikh History is vandalising articles without proper discussion, do report to admin, thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.171 (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Cross recipient article

Hello Pk5abi, thank you for your recent contribution to the military history project. Could you please add some more details to the article you created on Raja Saadat Khan? Currently there are no details such as the action in which the subject performed the acts that lead to his award, what unit he was serving in and when and where it occured. Also, while there are some general references listed, could you please try to add some specific citations, e.g. page numbers of books where the subject is discussed, to assist in the verification process? Some biographical details would be great too, if possible (for example exact date of birth and place of birth, date of death, etc.). These details are needed to verify the subject, as currently the name does not appear on the List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Indian Army and thus needs to be confirmed. Your assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated. I have left more comments on the article's talk page. Could you please take a look and address the issues listed? Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 15:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VC recipients

Hello Pk5abi, can you please explain the history around Yar Mohammad Khan and Raja Saadat Khan. I have checked an index of VC recipients by Max Arthur and these two are not mentioned, nor are they found in a search of the London Gazette. Are these alternative names for the individuals? Otherwise they seem to be hoaxes in which case they will be nominated for deletion. Regards, Woody (talk) 18:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for deletion

I have nominated Raja Saadat Khan, and Yar Mohammad Khan for deletion. I do not think that these articles satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Saadat Khan and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yar Mohammad Khan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woody (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punjabi language

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Punjabi language. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please at least provide an edit summary or leave a note on the talk page before reverting the other user's edits. utcursch | talk 19:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pk5abi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

M.A. Rasheed - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --Charles (talk) 08:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rai Hussain Khan Bhatti

The article Rai Hussain Khan Bhatti has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Salih (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes to sourced statistics

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Karachi. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 14:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletions at Muslim Rajputs

I noticed you deleted a large paragraph of cited text at Muslim Rajput, which appeared to be POV eliminations to indicate that Muslims cannot be Rajputs. Do not remove cited text without replacing it with a better reference, and a reference to Rajputs in general while specifically avoiding the Muslim designation, as you did here [1] is not constructive. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rana Muhammad Hayat Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rana Muhammad Hayat Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 05:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chaudhry Ameer Khan

The article Chaudhry Ameer Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find sources to verify the existence of article subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 18:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rai RehamatKhan Bhatti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rai RehamatKhan Bhatti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rai RehamatKhan Bhatti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 00:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rai Bhoe Bhatti

The article Rai Bhoe Bhatti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He existed but seems not to meet WP:GNG - GBooks/GSearch reveal little but mirrors and blogs etc

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAK

_{Welcome!
Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) lTopGunl (talk) 06:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around!
v
t
e
Links for Wikipedians interested in Pakistan
WP:Pakistan
Notice board
Discussion board
Recognized content
Deletion talks
Departments
Pakistan Portal
Collaborations
Pakistan stubs
Pakistani Wikipedians by number of edits
Userboxes
Outline of Pakistan
WikiProjects
Provinces
Balochistan
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Sindh
Punjab
Regions
Pakistan
Districts
Cities
Karachi
Arts & Sports
Cinema
Pakistan Super League
Transport
Railways
Aviation
Country
History
Military history
Politics
Others
Islam
Indian and Pakistani cooperation
Language
WikiProject Urdu
Urdu Intertranswiki

lTopGunl (talk) 06:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]}

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Muslim Rajputs. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Muslim Rajputs. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The changes you have made to this article have been reverted with an explanation of why. If you wish to re-add them, you must now discuss them on the article Talk page first, explain why the given reason for their removal was invalid, and gain a consensus supporting the changes you wish to make. Please be aware that edit-warring to re- add the changes is likely to get you blocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karachi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Lone boatman (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jamwal

You removed a valid maintenance template at Jamwal, inserted an unsourced infobox and completely changed the singe sentence of the article without providing a source. None of this was appropriate and I have reverted you. Please could you take a read of our policy concerning verifiability. - Sitush (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reverted you at Punjab region, where you removed a source and adjusted statements without providing either a reason for doing so or verification of your changes. - Sitush (talk) 17:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Multan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saraiki and Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imran Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Join us at FB

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ^{( T - C - G )} 06:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Karachi. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 08:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

Look, I'm not messing about here because it is obvious that you have seen past edit summaries etc on Meenas. Will you please take note of the warning above and if you really believe that your numerous changes are justified then feel free to explain at Talk:Meenas why such unsourced, poorly sourced and glorifying content should be reinstated to the article. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 13:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jangnama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jangnama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jangnama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ~ satellizer ~~ talk ~ 07:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imran Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Arab Emirates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chaudhry Chaku Khan

The article Chaudhry Chaku Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No sources at GBooks or GWeb other than mirrors. Unsourced here for years and nothing at Chakwal either. A minor clan chieftain.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 12:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan

Hi Pk5abi!

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan[reply]

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive

Hi Pk5abi!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saraiki. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Punjabi Muslims

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Punjabi Muslims, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.writeopinions.com/punjabi-people.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Punjab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Islam in Punjab

added links pointing to Rai, Khan, Kashmiri, Rao, Gondal and Uppal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Rajputs and sanctions

You are already on notice regarding the discretionary sanctions that are in force for articles such as Muslim Rajputs. In addition, your general history here has been pretty poor. I suggest that you take a good read of WP:BLP, WP:BRD and WP:EW and then discuss your proposed changes at the article talk page. - Sitush (talk) 13:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raja Allahdad Khan

The article Raja Allahdad Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is completely unsourced, walls of text, and in very poor english. Impossible to clean up without refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scr★pIron^IV 15:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Raja Allahdad Khan

Hello, Pk5abi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Raja Allahdad Khan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Allahdad Khan .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lara Dutta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahid Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kethwal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nohri

The article Nohri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pk5abi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pk5abi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ranjit Singh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 01:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chaudhry Aurangzeb Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaudhry Aurangzeb Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudhry Aurangzeb Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Urdu people" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Urdu people. Since you had some involvement with the Urdu people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Uanfala (talk) 12:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sodha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sodha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sodha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Heba Aisha (talk) 14:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Urdu-speaking people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 03:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chaudhry Aurangzeb Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaudhry Aurangzeb Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudhry Aurangzeb Khan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User4edits (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]