User talk:PigeonChickenFish/Archives/2021/June

This is an archive of past discussions with User:PigeonChickenFish. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Edit summaries

Hello. Don't forget to add WP:Edit summaries when you edit an article. It was hard to discern what you were doing at California Labor School because there were no summaries. Thanks for all your work! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@BeenAroundAWhile: Hi! Thanks for the note. Sorry about that, I will try to be sure to add notes to the summaries in the future. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maija Peeples-Bright (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

still not clear that they pass WP:NARTIST

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maija Peeples-Bright and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maija Peeples-Bright, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, PigeonChickenFish! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Maija Peeples-Bright has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maija Peeples-Bright. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maija Peeples-Bright has been accepted

Maija Peeples-Bright, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Levi Jordan Plantation State Historic Site

I saw your work at Levi Jordan Plantation State Historic Site. Very well done, thank you! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

@78.26: Thanks! I appreciate the nice note. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, PigeonChickenFish, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already been helping us along with our coverage of jewelers. As you are interested in history, you will no doubt be able to participate in many of our future events. If you haven't already done do, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

@Ipigott: thank you for the nice welcome. I am looking forward to helping more in the future. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 13:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)