User talk:Pichpich/Archive-2020

Archives

Talk page threads of 2008-2009
Talk page threads of 2010
Talk page threads of 2011
Talk page threads of 2012
Talk page threads of 2013
Talk page threads of 2014
Talk page threads of 2015
Talk page threads of 2016
Talk page threads of 2017
Talk page threads of 2018
Talk page threads of 2019
Talk page threads of 2020
Talk page threads of 2021
Talk page threads of 2022
Talk page threads of 2023

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Pichpich,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of DXDD-FM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXDD-FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXDD-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agriculture in Sudan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mechanized, Barrage and Cultivation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1782 in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:1782 in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1783 in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:1783 in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1785 in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:1785 in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1786 in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:1786 in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1787 in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:1787 in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1788 in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:1788 in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:186.96.116.138 and their unsourced additions

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:186.96.116.138 and their unsourced additions. I see you're not the only one that noticed this IP's persistent behavior. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Paintings by Jules-Claude Ziegler

A tag has been placed on Category:Paintings by Jules-Claude Ziegler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1681 paintings

A tag has been placed on Category:1681 paintings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marshall294 posted this on the user page

I am a new contributor in Wikipedia, this is my first page creation. I am trying to link all the articles in Clary Kurs wiki page. the page should not be nominated for deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshall294 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marshall294: The problem is that none of your references provide in-depth coverage of the subject in reliable sources. At this stage, I'm not convinced that you can salvage this since Kurs has not played in what we consider fully professional leagues. Best, Pichpich (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

my recent updates shows that Kurs has played in a professional leagues — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshall294 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marshall294: Not in fully professional leagues though. Note that his stint in Turku is, from what I understand, with FC Inter Turku 2 which plays in the third division. You can try to make your case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clary Kurs but you'll need to convince people that he meets the notability requirements. Pichpich (talk) 22:26, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But 1.liga is a notable professional football league. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshall294 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC) The Latvian First League (Latvian: Latvijas Pirmā līga, 1. līga) is the second tier of football in Latvia and is organised by the Latvian Football Federation. The league is also known as the Komanda.lv First League (Komanda.lv 1. līga)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Utopes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mary Jane Peabody, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I was draftifying the article and I marked it as unreviewed before I did so, even though the notability tag was present. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proposed energy infrastructure in Indonesia

A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed energy infrastructure in Indonesia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jakob + MacFarlane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jakob + MacFarlane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob + MacFarlane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tbt1849 (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion - Pudgee Tha Phat Bastard

Good afternoon, I hope all is well. I am reaching out to you because you have helped me in the past with an article I wrote, "Spliff Star". I found you to be very helpful and can use your assistance here. I did a page for Pudgee Tha Phat Bastard, also known as T. Horton or Tracey Horton; he is a writer, emcee and producer and has written for Tupac, Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes, the Notorious B.I.G. and Rakim. He is also an artist in his own right with work on several marquee labels. He has been featured in several articles, including Forbes. The main issue I had upon submission was that wiki thought the page was dis-ambiguous due to his name and alias; one is used as his stage name and the other when he writes and produces. The individual who deleted the page is arguing that this individual cannot stand alone; I believe I have submitted enough information to support otherwise. If you agree with the deletion, what would you suggest I add/change? Any insight you can offer would be helpful. Jennaherche (talk) 21:27, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Jenna[reply]

Speedy Deletion - Pudgee Tha Phat Bastard

This is the link for the "Temp" page - I saved the info before they deleted it; thank God.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jennaherche/Pudgee_Tha_Phat_Bastard

Jennaherche (talk) 21:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Jenna[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm AaqibAnjum. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of Khalifas of Ahmed Ullah Maizbhanderi, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 16:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Andorran people of Danish descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Andorran people of Danish descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Andorran people of Dutch descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Andorran people of Dutch descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Andorran people of British descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Andorran people of British descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of Indian television series characters

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of Indian television series characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

Hey Pichpich - appreciate the support on REE Automotive, your commonsense, levelheaded approach, and demonstrating good citizenship with your actions; especially by adding a reference to an article that another user mentioned, yet refused to cite. Thanks again for the good sportsmanship! Alwayslearnedstuff (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia featured topics Metroid titles

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia featured topics Metroid titles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 01:56, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for adding categories to articles on Catholic Litanies - CalderRC

Nomination of List of European dust devils and dust devil outbreaks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of European dust devils and dust devil outbreaks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of European dust devils and dust devil outbreaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I am notifying you of this AfD because the original nominator did not. Lightburst (talk) 01:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Pichpich,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chilean sports executives and administrators

A tag has been placed on Category:Chilean sports executives and administrators requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, I have been cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates and noticed that Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_" is pointing to your monobook.js pages. clearly these are false positives (basically a bug in how WP parses .js pages). it would be really great if you could add
// <syntaxhighlight lang=javascript> to the top and
// </syntaxhighlight> to the bottom of those pages. by putting these tags in comments, it won't prevent the javascript from executing, but it will remove those pages from Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_". alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin (many people are using vector these days) and don't need to keep the old page, you could just have the page deleted. thank you in advance for your help. Frietjes (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Siksakubur albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Siksakubur albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Yugoslav sailplanes

A tag has been placed on Category:Yugoslav sailplanes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1671 in law

A tag has been placed on Category:1671 in law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:200 disestablishments

A tag has been placed on Category:200 disestablishments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Amusement parks closed in 2017

A tag has been placed on Category:Amusement parks closed in 2017 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Water parks in China

A tag has been placed on Category:Water parks in China requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:200s disestablishments

A tag has been placed on Category:200s disestablishments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jamaican football clubs 2019–20 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Jamaican football clubs 2019–20 season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2019–20 in Jamaican football

A tag has been placed on Category:2019–20 in Jamaican football requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to speedily rename categories

Please see my proposal to rename Category:Airlines in Alaska to Category:Airlines based in Alaska Category:Airlines of Hawaii to Category:Airlines based in Hawaii Hugo999 (talk) 09:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pete Peters (musician)

Hello, Pichpich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pete Peters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

triage/review

the lack of anything on talk pages of pages cosidered to have been reviewed might be a small problem - please make yourelf more familiar with that projects and assessments might do to help such a process- please ask if you are unsure what I mean. Thanks. JarrahTree 10:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JarrahTree, Indeed, I have no idea what you're talking about. New pages review is not concerned with empty or non-empty talk pages. Pichpich (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

exactly - that says everything - have a look, try learning about them, main space pages are only a part of what wikipedia is about - have a look at a talk page - get a handle - it will make your wikipedia experience that little more rewardig - enjoy ! JarrahTree 00:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you reviewed my article but....

It is still under construction and tagged as in use. It would be nice to have so,e patience. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 00:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThurstonMitchell, don't wory reviewing it as a valid Wikipedia topic does not in any way interfere with your editing of the article. Pichpich (talk) 00:30, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know that but you are missing my point. Waiting ten to fifteen minutes wasn’t gonna hurt you.

I'm not sure what you're complaining about. Waiting ten minutes would not have affected anything. Reviewing the page is not something that you can do yourself and giving you the green light on an early version or a slightly more developed version is a wash. Pichpich (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for improving my disambiguation page

I don’t think I have ever created a disambiguation page before, I’m I’m pretty sure I didn’t do a great job, so I was nervous that my work was about to be reverted. I was delighted to see that you improved it instead. Thanks. —2600:387:6:803:0:0:0:37 (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC) 2600:387:6:803:0:0:0:37 (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome obviously but since you're editing while logged-out, I have no idea which disambiguation page you're referring to! Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 00:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the blank page

RedurMaye (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedurMaye, I'm not sure that it is wise to do this on the page Sassanids. The origins of the Sassanid are already covered in part in Sasanian Empire (especially the section "History"), Timeline of the Sasanian Empire, Kings of Persis, Sasan and House of Sasan. Starting a new page that significantly intersects the scope of these other articles is likely to lead to a content fork which would be detrimental. Instead, you can contribute by expanding the existing articles. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am right now working on filling the page with a lengthy contribution about the origins of the Sassanid.

RedurMaye (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedurMaye, The thing is that the translation from the article's title (Krak des Chevaliers) is Knight's fortress. Maybe the first sentence should be rewritten. Pichpich (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam, why did you suddenly search for my edits and reverted the right translation of Hisni Ekrad into Castle of Kurds to Castle of Knights? "Ekrad" is directly translated into "Kurd"

RedurMaye (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC) I see your point. The translation of "Castle of Kurds" refers however in the sentence to the Arabic Hisni Ekrad and shows it even in Arabic script. My edit was after all correct. But I'll keep an eye on it so I wouldn't do such mistakes either.[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	This'll piece olympics. JorgeGiu1990 (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why I deserve this but hey, I'll take it! Thanks JorgeGiu1990, Pichpich (talk) 20:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yorkshire Coastliner

Hi Pichpich,

I have noticed your recent addition of an article issue box on the Yorkshire coastliner page. Are you able to highlight which sources you are referring to? Any help towards resolving the issue will be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks, Ash — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshlyJethro (talk • contribs) 19:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AshlyJethro, I was referring to the links to www.yorkshirecoastliner.co.uk and www.transdevbus.co.uk. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An, no problem. The Yorkshirecoastliner.co.uk can be confined to the info box. I had included a page from TransdevBus.co.uk as it provides the brands and routes for the service. However I can remove this if necessary. Thanks, Ash AshlyJethro (talk) 10:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century Catholic Church councils has been nominated for merging

Category:7th-century Catholic Church councils has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:780s disestablishments

A tag has been placed on Category:780s disestablishments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maldivian football referees

A tag has been placed on Category:Maldivian football referees requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Pichpich,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

J-Boog

Hi Pichpich. I'm Barkeep49, another new page patroller. I noticed you marked J-Boog as patrolled this morning. Myself and another patroller had restored redirects owing to concerns over the lack of citations and sourcing for a BLP. Can I ask you to share your thinking on this one? Thanks and best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barkeep49, yeah, I hesitated in restoring the redirect because the referencing was iffy. In the end, I judged it could survive as a standalone article but I'm fine with the redirect so long as the B2K article describes (if succinctly) the post-B2K of the individual members of the group. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]