User talk:Phil.Mcrackin123

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phil.Mcrackin123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Banned for illegitimate use, I’m an individual making edits, look at the history for the bullying I’ve been subjected to. Please look at this impartially it’s not malicious I’m trying to better this encyclopaedia these individuals attacking me are the problem, I’ve seen them making up reasons to block people

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coal Aston, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reasonable message. Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to be blocked again I'm afraid. Please see WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE for the reasons why. SN54129 13:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me ? Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will outline to me the reasons as to why I am blocked Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 13:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I’ve not been blocked ! Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 13:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serial_Number_54129

See this individual and his comments made here for a clear example of power trips on Wikipedia ! When in doubt don’t block ! Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 13:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet to be blocked, I was threatened, clear that example of intimidation ! See edit history on talk page to see manner this individual addressed me ! Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attacked the wiki of coal Aston claiming local amenities are unsourced ! This pest should do his own research and maybe open up a online map ! However, they will not do such a thing as they waste their time dealing with none issues ! Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These people are so wrong on everything

They have here exemplified their absolute contempt for this encyclopaedia, they get a buzz and kick off attacking small users which I can tell you here categorically are not the same individual ! Happy that they’ve exposed themselves here for the scandalous ghouls they are ! Phil.Mcrackin123 (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]