User talk:Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy)/Archive 5

User page

Monumental yet so personal

I really like Uta im Naumburger Dom.jpg, how did you come across it. Oh and hello. Ceoil (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Why, it's the lovely Uta von Ballenstedt! I've known of Uta for a long time, she's quite the standout medieval sculpture- specifically tho I ran into her again while translating a bit on the Naumburg Master. There's something so appealing about that gesture of lifting up her collar- like she's hiding her face but not really trying. I recall reading that Umberto Eco once said that if he could have an hour with any woman from the Middle Ages, it would be her. Can't say I blame him. Oh and hi yourself. Lithoderm 03:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Im afraid Umberto will have to get in the que. Top of my 'to-do' list at the moment is [1]. Yeah, Im sad, I know. But we live in hope. Ceoil (talk) 12:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I've robbed, anyhow, the image for my talk. If you have a problem with that, well, off you go to become an admin and block me. 19:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Cait O'Riordan is very nice indeed. Pronounced facial features are definitely a plus for me... I've never understood why so many people think plastic-smooth round faces are attractive... Steal away. I would have devote myself exclusively to important things like talk page tagging and AWB browsing before I could ever make admin. Lithoderm 20:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Cait is smashing, she does a lot of radio here and so brimming with personality, we all just love her. She is v cute, god bless. But anyway your better off not being an admin; the badge usually drags you away from the things that brough you here. Your doing v nice work incidently, v nice to see. We should do a colab again at some stage if you are on and want to focus. Wiki is always more fun when there is a few working together. Ceoil (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, I've been reading a bit on early modernism in the US. Dunno if that's your thing. The centennial of the Armory Show, which was the major catalyst for modern art in the States, is coming up in 2013 - and as luck would have it, the German article on it is FA. Same thing with Nude Descending a Staircase, the centerpiece of the show. I mentioned these to Modernist a while back, and he seemed interested. It seems likely that between the three of us, we could easily (as far as anything at FA is easy) get these to featured. I'd translate the German sections and we'd go from there. I've tried starting on them myself, but for some reason it's easier to start from nothing than it is to try and integrate translated text into a pre-existing article... I also have this painting in the tube... Lithoderm 20:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Im listening Lith, but I find modern art is very difficult to right about. I've tried recently with Degas and Klimt, but found the sources too abstract for me to summarise and went down in flames in both cases. Freud and Bacon would be more my avenue, I suppose because both are figurative and both had, eh, interesting social lives, so there is a lot to write about and hooks are easy. By the way are you still living in Germany, and what part? As I said before we have a big ex pat community of germans here in cork, and I've lived there a few times myself, its a great place, a faciniting and resonant culture. Ceoil (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, if you thought the geographic and chronological problems in defining Early Netherlandish Painting were bad-- with modern art there's always a risk of it degenerating into "the formalists say X- however, feminist scholars have said Y about it, and semioticians reject both views in favor of Z; meanwhile, post-structuralists have deconstructed all three views, and by the way some random mathematician has analyzed the compositional vectors of..." --- But seriously, consider the Armory Show. We don't have to stitch an "analysis" section for an artwork together out of 15 contradictory sources- it's a history of an exhibition, its reception, legacy, etc. Though if you're really bent on something earlier, I'd like to improve the Isenheim Altarpiece and Matthias Grünewald.

Unfortunately I'm in school and splitting my time between Cincinnati and Lexington. Over-the-Rhine is about the closest I get to Germany at this point, but some day... Next time I'd like to visit Weimar and the rest of the former GDR. Supposedly there are fewer English speakers there, which would be great. It could be incredibly annoying in Munich -- You make one grammatical error and then - aha! It's a native English speaker! It's Christmas! We'll practice our English! You can recommend English-language authors for us! So that we can practice our English! Can you tell sat I am Cherman when I talk English to you? What? You want to improve your German? Why would a foreigner want to learn German? Blech..... Lithoderm 01:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh yeah man Isenheim Altarpiece would be a great thing to work up, its proto goth he he, and I have already tried with Crucifix (Cimabue, Santa Croce). Have been to Weimar a bunch of times, but mostly I was in Erfurt, with months in Munich, Stuttgard, Hanover and Dresdin. I liked Erfurt best. Munich is well, Munich. Too big, too serious. Ceoil (talk) 02:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the Isenheim Altarpiece would be great. I'll start reading up on it after I finish my long delayed paper. Lithoderm 05:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Nicola Hicks

It's your fault, you know - you shouldn't write such interesting articles that make a fellow want to know more. :-)

Happy to be of help - keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Abigail Fallis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Women sculptors/artists

Thre are a couple of female sculptors/artists in the list I made in the "perhaps overlooked articles" thread at: Wikipedia talk:WikiWomen's History Month. GraniteStateGrump (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Marie Cazin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sepia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Sculpture

Hi Litho, can you check this out? [2]. Keep an eye out and input would be appreciated...Modernist (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Have you tried thru email this user?..Modernist (talk) 00:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Got it, thanks...Modernist (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar for your collection

		The Barnstar of Fine Arts
		Thanks for your impressive development of the List of female sculptors and the numerous new stub articles you've created! Sionk (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, that's very kind. You've been doing good work yourself this last month and more. I hope to continue working with you and on similar articles in the future. Agnes Dürer is in progress as we speak. Peace, Lithoderm 20:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Moving Blake articles

Hey Lith, I noticed that yesterday someone moved There is No Natural Religion to There Is No Natural Religion and All Religions are One to All Religions Are One. I don't really see the point of this, but if we're being pedantic, don't the pages now have inaccurate titles? The correctly formatted titles now exist as redirect links. I was checking through some of Blake's other poems to see how the page title corresponded with the poem title, and I note they all match exactly except Milton a Poem, which has been moved to Milton (poem). That's just inaccurate surely; the name of the poem is Milton a Poem, not Milton. Strangely, the user who moved No Natural Religion and All Religions is not the same user who moved Milton. I'd be inclined to move all three back to where they were, but I wanted to get your take on it first. Bertaut (talk) 02:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Move them back. This is User:Headbomb, right? He also moved Jerusalem the Emanation of the Giant Albion to Jerusalem: The Emanation of the Giant Albion, and I moved it back. I saw the Milton move too and wasn't happy, but I wasn't quite as certain about that one. If you agree, that's enough for me. It's simply what's in Erdman, the authoritative edition. Earlier writers on Blake, and unfortunately most anthologists today, tend to "correct" his writing. So people who've only read Blake in anthologies come in and think that our spellings are "incorrect". The same is true of the poems from Songs of Innocence and Experience - it seems like every other week some joker comes in and wants to punctuate them. BTW, did you get my barnstar? I really appreciate your work on those articles. Speaking of Jerusalem, that article needs work... I'll have to get to it one of these days... Thanks, Lithoderm 02:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey. I moved Milton, but I can't move TNNR or ARO because the article I'm trying to move them too now exists as a redirect; There is No Natural Religion is now a redirect to There Is No Natural Religion, so when I try to move the article back to it's original address, I'm getting told I can't do it. No idea what I should do now. As regards the barnstar, I did indeed get it, I sent you an email thanking you, did it not go through? Bertaut (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Strange, I haven't gotten anything. As for the articles, I'll take a look at them sometime tonight. This is also odd - you should be able to move pages over redirects. Hmm. Lithoderm 23:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Got it! It had gotten caught in my spam filter, for some reason. Lithoderm 00:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Glad you got it, I'd hate you to think I was unappreciative! As for the two pages, I think it's because the redirect link and the article title are identical apart from a single capitalised letter. I've had a look through the help (which is never easy), and I think we may need to request a move and get an admin to do it. I'll let you take a look first and see what you think, if you can't do it, I'll request a move on both pages, you can agree with it, and it will be moved in 7 days. Bertaut (talk) 01:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey. I got an admin to move ARO and TNNR back to their original pages. And Milton hasn't been moved back, so it's all good. For now anyway. Talk to you later. Bertaut (talk) 17:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Paula_Wagner

• - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Paula_Wagner

Hi there is a discussion about the picture you add to the P Wagner BLP - please join in the discussion there - thanks - Youreallycan 21:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.141 (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I guess. Random, much? Lithoderm 04:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Thranx anyhow

Re this: I happen to disagree, but I won't fight about it. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 05:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Antennae just sounds odd to me in that context. I checked the OED too, and it has the distinction in an example but does not explicitly endorse it in the entry. Really, who knows... thanks for not edit warring over minutiae though. Lithoderm 05:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Ah, here's an pertinent article. It does appear to be a WP:ENGVAR distinction. Lithoderm 05:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

WP Visual Arts in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Visual Arts for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Piatt Park

I am in conflict with an IP about a single paragraph in the article on Piatt Park, which you created. What's your view? —Stepheng3 (talk) 22:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

The section on Occupy is definitely notable, no question about it. It is well referenced, and there's even more information that could be added, such as the fact that Jesse Jackson was there in November to address the protesters. What's annoying is that he also removed the bit on it being popularly referred to as "Garfield Park". Now I've lived in Cincinnati for some years and know this to be true - big statue of Garfield, located on Garfield Place right next to the Garfield Suites Hotel - but the link I used to cite this has gone dead. Hmmm. I'll take a look. Lithoderm 19:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Found it on the Internet Archive. I've reverted the removal and updated the citation. We could stand to add a little more on Occupy, as the two sentences we currently have make it sound like a one time event, when in fact it continued into November and I believe was briefly revived in the spring of 2012. Lithoderm 19:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I'll keep the article on my watchlist for awhile. —Stepheng3 (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Blondi Edit

I saw your deletion of my edit on Blondi where I included a Cultural Reference. I have reinstated my text as the information is correct and as far as I know is the only example of a reference to Blondi in popular culture. In future if you delete an edit you should have the manners to explain your deletion. Mimaroba (talk) 06:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimaroba (talk • contribs) 06:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Seattle Public Library

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Brice Marden.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brice Marden.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Recommend a doppelganger account

Hey. FYI, I went searching for your account once I realized that you redirected Lithoderm to Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy), and realized that Petropoxy is still an open account. Just to ensure no one tries to misuse your identity within the community, I would recommend registering that username as well per the legitimate uses of multiple accounts policy, Sadads (talk) 15:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, will do. Lithoderm 23:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

GLAM and The William Blake Archive

Hello, I noticed recently that you have contributed to a number of the high quality William Blake articles. I thought I might reach out to you. I am going to be working with content from The William Blake Archive this summer as a volunteer and then into the fall as an Graduate Student Intern with the archive. I was thinking about setting up some volunteer GLAM-Wiki activities, and was wondering if you interested in helping/supporting?

Also, I would be interested for any agenda suggestions you might have for my time with the Archive. I would appreciate feedback at User:Sadads/Blake under the Agenda Items heading (Please don't spread it too widely, I am going to use that page as mostly a working document and I haven't had the internship and "GLAM-Wiki cooperation" 100% officially recognized by the Archive).

Thanks again, and I hope to cooperating with you in the future, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

All images sorted by book and copy on Wikimedia Commons would be a start. I began to manually upload them, but that was quite a while ago. I haven't been very active with Wikipedia since last summer, when a GLAM project I attempted to initiate fell through. Just demoralizing, I guess. I wish you better luck with the William Blake Archive. I didn't even know they were a physical institution. Anyhow, I've been nabbing their images for years despite their false claims of copyright over public domain artworks. I'll think about it and take a look at the page, if I get a chance. I would be interested in helping, if what you initiate goes through. If you're interested, I can advise re what not to do in GLAM projects, as I'm certainly experienced in that. Here's a free one - don't count your chickens before they're hatched ("haven't had the internship 100% recognized by the Archive"). Also, are you part of the GLAM mailing list? Yours, Lithoderm 23:54, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't respond earlier, I wasn't watching your page. I am part of the US GLAM list, and will be on the main one again in the near future. I know somethings of the problems with GLAM initiatives, I was on the team when we first started talking with the Smithsonian, and that was flop for a little while....

The Blake Archive isn't a physical institution, they are entirely web based, but I am working with one of the editors and with support from their editorial board (and will try to run physical events in England and in the States). I have, since my earlier comments, ironed out the details. I am well aware of their copyright claim problem, and they are as well (they do that claim to ensure that private donors will still give them copies of Blake images. I am going to try to find a more reasonable copyright claim for them to publish or give us on commons while I work with them over the summer and into the fall). Also, I want to invite you to the William Blake Task Force, it's where I will be organizing things. Sadads (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy). You have new messages at Sadads's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blake Update 1

Naomi entreating Ruth and Orpah to return to the land of Moab.

William Blake Archive GLAM Update #1 Check out the first update on the GLAM-Wiki cooperation with William Blake Archive and the William Blake Task Force, Sadads (talk) 21:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC) This is a transclusion from Wikipedia:WikiProject Poetry/William Blake/Updates/Update 1/Announce. If you would not like to receive future messages about Blake GLAM-Wiki, please remove yourself from Wikipedia:Blake#Members. This update was distributed by User:Sadads

Blake's illustration from For Children The Gates of Paradise

Feedback/Thoughts on Spectre (Blake) or Visionary Heads

Hey Paul, would you mind giving some feedback/thoughts/help expanding on Spectre (Blake) or Visionary Heads? The first is on the way through DYK, and the other just finished it's stint, and it would be nice to have another set of eyes on them as part of WP:Blake, Sadads (talk) 23:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Nice work! I'll take a look at them if I get a chance, but I'm deep in the middle of creating work for my senior thesis so it may be a while. By the way, I'm Nathanael. I think you have me confused with Ceoil. Lithoderm 22:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Oops sorry about that, definitely didn't mean to call you the wrong name... Whenever you get an opportunity would be great,Sadads (talk) 22:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice pictures of the Schreyer-Landauer-Epitaph in Nuremberg Aarp65 (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia LGBT

I just wanted to bring Wikimedia LGBT, a proposed user group and thematic organization that promotes the development of content on Wikimedia projects which is of interest to LGBT communities, to your attention. I am sure you are so busy with your current projects, but I hope you might be able to direct people to this group if they are interested in LGBT content in any way. Of course, you are also more than welcome to indicate your interest/support, if you wish. Hopefully we can get some LGBT-related GLAM/Education/etc. projects up and running in the near future. Best, --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

[3]...Modernist (talk) 03:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Hope you're doing well yourself. I miss you guys; hope to return to some degree as soon as things clear up. I'm in the middle of my senior year and have so many things to attend to... Coincidentally, I was just listening to some early Dylan earlier today. Lithoderm 06:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Job's Evil Dreams detail.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Job's Evil Dreams detail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Semi-retired status

Hi: I was doing some work on Blake materials because I have been supporting a class that has filled in the missing poems from Songs of Innocence and of Experience, and I realized that you placed a semi-retirement a year ago. I was a bit surprised:Its sad to see someone who created such great content, go away. I was wondering if I could tease you out of retirement, with anything: I find that the most refreshing parts of my work is outreach with projects like WP:GLAM, the Education program and the The Wikipedia Library. Anyway, I hope you are well, and its a shame to see someone with so much experience doing humanities working missing from the community, Sadads (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

I guess I just became disillusioned with the whole project, between my WiR attempt falling flat and some other factors. It became clear to me how little my efforts here mattered to the real world, and my academics had begun to suffer besides. I've spent time in the last year or so devoting myself to rectifying that and developing more social hobbies. Anyhow I might be able to lend a hand in a couple of weeks, but right now I'm deep into an internship and haven't the time. Best, Lithoderm 04:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ohio Wikimedians User Group - Invitation

Hi Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy),

I'm Kevin, one of the founding members of the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. Created in July 2016, we're working to be a central group of Ohio Wikimedians who organize and support offline events, promote the Wikimedia movement in Ohio, build connections throughout our state, and above all, support each other. We already have a handful of members and have worked to support multiple events, including Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States and several Art+Feminism edit-a-thons at universities throughout Ohio.

I wanted to reach out to you and invite you to join the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. Being a part of the user group will allow easy communication between active Ohio editors, notifications of upcoming events in the Ohio area, and, if you're interested, the opportunity to help organize events such as edit-a-thons or workshops. Some notes:

• All members receive a monthly newsletter with recent happenings, upcoming events, and more. Check out our April newsletter here.
• This Thursday at 8:30 EST, we're having our first online meeting. Check out our meeting page here for more details, an agenda, and a section to sign up if you'd like to join us. Topics will include introductions and brainstorming for future projects.

Right now we have a Wikipedia Takes Columbus photo event going on, a Wiknic coming up this summer, and opportunities to attend the upcoming Ohio Private Academic Libraries Conference. If you're interested in joining us, feel free to add your name here - and feel free to reach out to me (or post on the user group's talk page) with questions or discussions. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Odalisque with Arms Raised.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Odalisque with Arms Raised.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy). Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sergeant of the Colonial Regiment 1906-7.jpg

The file File:Sergeant of the Colonial Regiment 1906-7.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lower-quality version of File:Sergeant of the Colonial Regiment Albert Marquet (1906-1907).jpg on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vahurzpu (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)