User talk:Perse9s

Welcome!

Hi Perse9s! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 22:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear. What's your problem? I edit according to the source ==> (After the collapse of the Parthians, Padishkhwargar (224 AD) was established in the north of Iran),, the user [of Iran] deletes my edits for NO REASON, Is this my fault?? This user is from Gilan and I know he does Not have a good relationship with the Mazandarani people, So he tries to falsify the history of Tabaristan. I just found a page where he faked something, Please Check the Gil gavbara article and read the commits I wrote carefully! Also, he tries to introduce Gil Gavbare as the Ispahbud of Khorasan, while Gavbare is the Ispahbud of Tabarstan!! It's Not my wrong. Perse9s (talk) 10:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pls check the Gil Gavbara Ispahbud of Tabaristan article, and see my commit. Perse9s (talk) 10:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perse9s, not only are you edit warring, but you are also socking, so running this account will only get you into more trouble. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 14:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Parthian Empire. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Perse9s (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

() Perse9s (talk) 03:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fashion in Iran

The images you added to Fashion in Iran appeared to be excessive and have been removed. Thank you. Nythar^T^.^C 01:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

aha, it is better to delete the old images. Fashion should be according to the current year Perse9s (talk) 01:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily; it might include the history of Iran's fashion. Nythar^T^.^C 01:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is important to update the Wikipedia content, everything that Iranian government news tells you is Not true. you should do some searching on the social pages like instagram to see iranian boys and girls fashion style Perse9s (talk) 01:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello, Perse9s. I've removed the images you've used on the Mahsa Amini protests article because they don't have a compatible licence for use on Wikipedia. Before you upload any more media, I'd like you read through our image use policy. ArcticSeeress (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok computer warrior Perse9s (talk) 03:34, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hananeh Kia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hananeh Kia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kos madaret Perse9s (talk) 03:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]